Combination of Rectal Indomethacin and Pancreatic Duct Stenting Versus Indomethacin Alone in Preventing PEP

NCT ID: NCT04340687

Last Updated: 2020-04-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

664 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-01-01

Study Completion Date

2020-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Rectal indomethacin and pancreatic duct (PD) stenting (PDS) are recommended for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). However, the effects of the combination of the two methods on preventing PEP are controversial. We hypothesized that some group of patients with difficult cannulation might benefit from the combination of indomethacin plus PDS (IP) compared with indomethacin alone (IN).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

IP group

All patients recevied pancreatic duct stent during ERCP and one single dose of 100mg rectal indomethacin after ERCP.

Pancreatic duct stenting

Intervention Type DEVICE

A stent placed in the pancreatic duct to reduce PEP possibly by relieving pancreatic ductal hypertension that develops because of transient procedure-induced edema and stenosis of the pancreatic orifice

IN group

All patients received one single dose of 100mg rectal indomethacin after ERCP.

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pancreatic duct stenting

A stent placed in the pancreatic duct to reduce PEP possibly by relieving pancreatic ductal hypertension that develops because of transient procedure-induced edema and stenosis of the pancreatic orifice

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients underwent diagnostic or therapeutic ERCP
2. With native papilla
3. With difficult cannulation (cannulation time \>10min or cannulation attempts \>5 times or inadvertently PD cannulation ≥1)
4. Receiving post-ERCP rectal indomethacin

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with indications of PD cannulation
2. No attempt of cannulation due to inaccessible papilla
3. Non-difficult cannulation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Air Force Military Medical University, China

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yanglin Pan

Associated professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases

Xi'an, Shaanxi, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dumonceau JM, Andriulli A, Elmunzer BJ, Mariani A, Meister T, Deviere J, Marek T, Baron TH, Hassan C, Testoni PA, Kapral C; European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - updated June 2014. Endoscopy. 2014 Sep;46(9):799-815. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1377875. Epub 2014 Aug 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25148137 (View on PubMed)

Akbar A, Abu Dayyeh BK, Baron TH, Wang Z, Altayar O, Murad MH. Rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are superior to pancreatic duct stents in preventing pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a network meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Jul;11(7):778-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.12.043. Epub 2013 Jan 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23376320 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20191115-2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.