Prophylaxis of Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis

NCT ID: NCT05381428

Last Updated: 2025-06-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

184 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-05-13

Study Completion Date

2024-10-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to compare indomethacin and the combination of indomethacin and aggressive lactated Ringer infusion in terms of efficacy in preventing post-ERCP acute pancreatitis (PEP).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study aims to compare indomethacin and the combination of indomethacin and aggressive lactated Ringer infusion in terms of their efficacy in preventing PEP regardless of baseline risk in all eligible patients who have consecutively undergone ERCP. The intention is to confirm initial literature finding with a large sample size and a prospective, randomised, multicentre design to study and compare the efficacy of the two different prophylaxis strategies. The interest is determined by the need to assess whether there is a superiority of combination prophylaxis with indomethacin and a strong infusion of lactated Ringer against the exclusive administration of endorectal indomethacin, with a consequent considerable impact on the management of PEP. Shouldn't forget that both indomethacin and lactated Ringer have in the various studies only reduced the incidence of PEP compared to placebo. Therefore, PEP remains a possible complication even after prophylaxis with a single measure, even in low-risk patients. If the study demonstrates the superiority of combination prophylaxis, it could offer this to all patients with gains in PEP, hospitalisation, and complication management costs.

It should be noted that, compared with previous studies, this protocol doesn't include a placebo control arm. This choice, shared by all the centres involved, is dictated by the awareness that literature studies have already documented the superiority of both indomethacin and Ringer's lactate in PEP prophylaxis compared to placebo. Moreover, although some studies raise doubts about the prophylactic efficacy of indomethacin in low-risk patients, it was decided not to include a placebo arm because of ethical misgivings about not proposing a treatment with a low risk of side events, as recommended moreover by international guidelines.

Finally, the study aims to assess the occurrence of any adverse events in the two groups studied.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pancreatitis, Acute

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Indomethacin Group (Control Arm)

Patients will be randomized to receive a 100 mg indomethacin suppository will be administered immediately before the endoscopic procedure (20-30 minutes) and saline infusion will be given as needed.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Indomethacin suppository

Intervention Type DRUG

Control Group: Patients will be randomized to receive a 100 mg indomethacin suppository will be administered immediately before the endoscopic procedure (20-30 minutes) and saline infusion will be given as needed.

Indomethacin and Lactated Ringer Group (Intervention Arm)

Patients will be randomized to receive an indomethacin suppository that will be administered immediately before (20-30 minutes) the endoscopic procedure in combination with a lactated Ringer's infusion that will be administered with the following weight-based schedule: 3 cc/kg/h during ERCP, a bolus of 20 cc/kg after ERCP, and again 3 cc/kg/h for 8 hours after ERCP.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Indomethacin suppository and high-flow lactated ringer infusion combination

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Interventional group: Patients will be randomized to receive an indomethacin suppository that will be administered immediately before (20-30 minutes) the endoscopic procedure in combination with a lactated Ringer's infusion that will be administered with the following weight-based schedule: 3 cc/kg/h during ERCP, a bolus of 20 cc/kg after ERCP, and again 3 cc/kg/h for 8 hours after ERCP.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Indomethacin suppository

Control Group: Patients will be randomized to receive a 100 mg indomethacin suppository will be administered immediately before the endoscopic procedure (20-30 minutes) and saline infusion will be given as needed.

Intervention Type DRUG

Indomethacin suppository and high-flow lactated ringer infusion combination

Interventional group: Patients will be randomized to receive an indomethacin suppository that will be administered immediately before (20-30 minutes) the endoscopic procedure in combination with a lactated Ringer's infusion that will be administered with the following weight-based schedule: 3 cc/kg/h during ERCP, a bolus of 20 cc/kg after ERCP, and again 3 cc/kg/h for 8 hours after ERCP.

Intervention Type COMBINATION_PRODUCT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \> 18 years;
* All naïve patients consecutively undergoing ERCP and with any indication;
* Obtaining informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Refusal or inability to sign informed consent;
* Patients undergoing ERCP for diagnostic purposes only;
* Patients with ongoing acute pancreatitis;
* Patients with known allergy/hypersensitivity to NSAIDs;
* Patients with hypersensitivity to the active ingredients or any of the excipients of Ringer
* Lactate;
* Patients with a personal or family history of Stevens-Johnson or Lyell syndrome;
* Patients already receiving treatment with NSAIDs within 7 days prior to ERCP;
* Patients with recent gastrointestinal bleeding (less than 30 days after ERCP), or with history of recurrent bleeding/ulcer peptic ulcer or bleeding/perforation after previous NSAID treatment;
* Patients who are candidates for or have previously undergone endoscopic papillectomy;
* Patients with a positive history of recent myocardial infarction (less than 6 months after the procedure), heart failure, severe myocardial insufficiency (NYHA class \> II), respiratory failure with chronic need for oxygen therapy, known pulmonary hypertension;
* Patients with ventricular fibrillation;
* Patients with ongoing therapy with cardioactive glycosides;
* Patients with chronic renal failure (creatinine clearance values less than 40 ml/min);
* Cirrhotic patients in Child B and C class;
* Patients with severe hydro-electrolyte imbalances (hypernatremia \> 150 mEq/L, hyponatremia \< 130 mEq/L; hypercalcemia, hyperKalemia);
* Metabolic and respiratory alkalosis;
* Patients with epilepsy or Parkinson's disease;
* Patients with psychiatric disorders;
* Patients with a history of major surgery of the upper digestive tract (Billroth II, Roux-en-Y anastomosis);
* Pregnancy or lactation;
* Sarcoidosis;
* Untreated Addison's disease;
* Active proctitis of any etiology.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Azienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCS

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Romano Sassatelli

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena - Ospedale civile di Baggiovara

Baggiovara, Modena, Italy

Site Status

Azienda USL di Modena - Ospedale di Carpi

Carpi, Modena, Italy

Site Status

AUSL Bologna - Ospedale Maggiore Carlo Alberto Pizzardi

Bologna, , Italy

Site Status

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara - Arcispedale sant'Anna

Ferrara, , Italy

Site Status

AUSL della Romagna - Ospedale Morgagni-Pierantoni di Forlì

Forlì, , Italy

Site Status

Azienda Ospedaliero - Universitaria di Parma

Parma, , Italy

Site Status

Ospedale Guglielmo da Saliceto - AUSL Piacenza

Piacenza, , Italy

Site Status

AUSL Romagna - Ospedale Santa Maria delle Croci

Ravenna, , Italy

Site Status

AUSL- IRCCS di Reggio Emilia

Reggio Emilia, , Italy

Site Status

AUSL della Romagna - Ospedale Infermi di Rimini

Rimini, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RCT-PRO-PEP-INDO-RING

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.