The Effectiveness of Clear Aligner and Traditional Fixed Appliances in Achieving Good Occlusion in Complex Orthodontic Cases

NCT ID: NCT05500456

Last Updated: 2022-08-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-05-11

Study Completion Date

2021-12-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients who have severe crowding that requires four premolars extraction will be treated in this study. The efficacy and effectiveness of in-house clear aligners therapy compared with vestibular fixed appliances in the treatment of severe crowding malocclusion cases requiring the extraction of first premolars will be evaluated using Little's irregularity index (LII), Peer assessment rating index (PAR), and treatment duration.

There are two groups:

First group (Experimental): the patients in this group will be treated using clear aligners.

Second group (Control): the patients in this group will be treated using fixed appliances.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

For years, orthodontists and dentists have used removable appliances for orthodontic treatment. With the CAD/CAM technology, clear aligners treat a broader range of cases with greater precision. They consist of a series of plastic aligners that are intended to replace conventional wire and bracket technology for many orthodontic cases. Each custom-manufactured aligner exerts gentle, continuous forces to move teeth incrementally from their original state to a final, treated state. Each aligner is worn for about two weeks, then replaced by the next in the series until the final position is achieved.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Crowding, Tooth

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Clear aligners

The patients in this group will be treated using clear aligners.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Clear aligners

Intervention Type DEVICE

Each aligner will be worn for about two weeks, and then replaced by the next in the series until the final position is achieved.

Fixed appliances.

The patients in this group will be treated using fixed appliances.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fixed appliances

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional wires and brackets will be used.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Clear aligners

Each aligner will be worn for about two weeks, and then replaced by the next in the series until the final position is achieved.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Fixed appliances

Conventional wires and brackets will be used.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Class I skeletal and dental malocclusion
* severe crowding (more than 6 mm of tooth size-arch length discrepancy)
* Good oral hygiene and periodontal health.
* No congenitally missing or extracted teeth (except for the third molars).
* No history of previous trauma to the maxillofacial region or surgical interventions.

Exclusion Criteria

* Subject with psychological abnormalities.
* Subject with systemic diseases.
* Previous orthodontic treatment.
* Subject has known allergy to latex and plastic
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

25 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Damascus University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Samer T Jaber, DDS,MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of orthodontics, Damascus University, Syria

Mohammad Y Hajeer, DDS,MSc,PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Professor of Orthodontics, Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Damascus

Damascus, , Syria

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Syria

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jaber ST, Hajeer MY, Burhan AS, Latifeh Y. The Effect of Treatment With Clear Aligners Versus Fixed Appliances on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Severe Crowding: A One-Year Follow-Up Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Cureus. 2022 May 30;14(5):e25472. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25472. eCollection 2022 May.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35663697 (View on PubMed)

Jaber ST, Hajeer MY, Khattab TZ, Mahaini L. Evaluation of the fused deposition modeling and the digital light processing techniques in terms of dimensional accuracy of printing dental models used for the fabrication of clear aligners. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021 Aug;7(4):591-600. doi: 10.1002/cre2.366. Epub 2020 Nov 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33258297 (View on PubMed)

Li W, Wang S, Zhang Y. The effectiveness of the Invisalign appliance in extraction cases using the the ABO model grading system: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 May 15;8(5):8276-82. eCollection 2015.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26221410 (View on PubMed)

Liu S, Oh H, Chambers DW, Baumrind S, Xu T. Validity of the American Board of Orthodontics Discrepancy Index and the Peer Assessment Rating Index for comprehensive evaluation of malocclusion severity. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2017 Aug;20(3):140-145. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12195. Epub 2017 Jul 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28670875 (View on PubMed)

KESLING HD. Coordinating the predetermined pattern and tooth positioner with conventional treatment. Am J Orthod Oral Surg. 1946 May;32:285-93. doi: 10.1016/0096-6347(46)90053-1. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21027613 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UDDS-Ortho-13-2022

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.