Comparison Between Clear Aligners and Traditional Fixed Appliances in the Treatment of Four-premolar-extraction Cases

NCT ID: NCT03645356

Last Updated: 2023-02-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-08-19

Study Completion Date

2022-07-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients who have severe crowding that require four premolars extraction will be treated in this study. The efficacy of the clear aligners and vestibular fixed appliances will be assessed. The treatment result of these two different methods will be explored using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) in two different times (T0: Before treatment, T1: After treatment) and the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (ABO-OGS) after treatment (T1).

There are two groups:

First group (Experimental): the patients in this group will be treated using clear aligners.

Second group (Control): the patients in this group will be treated using fixed appliances.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

For years, orthodontists and dentists have used removable appliances for orthodontic treatment. Today, with the CAD/CAM technology, clear aligners treat a broader range of cases with greater precision. They consist of a series of plastic aligners that are intended to replace conventional wire and bracket technology for many orthodontic cases. Each custom manufactured aligner exerts gentle, continuous forces to move teeth incrementally from their original state to a final, treated state. Each aligner is worn for about two weeks, then replaced by the next in the series until the final position is achieved.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Malocclusion, Angle Class I Malocclusion; Displaced or Missing Teeth Crowding

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

fixed appliances

patients will be treated using fixed appliances in order to align their teeth after extraction of four premolars

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fixed Appliances

Intervention Type DEVICE

Using an MBT-prescription of metallic brackets, patients will be treated in the conventional way

clear aligners

patients will be treated using clear aligners in order to align their teeth after extraction of four premolars

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Clear Aligners

Intervention Type DEVICE

Using a sequence of clear aligners, patients will be give an aligner every two weeks until the completion of treatment

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fixed Appliances

Using an MBT-prescription of metallic brackets, patients will be treated in the conventional way

Intervention Type DEVICE

Clear Aligners

Using a sequence of clear aligners, patients will be give an aligner every two weeks until the completion of treatment

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Class I malocclusion with severe crowding (more than 5 mm of tooth-size-arch-length-discrepancy).
* Good oral hygiene and periodontal health.
* No severe skeletal discrepancy.
* Normal proclination for the upper and lower incisors.
* No congenitally missing or extracted teeth (except for the third molars).
* No history of previous trauma to the maxillofacial region or surgical interventions.

Exclusion Criteria

* Bimaxillary dentoalveolar severe protrusion.
* Previous orthodontic treatment.
* Subject with psychological abnormalities.
* Subject with systemic diseases.
* Subject has known allergy to latex and plastic
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

25 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Damascus University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Samer T Jaber, DDS MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

PhD Student in Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus

Mohammad Y Hajeer, DDS MSc PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Associate Professor of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School

Damascus, , Syria

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Syria

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bollen AM, Huang G, King G, Hujoel P, Ma T. Activation time and material stiffness of sequential removable orthodontic appliances. Part 1: Ability to complete treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Nov;124(5):496-501. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00576-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14614415 (View on PubMed)

Drake CT, McGorray SP, Dolce C, Nair M, Wheeler TT. Orthodontic tooth movement with clear aligners. ISRN Dent. 2012;2012:657973. doi: 10.5402/2012/657973. Epub 2012 Aug 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22928114 (View on PubMed)

Giancotti A, Di Girolamo R. Treatment of severe maxillary crowding using Invisalign and fixed appliances. J Clin Orthod. 2009 Sep;43(9):583-9; quiz 582. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19904051 (View on PubMed)

Hennessy J, Al-Awadhi EA. Clear aligners generations and orthodontic tooth movement. J Orthod. 2016 Mar;43(1):68-76. doi: 10.1179/1465313315Y.0000000004.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25939782 (View on PubMed)

Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B, BeGole E, Obrez A, Agran B. How well does Invisalign work? A prospective clinical study evaluating the efficacy of tooth movement with Invisalign. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jan;135(1):27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.05.018.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19121497 (View on PubMed)

Li W, Wang S, Zhang Y. The effectiveness of the Invisalign appliance in extraction cases using the the ABO model grading system: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 May 15;8(5):8276-82. eCollection 2015.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26221410 (View on PubMed)

Zhang XJ, He L, Guo HM, Tian J, Bai YX, Li S. Integrated three-dimensional digital assessment of accuracy of anterior tooth movement using clear aligners. Korean J Orthod. 2015 Nov;45(6):275-81. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2015.45.6.275. Epub 2015 Nov 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26629473 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UDDS-Ortho-07-2018

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.