Managing Impact-related Leakage During Exercise Using Intravaginal Support

NCT ID: NCT07103161

Last Updated: 2025-08-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-09-13

Study Completion Date

2026-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of using a regular menstrual tampon or a Uresta pessary to reduce urine leakage associated with running-induced stress urinary incontinence (RI-SUI) in females aged 18 and older. Secondly, the study aims to assess whether either intervention mitigates transient changes in pelvic morphology that occur following a single running bout. Lastly, we aim to evaluate whether participants continue using either intervention during running over the 4-week period following their in-lab participation. The hypotheses are:

Hypothesis 1: Among females with RI-SUI, both a tampon and pessary used during a single running bout will reduce urinary leakage symptoms, with greater symptom reduction observed when using the pessary.

Hypothesis 2: Participants will report high satisfaction and perceived symptom improvement with both the tampon and pessary, with higher satisfaction and greater improvement reported for the pessary.

Hypothesis 3: Both the tampon and pessary will reduce pelvic floor strain incurred by the end of the run, as evidenced by less bladder neck descent, levator plate lengthening, and levator hiatus area increasing relative to that observed when no tampon or pessary is used.

Hypothesis 4: A greater proportion of participants will report continued use of the pessary compared to the tampon over the 4-week post-lab period, with higher frequency of use and fewer reported discontinuations.

We will perform within-subject comparisons against baseline values to determine the effect of each intervention on RI-SUI symptoms and pelvic organ support.

Participants will complete a baseline questionnaire to collect demographic information and assess incontinence severity. They will then attend three laboratory visits within a 10-day period. At each visit, bladder volume will be standardized to between 100 and 200mL, then the participant will undergo three-dimensional (3D) transperineal ultrasound imaging conducted in a standing position. Following imaging, participants will complete a treadmill protocol consisting of 25-minutes running at a moderately difficult pace (rated at 13 - 14 on the Borg Perceiver Rate of Exertion scale), followed by 5 minutes of running at a higher intensity pace. During the run, participants will be asked at 5 minute intervals whether they experienced any urine leakage and to report their perceived amount of leakage. The ultrasound image protocol will be repeated immediately after the run.

Participants will be allowed to keep the pessary and will be contacted 4-weeks after the final visit to evaluate whether or not they continued use of a tampon or the pessary, and, if so, we will ask them to report their satisfaction with the intervention(s) they used.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

More than 30% of females experience urinary incontinence (UI) during exercise. For many women, urine leakage during exercise can become a barrier to staying active, leading them to modify their exercise routine or avoid triggering activities altogether. Beyond the physical inconvenience, urinary incontinence can affect self-esteem, social participation, and mental health. Helping women stay active without embarrassment or fear of leakage has both physical and psychological benefits.

The pelvic floor muscles (PFMs) and associated connective tissues play a critical role in continence control. These structures support the pelvic organs and help maintain their positioning such that the urethra is optimally compressed during increases in intra-abdominal pressure. Dysfunction of the PFMs and connective tissues will cause the bladder to descend during weight-bearing activities, and the urethra, no longer in its optimal position, may remain open - resulting in urine leakage. This form of UI, known as stress urinary incontinence (SUI), is commonly experienced as urine leakage during tasks such as coughing, laughing, and physical activity. High-impact movements like running, jumping, and inclined walking are known to increase the loads experienced by the pelvic floor, making SUI especially common during these types of activities.

Intravaginal products such as tampons and pessaries (reusable medical devices placed in the vagina) are recommended to help manage UI during everyday activities such as coughing and sneezing. However, their effectiveness during physical activities - such as running or brisk walking - remains unclear. This study aims to determine whether a standard menstrual tampon and/or a bladder support (Uresta) pessary can reduce urine leakage during running and/or brisk walking in active females. A secondary objective is to assess whether these devices mitigate the descent of the bladder that we have observed in females after running or brisk walking. Lastly, we aim to assess continued device use over a 4-week period following all laboratory visits.

By evaluating the effectiveness of accessible, non-invasive devices, this research may offer immediate, low-barrier strategies to help active women self-manage urinary incontinence - empowering them to maintain their physical activity routines and support their long-term health.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

This is an assessor blind randomized crossover study design in which all participants complete a baseline visit and are then repeat the protocol at two subsequent visits, one with the tampon and one with the pessary, with the order randomized.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Tampon Visit: run with tampon

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Sportex regular tampon

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants will use a regular absorbency Sportex tampon as a conservative intravaginal support to potentially reduce stress urinary incontinence (SUI) symptoms during running. Participants will be instructed to insert the tampon prior to running into the mid-to-upper vaginal canal while standing or sitting.

