Post Operative Hospital at Home After Colorectal Surgery
NCT ID: NCT07113717
Last Updated: 2025-08-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-12-15
2027-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
What are the patient- and next-of-kin-related effects, as well as the clinical and organizational effects, of home-based admission? What are the implementation barriers for a full-scale randomized controlled trial? Participants will follow a standardized protocol for their care befor, during and after surgery. However, the care after surgery will be conducted at home using telemedicine.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Web-based Visit for Colorectal Surgery
NCT05084131
Postoperative Outcomes Within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol
NCT03012802
Quality of Life After Enhanced Recovery Protocol for Colorectal Surgery
NCT02824783
Anastomotic Leakage and Enhanced Recovery Pathways After Colorectal Surgery
NCT03771456
Is Life Worth Living After Major Emergency GI Surgery? Patient Reported Outcome in Elderly Emergency Surgery Patients
NCT02377687
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Feasibility of Early Post-Operative Discharge to a Virtual Hospital at Home Model for Colorectal Surgical Patients.
Purpose
Project context
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is an evidence-based approach designed to help patients recover more quickly and safely after surgery( 1) . It is widely implemented in many centres that offer minimally invasive colorectal surgery (CRS) (2,3) . This multimodal approach aims to reduce the physical and psychological stress of surgery, resulting in lower complication rates, shorter hospital stays, and reduced healthcare costs. Continuous efforts are made to implement and evaluate individual components of the ERAS protocol, ensuring that valuable aspects for patients and society are maintained and enhanced, while redundant elements are eliminated ( 1,4,5) . Optimizing all modifiable patient-related factors before surgery and adhering to standardized peri-operative care pathways is essential when striving to not only surgically remove a disease but also to ensure that patients are better off after surgery ( 6-8) .
The key question and original premise for ERAS is: "Why is the patient still in hospital" (5) . With the technical advancements and necessity brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic, a platform for virtual Hospital at Home (vHaH) was founded. Initially started as an admission-avoidance strategy for patients with acute medical conditions the concept evolved into an 'early discharge' hospital at home model and has been implemented by some elective surgical specialities (primarily orthopaedic) (9-10) .
CRS centres across the USA and Europe have been implementing Virtual Hospital or Same-Day discharge (SDD) for selected patients for the last couple of years (11-16) . Retrospective reviews and analyses of data, although inherently biased, have so far shown non-inferiority and suggested superiority regarding patient experience and safety ( 17-21) . A newly published pilot study on remote monitoring after CRC in rural areas showed feasibility and high patient acceptance ( 22) . However, there seem to be unreported barriers to generalized implementation. So far, there is only very limited documented surgical experience from sound research approaches available in the literature. This surgical feasibility study builds on methods previously tested in a medical population at the investigators' institution ( 23) . The findings will inform the development and design of a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the final telemedicine-supported vHaH model for surgical patients.
The overall aim of POPHaH is to implement a telemedicine monitoring and communication model that will enable the safe admission of postoperative patients in their homes.
A hospital based Virtual Surgical Centre (VSC) will be located in the Department of Surgery at Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand (NOH), from where medical staff will monitor and communicate with patients admitted at home. Vital parameters and patient-reported outcomes will be collected using a smartphone/tablet-based app. All data will be collected and displayed in real-time at the NOH in the VSC, allowing medical staff to monitor the vHaH patients similarly to in-patients. In addition, daily virtual ward rounds conducted by staff in the VSC and, when relevant, by medical doctors (MDs) from specialities relevant to the patients' illness(es) will ensure close communication and relevant clinical assessments.
This vHaH model is expected to become an integrated part of the hospital postoperative observation repertoire in the Capital Region of Denmark and elsewhere. In this feasibility study, hospitalized patients with surgical conditions will be offered the opportunity to continue their hospital course as a home-based admission.
Study Purpose
The objective of this feasibility study is to investigate and analyze the key factors involved in admitting adult patients undergoing CRS, including cancer surgery, in a vHaH model. The study aims to evaluate the likelihood of successfully completing the vHaH model in this patient group.
