Split-Mouth Comparison of Invisalign Attachments

NCT ID: NCT07215598

Last Updated: 2025-10-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-11-30

Study Completion Date

2028-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study evaluates how accurately the attachments used in Invisalign treatment (Align Technology Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) match their planned shapes and sizes in the ClinCheck software (ClinCheck®, Align Technology Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). Attachments are small tooth-colored bumps that help clear aligners grip the teeth and move them effectively.

The investigators are comparing two types of attachments: optimized and conventional, to determine which is bonded to the tooth more accurately and maintains its shape better over time. Participants beginning Invisalign treatment will have attachments placed as part of their normal care. Digital scans will be taken immediately after placement and during follow-up visits to assess attachment accuracy and wear.

The goal is to identify which attachment design provides greater precision and durability to improve the predictability and efficiency of Invisalign treatment planning.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Wear, Restoration Volume Assessment Clear Aligner Appliance

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

This is a prospective, randomized split-mouth (crossover) study evaluating two types of Invisalign attachments: optimized and conventional. Each participant receives both attachment types on contralateral teeth, allowing within-subject comparison of placement accuracy and wear under identical clinical conditions.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Optimized

Optimized attachments are small, tooth-colored composite bumps placed on teeth during Invisalign treatment to help aligners deliver controlled forces for tooth movement. These attachments are digitally designed in the ClinCheck software to optimize force direction and retention. In this arm, optimized attachments will be bonded according to the manufacturer's standard template and curing protocols. Their bonded geometry and wear over time will be compared to those of conventional attachments placed on the contralateral teeth.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Composite Aligner Attachment

Intervention Type DEVICE

Composite aligner attachments are small, tooth-colored resin bumps bonded to specific teeth during Invisalign treatment to enhance aligner retention and force application. These attachments are digitally planned in ClinCheck software and fabricated using manufacturer-provided templates. In this study, two designs: optimized and conventional, will be compared for their accuracy and durability using 3D digital scans at multiple time points.

Conventional

Conventional attachments are tooth-colored composite bumps placed on teeth during Invisalign treatment to improve aligner retention and control tooth movement. These attachments are designed with standard rectangular or ellipsoid shapes, following established clinical templates. In this arm, conventional attachments will be bonded using manufacturer-recommended materials and curing protocols. Their placement accuracy and wear characteristics will be compared to those of optimized attachments placed on the contralateral teeth within the same participant.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Composite Aligner Attachment

Intervention Type DEVICE

Composite aligner attachments are small, tooth-colored resin bumps bonded to specific teeth during Invisalign treatment to enhance aligner retention and force application. These attachments are digitally planned in ClinCheck software and fabricated using manufacturer-provided templates. In this study, two designs: optimized and conventional, will be compared for their accuracy and durability using 3D digital scans at multiple time points.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Composite Aligner Attachment

Composite aligner attachments are small, tooth-colored resin bumps bonded to specific teeth during Invisalign treatment to enhance aligner retention and force application. These attachments are digitally planned in ClinCheck software and fabricated using manufacturer-provided templates. In this study, two designs: optimized and conventional, will be compared for their accuracy and durability using 3D digital scans at multiple time points.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults aged18 years or older.
* Patients initiating Invisalign treatment with planned composite attachments.
* Ability to provide written informed consent and agree to additional research intra-oral scans.
* Good oral hygiene and absence of active periodontal disease at enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria

* Extensive dental restorations (composites, crowns, veneers) on study teeth that could interfere with attachment bonding.
* Enamel defects or severe wear on study tooth surfaces affecting bonding accuracy.
* Contraindications to digital intraoral scanning (e.g., severe gag reflex, metallic prostheses preventing accurate imaging).
* Severe tooth malposition that would compromise accurate attachment placement.
* Poor oral hygiene or active periodontal disease at enrollment and/or if the patient develops poor oral hygiene or active periodontal disease during treatment.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Maryland, Baltimore

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Maria Doughan

Clinical Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Maryland School of Dentistry

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Maria Doughan, DDS, MS

Role: CONTACT

410-706-2657

Tori Wallace, DDS

Role: CONTACT

443-416-6741

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Maria Doughan, DDS, MS

Role: primary

313-409-4052

Tori Wallace, DDS

Role: backup

4434166741

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Muthuswamy Pandian S, Subramanian AK, Vaiid N. Comparison of efficacy and accuracy of tooth movements in optimized and conventional attachments of clear aligners - A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2025 Sep-Oct;15(5):1123-1133. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.07.019. Epub 2025 Jul 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 40778386 (View on PubMed)

Li Q, Yang K. Surface wear of attachments in patients during clear aligner therapy: a prospective clinical study. Prog Orthod. 2024 Feb 19;25(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40510-023-00506-y.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38369617 (View on PubMed)

Fausto da Veiga Jardim A, Curado de Freitas J, Estrela C. Surface wear and adhesive failure of resin attachments used in clear aligner orthodontic treatment. J Orofac Orthop. 2024 May;85(Suppl 1):52-62. doi: 10.1007/s00056-023-00471-5. Epub 2023 Jun 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37314488 (View on PubMed)

Bellocchio AM, Portelli M, Ciraolo L, Ciancio E, Militi A, Peditto M, Barbera S, Nucera R. Evaluation of the Clinical Variables Affecting Attachment Reproduction Accuracy during Clear Aligner Therapy. Materials (Basel). 2023 Oct 23;16(20):6811. doi: 10.3390/ma16206811.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37895792 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HP-00115664

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Essix Retainer vs Hawley Retainer
NCT01583933 UNKNOWN PHASE3
Primer Aligner Study
NCT02550938 COMPLETED NA