Rectal Indomethacin in the Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis

NCT ID: NCT01912716

Last Updated: 2019-07-05

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1037 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-07-31

Study Completion Date

2018-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

It is now established that indomethacin, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, at a dose of 100 mg, is effective in reducing the frequency and severity of pancreatitis (inflammation of the pancreas) after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in high risk patients. However, the optimal dose required is not known. The purpose of this study is to determine whether a dose of 200 mg, administered as rectal suppositories, is more effective than the standard dose of 100 mg. An ERCP procedure is a scope procedure where a lighted tube with a camera is passed down the patient's throat and allows for evaluation of the bile duct and/or pancreatic duct. The most common side effect of this procedure is post-ERCP pancreatitis, or swelling of the pancreas. Some patients are at higher risk for this complication than others. Our hypothesis is to compare the efficacy of these two dose regimens (100 mg vs 200 mg) of prophylactic rectally-administered indomethacin on the frequency and severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

After obtaining informed consent, subjects will undergo ERCP per clinical protocol. All procedure-related clinical decisions and interventions will be dictated by the performing physician as he or she sees fit. At the end of the procedure, it will be determined by the endoscopist and research coordinator whether the patient meets inclusion criteria. If inclusion criteria are met, subjects will be randomized by concealed allocation to receive either 100mg or 150mg indomethacin, in the form of two or three 50mg rectal suppositories. Those patients who are randomized to receive the 100mg dose will receive an additional glycerin suppository. Four hours later, those patients who were randomized to the high-dose group will then receive an additional 50mg suppository while in the recovery area. At this same time point, subjects who were randomized to the standard-dose group, will receive a glycerin suppository in the recovery area. All participating patients will receive a total of 4 suppositories.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Post-ERCP Pancreatitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

high-dose indomethacin

200mg rectal indomethacin

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

high dose indomethacin

Intervention Type DRUG

patients randomized to this intervention receive 200mg indomethacin

standard dose indomethacin

100mg rectal indomethacin

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

standard dose indomethacin

Intervention Type DRUG

patients randomized to this intervention receive 100mg indomethacin

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

high dose indomethacin

patients randomized to this intervention receive 200mg indomethacin

Intervention Type DRUG

standard dose indomethacin

patients randomized to this intervention receive 100mg indomethacin

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Indocin Indocin

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Included patients are those undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and have:

one of the following:

1. Clinical suspicion of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD; type I or II)
2. History of post-ERCP pancreatitis (at least one episode)
3. Pancreatic sphincterotomy
4. Pre-cut (access) sphincterotomy
5. greater than 8 cannulation attempts of any sphincter
6. Pneumatic dilation of intact biliary sphincter
7. Ampullectomy 8.) Assessment for post-sphincterotomy stenosis

OR at least 2 of the following:

1. Age less than 50 years old and female gender
2. History of recurrent pancreatitis (at least 2 episodes)
3. greater than or equal to to 3 pancreatic injections, with at least 1 injection to tail
4. Pancreatic acinarization (excluding ventral pancreas of pancreas divisum)
5. Pancreatic brush cytology -

Exclusion Criteria

1. Unwillingness or inability to consent for the study
2. Age less than 18 years
3. Intrauterine pregnancy
4. Breastfeeding mother
5. Standard contraindications to ERCP
6. Allergy/hypersensitivity to aspirin or Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)
7. Received NSAIDs in prior 7 days (aspirin 325mg or less ok)
8. Renal failure (serum creatinine greater than 1.4)
9. Active or recurrent (within 4 weeks) gastrointestinal hemorrhage
10. Acute pancreatitis (lipase peak) within 72 hours
11. Known chronic calcific pancreatitis
12. Pancreatic head mass
13. Procedure performed on major papilla/ventral pancreatic duct in patient with pancreas divisum (dorsal duct not attempted on injected)
14. ERCP for biliary stent removal or exchange without anticipated pancreatogram
15. Subject with prior biliary sphincterotomy now scheduled for repeat biliary therapy without anticipated pancreatogram
16. Anticipated inability to follow protocol
17. Known active cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease -
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

American College of Gastroenterology

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Michigan

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Texas

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medical University of South Carolina

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Indiana University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Evan Fogel

Professor of Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Evan L Fogel, MD, MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Indiana University Health

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Indiana University Health

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

University of Michigan Medical Center

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Methodist Dallas Medical Center

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Aurora St. Lukes' Medical Center

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fogel EL, Lehman GA, Tarnasky P, Cote GA, Schmidt SE, Waljee AK, Higgins PDR, Watkins JL, Sherman S, Kwon RSY, Elta GH, Easler JJ, Pleskow DK, Scheiman JM, El Hajj II, Guda NM, Gromski MA, McHenry L Jr, Arol S, Korsnes S, Suarez AL, Spitzer R, Miller M, Hofbauer M, Elmunzer BJ; US Cooperative for Outcomes Research in Endoscopy (USCORE). Rectal indometacin dose escalation for prevention of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in high-risk patients: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Feb;5(2):132-141. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30337-1. Epub 2019 Nov 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31780277 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ACG-CR-002-2013

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

PEP INDO 2013

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.