It will focus on assessing outcomes related to patients, their next of kin, clinical aspects and organizational dynamics. Additionally, it will examine factors crucial for determining the feasibility of conducting a full-scale randomized controlled trial.
Research Question
What are the patient- and next-of-kin-related effects, as well as the clinical and organisational effects, of home-based admission? What are the implementation barriers for a full-scale randomized controlled trial?
Hypothesis
The investigators hypothesize that early postoperative discharge of selected CRS patients to a telemedicine-supported vHaH model, will be a viable alternative to conventional hospitalization without compromising patient and next-of-kin safety or satisfaction.
Rationale
Virtual Hospital-at-Home (vHaH) following CRS offers numerous advantages. For patients, it promotes a faster return to normal life, encourages postoperative mobilization, reduces the risk of hospital-acquired infections, and allows recovery in the comfort of their own homes with family support. On a societal level, vHaH presents an opportunity to optimize healthcare resources, and addresses challenges posed by centralization and an aging population.
Over the past two decades, the Danish public healthcare system has undergone significant centralization, resulting in fewer, larger hospitals with a reduced bed capacity at both regional and national levels. At the same time, the aging population and increasing prevalence of multimorbidity have placed additional demands on the system. Prioritizing hospital beds without compromising the quality of care is crucial.
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways have demonstrated that postoperative recovery can be efficient and safe within hospitals. Combining ERAS principles with vHaH models, supported by research on patient safety and satisfaction, enables same-day or next-day discharge to a vHaH after CRS for selected patients.
Given that ERAS pathways were originally designed for CRS, and with nearly two decades of experience in this field, together with the clinical and scientific experience from the medical colleagues in the Department of Pulmonology and Infectious Diseases at the investigators' institution, this surgical department is uniquely positioned to pilot the model. Successfully implementing a surgical vHaH program in this patient group could serve as a blueprint for expanding the approach to other abdominal surgical subspecialities and surgical specialities, further enhancing healthcare delivery across the board. The investigators are conducting a feasibility study to thoroughly examine potential barriers to implementing surgical vHaH, including logistical challenges and patient acceptance. This approach is designed to ensure the model's sustainability and adaptability for broader application. Following this, the investigators plan to evaluate its effectiveness through a randomized controlled trial (RCT).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
virtual Hospital at Home
participants admittet to virtual Hospital at Home
virtual Hospital at Home
telemedicine set-up, virtual Hospital at Home
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
virtual Hospital at Home
telemedicine set-up, virtual Hospital at Home
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* No epidural analgesia
* No new stoma
* Bleeding \< 500 ml
* Actual condition assessed to be clinically stable
* Meeting the Chung score discharge criteria for ambulatory surgery
* Self-reliant or receives sufficient formal care to be care-independent of a primary informal caregiver
* Home-based admission will be located within catchment area of the hospital (according to the official address of the individual)
* Signed informed written and oral consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Improficiency in Danish
* Pregnancy
* Conversion to emergency surgery (uncontrolled perforation of bowel, ileus)
* Complications during surgery warranting in-hospital admission (observation in intensive care unit or close observation from other specialities, e.g. cardiology)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Nordsjaellands Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kristin Julia Steinthorsdottir
Surgeon, ph.d.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kristin J Steinthorsdottir, MD, Ph.d.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Nordsjaellands Hospital, Surgical Department
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Surgery
Hillerød, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Vu MM, Curfman KR, Blair GE, Shah CA, Rashidi L. Beyond enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS): Evolving minimally invasive colectomy from multi-day admissions to same-day discharge. Am J Surg. 2023 May;225(5):826-831. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.01.024. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
Nikmanesh P, Arabloo J, Gorji HA. Dimensions and components of hospital-at-home care: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 25;24(1):1458. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11970-5.
Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, Demartines N, Roulin D, Francis N, McNaught CE, MacFie J, Liberman AS, Soop M, Hill A, Kennedy RH, Lobo DN, Fearon K, Ljungqvist O; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr. 2012 Dec;31(6):783-800. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.013. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
100100100
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.