Damon vs MBT Braces: Patient Compliance and Treatment Efficiency
NCT ID: NCT07185087
Last Updated: 2025-09-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
34 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-04-01
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Effectiveness of Damon Ultima Vs Conventional Brackets Trial)
NCT05978817
Comparative Outcomes of Damon Ultima vs Pitts 21 Pro Bracket Systems
NCT07318623
Effectiveness of Insignia ™ Versus Standard Orthodontic Treatment With Damon Q Brackets
NCT01268852
Patient-centered Outcomes During Using Self-ligating Brackets With or Without Piezocision vs Traditional Brackets
NCT05416242
Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Between Two Different Types of Orthodontic Appliances
NCT06401382
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A standardized protocol will be followed. Each patient will undergo extraoral and intraoral photography, intraoral scanning with Medit i700 (Medit Corp., Seoul, South Korea), and radiographic evaluation (CBCT and lateral cephalogram). On bonding day, gingival index and plaque index will be assessed. All teeth will then be isolated and cleaned with a mixture of water and pumice using a rubber-polishing cup on a low-speed handpiece. The teeth will be rinsed and dried with an oil-free air syringe, and etched using the conventional acid-etching technique (37% orthophosphoric acid applied for 30 seconds). The surfaces will be thoroughly rinsed with water for 10 seconds to ensure complete removal of the etchant, in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The enamel will then be gently dried with air until a frosty-white appearance is observed.
A uniform coat of universal bonding primer (Ortho Solo, Ormco Corp., Glendora, California, USA) will be applied to the etched surfaces using a nylon bond brush. Each tooth will receive a gentle air blow for 2 seconds with the air stream directed perpendicular to the enamel surface. After etching and priming, a thin layer of adhesive (Green Glow, Ormco Corp., Glendora, California, USA) will be applied to the mesh base of each bracket, which will be positioned on the buccal surface of the tooth using a bracket holder. The bracket height will be determined according to the manufacturer's instructions. Any excess adhesive will be carefully removed from around the base of the bracket with a dental probe prior to curing, without disturbing the seated bracket. The adhesive will then be light-cured for 20 seconds.
In the intervention group, Damon Ultima brackets (Ormco Corp., Glendora, California, USA) will be bonded from the second molar to the second molar in each arch. In the comparison group, MBT Mini Diamond brackets (Ormco Corp., Glendora, California, USA) will be bonded from the second molar to the second molar in each arch. Damon Ultima archwires (Ormco Corp., Glendora, California, USA) will be used for both groups in the following sequence: 0.014-inch CuNiTi, 0.018-inch CuNiTi, and 0.014 × 0.0275-inch CuNiTi.
All patients will receive an oral hygiene kit, a brochure on dietary recommendations, and a printed questionnaire to assess pain during treatment (developed for the study). Patients will be reviewed every 8 weeks, during which gingival index, plaque index, photographs, intraoral scans, and questionnaires will be collected. Patients will also be instructed to contact the operator immediately and attend as soon as possible in the event of bracket bond failure. The treatment will be followed up for 6 months.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Damon
Damon Ultima Self-ligating Brackets
passive self-ligating, Damon Ultima brackets
Patients will receive Damon Ultima self-ligating brackets (Ormco Corp., Glendora, California, USA) bonded from the second molar to the second molar in each arch. Archwires will follow a standardized sequence: 0.014-inch CuNiTi, 0.018-inch CuNiTi, and 0.014 × 0.0275-inch CuNiTi (Ormco Corp., Glendora, California, USA). All bonding procedures will follow a standardized protocol, including enamel cleaning, acid etching, primer application (Ortho Solo), and adhesive curing (Green Glow).
MBT
MBT Mini Diamond Conventional brackets
Conventional ligation, MBT brackets
Patients will receive MBT Mini Diamond brackets (Ormco Corp., Glendora, California, USA) bonded in the same manner, with the same archwire sequence.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
passive self-ligating, Damon Ultima brackets
Patients will receive Damon Ultima self-ligating brackets (Ormco Corp., Glendora, California, USA) bonded from the second molar to the second molar in each arch. Archwires will follow a standardized sequence: 0.014-inch CuNiTi, 0.018-inch CuNiTi, and 0.014 × 0.0275-inch CuNiTi (Ormco Corp., Glendora, California, USA). All bonding procedures will follow a standardized protocol, including enamel cleaning, acid etching, primer application (Ortho Solo), and adhesive curing (Green Glow).
Conventional ligation, MBT brackets
Patients will receive MBT Mini Diamond brackets (Ormco Corp., Glendora, California, USA) bonded in the same manner, with the same archwire sequence.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age range between 16-40years of age.
* ANB angle not \<1° and not \>5°.
* Mild to moderate crowding, spacing and rotation.
* Requiring non-extraction treatment.
* The patient agreed to be part of this study.
Exclusion Criteria
* Permanent teeth extraction except third molar.
* Congenital anomaly.
* Cleft lip and palate patients.
* Patients with ectopic canine or other teeth.
* Patients with severe crowding (\<6mm).
16 Years
40 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Baghdad
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jehan Fadhil IBrahim
Principal Investigator, Orthodontics Department, University of Baghdad
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jehan F. IBrahim
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Baghdad
Hadeel A. Al-lami, Asst Prof.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of Baghdad
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Baghdad/ Collage of Dentistry
Baghdad, Iraq, Iraq
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Moyano J, Montagut D, Perera R, Fernandez-Bozal J, Puigdollers A. Comparison of changes in the dental transverse and sagittal planes between patients treated with self-ligating and with conventional brackets. Dental Press J Orthod. 2020 Jan-Feb;25(1):47-55. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.25.1.047-055.oar.
Coenen FA, Bartz JR, Niederau C, Craveiro RB, Knaup I, Wolf M. Orthodontic treatment quality evaluated by partially automated digital IOTN and PAR index determination: a retrospective multicentre study. Eur J Orthod. 2023 May 31;45(3):308-316. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjac064.
Barbosa IV, Ladewig VM, Almeida-Pedrin RR, Cardoso MA, Santiago Junior JF, Conti ACCF. The association between patient's compliance and age with the bonding failure of orthodontic brackets: a cross-sectional study. Prog Orthod. 2018 May 1;19(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40510-018-0209-1.
Jahanbin A, Hasanzadeh N, Khaki S, Shafaee H. Comparison of self-ligating Damon3 and conventional MBT brackets regarding alignment efficiency and pain experience: A randomized clinical trial. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2019 Fall;13(4):281-288. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2019.043.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Damon vs MBT brackets
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.