7 cm vs. 5 cm Pancreatic Stents for the Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis in High-risk Patients

NCT ID: NCT04145336

Last Updated: 2019-10-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

800 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-10-15

Study Completion Date

2020-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Acute pancreatitis is the most common complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is estimated to be 10% to 15% in high-risk patients. Current guidelines recommend using pancreatic duct stent (PDS) for PEP prevention in high-risk patients, but it is not clear whether stent length will affect the effect of PEP prevention. The longer PDS will remain in the pancreatic duct for a longer period of time, thereby ensuring prolonged decompression with subsequent lowering of the risk for PEP. Findings from two retrospective studies showed that longer PDS was more effective in reducing the risk of post-ERCP hyperamylasemia and the frequency of PEP compared with the shorter PDS. We conducted this trial to test whether 7cm PDS was superior to 5cm PDS in PEP prevention in high-risk patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

5cm PDS group

All patients in this group receive 5cm 5-Fr PDS.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

5cm 5-Fr PDS

Intervention Type DEVICE

High-risk patients receive 5cm 5-Fr PDS

Indomethacin

Intervention Type DRUG

All patients without contraindications should be administrated with rectal indomethacin within 30 min before ERCP.

7cm PDS group

All patients in this group receive 7cm 5-Fr PDS.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

7cm 5-Fr PDS

Intervention Type DEVICE

High-risk patients receive 7cm 5-Fr PDS

Indomethacin

Intervention Type DRUG

All patients without contraindications should be administrated with rectal indomethacin within 30 min before ERCP.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

5cm 5-Fr PDS

High-risk patients receive 5cm 5-Fr PDS

Intervention Type DEVICE

7cm 5-Fr PDS

High-risk patients receive 7cm 5-Fr PDS

Intervention Type DEVICE

Indomethacin

All patients without contraindications should be administrated with rectal indomethacin within 30 min before ERCP.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Un-intentional pancreatic duct cannulation:

* 2 or more times;
* 1 time with more than 10 minutes cannulation.
2. Double-wire technique;
3. High-risk patients:

met at least 1 of the major criteria

* Clinical suspicion of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction;
* Pancreatic sphincterotomy
* Delayed precut sphincterotomy
* ≥ 8 cannulation attempts
* Pneumatic dilatation of an intact biliary sphincter
* Ampullectomy

or met at least 2 or more of the minor criteria

* Age \< 50;
* Female;
* Normal TBIL;
* ≥ 3 injections of contrast into the pancreatic duct with ≥ 1 injection to the tail of the pancreas;

Exclusion Criteria

* Therapeutic PDS;
* Acute pancreatitis within 3 days;
* With a history of pancreatic surgery or biliary-enteric anastomosis;
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women;
* unwilling or inability to provide consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Air Force Military Medical University, China

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yanglin Pan

Associated professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases

Xi’an, Shanxi, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Domagk D, Oppong KW, Aabakken L, Czako L, Gyokeres T, Manes G, Meier P, Poley JW, Ponchon T, Tringali A, Bellisario C, Minozzi S, Senore C, Bennett C, Bretthauer M, Hassan C, Kaminski MF, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Rees CJ, Spada C, Valori R, Bisschops R, Rutter MD. Performance measures for ERCP and endoscopic ultrasound: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy. 2018 Nov;50(11):1116-1127. doi: 10.1055/a-0749-8767. Epub 2018 Oct 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30340220 (View on PubMed)

Sugimoto M, Takagi T, Suzuki R, Konno N, Asama H, Sato Y, Irie H, Watanabe K, Nakamura J, Kikuchi H, Waragai Y, Takasumi M, Hikichi T, Ohira H. Pancreatic stents for the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis should be inserted up to the pancreatic body or tail. World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jun 14;24(22):2392-2399. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i22.2392.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29904246 (View on PubMed)

Olsson G, Lubbe J, Arnelo U, Jonas E, Tornqvist B, Lundell L, Enochsson L. The impact of prophylactic pancreatic stenting on post-ERCP pancreatitis: A nationwide, register-based study. United European Gastroenterol J. 2017 Feb;5(1):111-118. doi: 10.1177/2050640616645434. Epub 2016 Jul 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28405329 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KY20191010-2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Preoperative Stent Study
NCT00501176 COMPLETED NA