7 cm vs. 5 cm Pancreatic Stents for the Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis in High-risk Patients
NCT ID: NCT04145336
Last Updated: 2019-10-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
800 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-10-15
2020-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparative Effectiveness Between Indomethacin and Pancreatic Stenting in the Prevention of Post ERCP Pancreatitis
NCT03713879
The Efficacy of Pancreatic Duct Stenting With Rectal Indomethacin in Preventing Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
NCT03643900
Combination of Rectal Indomethacin and Pancreatic Duct Stenting Versus Indomethacin Alone in Preventing PEP
NCT04340687
Rectal NSAIDs With/Without PD Stent for PEP Prevention
NCT07117318
Endoscopic Pancreatic Duct Stent Placement Versus Conventional Approach in the Treatment of Early Phase Acute Pancreatitis
NCT07093996
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
5cm PDS group
All patients in this group receive 5cm 5-Fr PDS.
5cm 5-Fr PDS
High-risk patients receive 5cm 5-Fr PDS
Indomethacin
All patients without contraindications should be administrated with rectal indomethacin within 30 min before ERCP.
7cm PDS group
All patients in this group receive 7cm 5-Fr PDS.
7cm 5-Fr PDS
High-risk patients receive 7cm 5-Fr PDS
Indomethacin
All patients without contraindications should be administrated with rectal indomethacin within 30 min before ERCP.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
5cm 5-Fr PDS
High-risk patients receive 5cm 5-Fr PDS
7cm 5-Fr PDS
High-risk patients receive 7cm 5-Fr PDS
Indomethacin
All patients without contraindications should be administrated with rectal indomethacin within 30 min before ERCP.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 2 or more times;
* 1 time with more than 10 minutes cannulation.
2. Double-wire technique;
3. High-risk patients:
met at least 1 of the major criteria
* Clinical suspicion of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction;
* Pancreatic sphincterotomy
* Delayed precut sphincterotomy
* ≥ 8 cannulation attempts
* Pneumatic dilatation of an intact biliary sphincter
* Ampullectomy
or met at least 2 or more of the minor criteria
* Age \< 50;
* Female;
* Normal TBIL;
* ≥ 3 injections of contrast into the pancreatic duct with ≥ 1 injection to the tail of the pancreas;
Exclusion Criteria
* Acute pancreatitis within 3 days;
* With a history of pancreatic surgery or biliary-enteric anastomosis;
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women;
* unwilling or inability to provide consent.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Air Force Military Medical University, China
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yanglin Pan
Associated professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases
Xi’an, Shanxi, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Domagk D, Oppong KW, Aabakken L, Czako L, Gyokeres T, Manes G, Meier P, Poley JW, Ponchon T, Tringali A, Bellisario C, Minozzi S, Senore C, Bennett C, Bretthauer M, Hassan C, Kaminski MF, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Rees CJ, Spada C, Valori R, Bisschops R, Rutter MD. Performance measures for ERCP and endoscopic ultrasound: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy. 2018 Nov;50(11):1116-1127. doi: 10.1055/a-0749-8767. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
Sugimoto M, Takagi T, Suzuki R, Konno N, Asama H, Sato Y, Irie H, Watanabe K, Nakamura J, Kikuchi H, Waragai Y, Takasumi M, Hikichi T, Ohira H. Pancreatic stents for the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis should be inserted up to the pancreatic body or tail. World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jun 14;24(22):2392-2399. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i22.2392.
Olsson G, Lubbe J, Arnelo U, Jonas E, Tornqvist B, Lundell L, Enochsson L. The impact of prophylactic pancreatic stenting on post-ERCP pancreatitis: A nationwide, register-based study. United European Gastroenterol J. 2017 Feb;5(1):111-118. doi: 10.1177/2050640616645434. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KY20191010-2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.