Papillary Epinephrine Injection Combined With Rectal Indomethacin
NCT ID: NCT07173179
Last Updated: 2025-09-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
504 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-07-01
2023-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Many factors contribute to PEP, such as patient-related and endoscopist-related factors, but mainly two mechanisms are considered in terms of physiopathology: papillary edema caused by mechanical trauma during cannulation and thermal injury with electrocautery current.
Rectal NSAIDs and pancreatic stent placement are the two proven methods of PEP prophylaxis that are included in the guideline recommendations, but despite the frequent use of these methods, the incidence rates are still more than acceptable. There is a need for additional methods that are easy to implement, preferably low cost, and safe to reduce the risk of PEP.
Topical epinephrine applied submucosally can be a method that meets these goals. Ampullary epinephrine injection is an effective method in terms of post sphincterotomy bleeding but to our knowledge, there is no study examining its efficacy in PEP prophylaxis except for one retrospective study that we reported.
There are conflicting reports on epinephrine spraying on the papilla in terms of PEP, but these trials are mostly heterogeneous with different dose regimens. It should also be noted that spraying epinephrine on the papilla has a length of action of about 1 to 5 minutes but the length of action for epinephrine injection is roughly 120 minutes.
Given this information, we designed a large-scale, double-blind, randomized, controlled, superiority trial.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Papillary Epinephrine Spraying on Post-ERCP Pancreatitis in Patients Received Rectal Indomethacin
NCT03057769
Rectal Indomethacin in the Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
NCT01912716
Comparative Effectiveness Between Indomethacin and Pancreatic Stenting in the Prevention of Post ERCP Pancreatitis
NCT03713879
Indomethacin Decreases Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
NCT02110810
Effect of Papillary Epinephrine Spraying for the Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis in Patients Received Octreotide
NCT03756116
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients will be divided into two as a patient group and a control group by 1:1 simple randomization. The patients in the indomethacin group will receive 100mg of rectal indomethacin alone, just before the procedure. In the combination group, the patients will receive 100mg of rectal indomethacin just before the procedure plus 4 quadrants of the peripapillary region will be injected with 1mL of undiluted epinephrine, 1 mL in each quadrant 1 to 2 cm away from the papillary orifice just before pulling out the duodenoscope.
The blood pressure, pulse rate, and electrocardiography will be monitored in all patients both during and after the procedure. All patients will be hospitalized for at least one night and the serum amylase and lipase levels will be measured before and again 4 hours after the procedures. Amylase, lipase, and other blood tests will also be performed routinely 24 hours after ERCP.
PEP was described as at least a threefold increase in amylase levels together with typical abdominal pain 24 hours after the procedure. Post-ERCP hyperamylasemia was defined using normal clinical conditions, but serum amylase levels were elevated above the normal upper limit (100 IU/L) 24 hours after the procedure. Patients at high risk for PEP and difficult cannulation were defined according to the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Guidelines
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Rectal indomethacin alone
All patients in this group receive preprocedural 100mg indomethacin spp
Rectal indomethacin alone
All patients in this group receive preprocedural 100mg indomethacin spp
Rectal indomethacin combined wit papillary epinephrine injection
All patients in this group receive preprocedural 100mg indomethacin spp and post-procedure 4 ml of undiluted epinephrine injected around the duodenal papilla on four quadrants, over a period of 60 seconds using a sclerotherapy needle
Papillary epinephrine injection combined with rectal indomethacin
All patients in this group receive preprocedural 100mg indomethacin spp and post-procedure 4 ml of undiluted epinephrine injected around the duodenal papilla on four quadrants, over a period of 60 seconds using a sclerotherapy needle
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Papillary epinephrine injection combined with rectal indomethacin
All patients in this group receive preprocedural 100mg indomethacin spp and post-procedure 4 ml of undiluted epinephrine injected around the duodenal papilla on four quadrants, over a period of 60 seconds using a sclerotherapy needle
Rectal indomethacin alone
All patients in this group receive preprocedural 100mg indomethacin spp
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients who have naïve papilla (no previous procedure was performed at ampulla)
* Patients who is suspected to have a biliary obstruction or biliary disease
* Patients who are needed to have endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for treatment of biliary obstruction
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with mental retardation
* Patients allergic to contrast agents
* Patients who received sphincterotomy or pancreatobiliary operation previously
* Patients who have ampulla of Vater cancer
* Patients who have difficulty with the approach to ampulla due to abdominal surgery including stomach cancer with Billroth II anastomosis
* Patients who have pancreatic diseases as below (at least one more);
* acute pancreatitis within 30days before enrollment
* idiopathic acute recurrent pancreatitis
* pancreas divisum
* obstructive chronic pancreatitis
* pancreatic cancer
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Duzce University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Salih Tokmak
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Duzce University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Duzce University School of Medicine
Düzce, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, Niro G, Valvano MR, Spirito F, Pilotto A, Forlano R. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Aug;102(8):1781-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01279.x. Epub 2007 May 17.
Kochar B, Akshintala VS, Afghani E, Elmunzer BJ, Kim KJ, Lennon AM, Khashab MA, Kalloo AN, Singh VK. Incidence, severity, and mortality of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review by using randomized, controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jan;81(1):143-149.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.06.045. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
Pezzilli R, Romboli E, Campana D, Corinaldesi R. Mechanisms involved in the onset of post-ERCP pancreatitis. JOP. 2002 Nov;3(6):162-8.
Dumonceau JM, Kapral C, Aabakken L, Papanikolaou IS, Tringali A, Vanbiervliet G, Beyna T, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Hritz I, Mariani A, Paspatis G, Radaelli F, Lakhtakia S, Veitch AM, van Hooft JE. ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2020 Feb;52(2):127-149. doi: 10.1055/a-1075-4080. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
Torun S, Odemis B, Cetin MF, Onmez A, Coskun O. Efficacy of Epinephrine Injection in Preventing Post-ERCP Pancreatitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020 Oct 12;31(2):208-214. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000867.
Akshintala VS, Hutfless SM, Colantuoni E, Kim KJ, Khashab MA, Li T, Elmunzer BJ, Puhan MA, Sinha A, Kamal A, Lennon AM, Okolo PI, Palakurthy MK, Kalloo AN, Singh VK. Systematic review with network meta-analysis: pharmacological prophylaxis against post-ERCP pancreatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Dec;38(11-12):1325-37. doi: 10.1111/apt.12534. Epub 2013 Oct 20.
Aziz M, Ghanim M, Sheikh T, Sharma S, Ghazaleh S, Fatima R, Khan Z, Lee-Smith W, Nawras A. Rectal indomethacin with topical epinephrine versus indomethacin alone for preventing Post-ERCP pancreatitis - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pancreatology. 2020 Apr;20(3):356-361. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.02.003. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
Igawa M, Miyaoka M, Saitoh T. Influence of topical epinephrine application on microcirculatory disturbance in subjects with ulcerative colitis evaluated by laser Doppler flowmetry and transmission electron microscopy. Dig Endosc. 2000;12:126-130
Chung SC, Leung JW, Leung FW. Effect of submucosal epinephrine injection on local gastric blood flow. A study using laser Doppler flowmetry and reflectance spectrophotometry. Dig Dis Sci. 1990 Aug;35(8):1008-11. doi: 10.1007/BF01537250.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Rectal NSAID vs EI combo
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.