Pessary Visit: run with pessary

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Uresta bladder support device

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Uresta bladder support device is an intravaginal device indicated for adult women over 18 years of age who experience stress urinary incontinence, including urine leakage during exercise and non-exercise activities such as coughing and laughing. The device is FDA-cleared and licensed by Health Canada. Participants receive the entire kit that includes the three most common sizes which fit 90% of women. Two additional sizes are available in the lab if needed. Participants will be instructed to self-insert the Uresta prior to running, following the manufacturer instructions with researcher guidance as needed. The device aims to provide mechanical support to the urethra and bladder neck to prevent urine leakage during activities that provoke leakage.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Uresta bladder support device

The Uresta bladder support device is an intravaginal device indicated for adult women over 18 years of age who experience stress urinary incontinence, including urine leakage during exercise and non-exercise activities such as coughing and laughing. The device is FDA-cleared and licensed by Health Canada. Participants receive the entire kit that includes the three most common sizes which fit 90% of women. Two additional sizes are available in the lab if needed. Participants will be instructed to self-insert the Uresta prior to running, following the manufacturer instructions with researcher guidance as needed. The device aims to provide mechanical support to the urethra and bladder neck to prevent urine leakage during activities that provoke leakage.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sportex regular tampon

Participants will use a regular absorbency Sportex tampon as a conservative intravaginal support to potentially reduce stress urinary incontinence (SUI) symptoms during running. Participants will be instructed to insert the tampon prior to running into the mid-to-upper vaginal canal while standing or sitting.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Uresta pessary Menstrual tampon

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \>18 years of age
* Participate in any exercise or sport modality involving running or brisk walking
* Experiences urine leakage during running or brisk walking
* Speak and read English or French

Exclusion Criteria

* No urine leakage in the first laboratory assessment (baseline / no intervention)
* Currently pregnant or have been pregnant in the previous 6 months
* Had or have had cardiac, pulmonary, metabolic and/or neurological conditions
* History of incontinence surgery
* Hysterectomy
* Symptoms consistent with urgency incontinence only
* Experience pain with tampon use or during gynecologic examinations
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Ottawa

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Linda McLean

Full Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Linda McLean, PhD.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Ottawa

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Ottawa, Faculty of Health Sciences building, 200 Lees Avenue

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Grace Collins, BSc.

Role: CONTACT

613-562-5800 ext. 4102

Anne-Marie Lake, MSc.

Role: CONTACT

613-562-5800 ext. 4102

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Grace Collins, BSc.

Role: primary

613-562-5800 ext. 4102

Anne-Marie Lake, MSc.

Role: backup

613-562-5800 ext. 4102

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Raizada V, Mittal RK. Pelvic floor anatomy and applied physiology. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2008 Sep;37(3):493-509, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2008.06.003.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18793993 (View on PubMed)

Petter Rodrigues M, Berube ME, Charette M, McLean L. Conservative interventions for female exercise-induced urinary incontinence: a systematic review. BJU Int. 2024 Dec;134(6):906-917. doi: 10.1111/bju.16474. Epub 2024 Jul 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 39043585 (View on PubMed)

Lovatsis D, Best C, Diamond P. Short-term Uresta efficacy (SURE) study: a randomized controlled trial of the Uresta continence device. Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Jan;28(1):147-150. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3090-9. Epub 2016 Jul 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27438055 (View on PubMed)

Leitner M, Moser H, Eichelberger P, Kuhn A, Baeyens JP, Radlinger L. Evaluation of pelvic floor kinematics in continent and incontinent women during running: An exploratory study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Feb;37(2):609-618. doi: 10.1002/nau.23340. Epub 2017 Jul 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28675537 (View on PubMed)

Farrell SA, Baydock S, Amir B, Fanning C. Effectiveness of a new self-positioning pessary for the management of urinary incontinence in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 May;196(5):474.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.11.038.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17466709 (View on PubMed)

Falah-Hassani K, Reeves J, Shiri R, Hickling D, McLean L. The pathophysiology of stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Mar;32(3):501-552. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04622-9. Epub 2021 Jan 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33416968 (View on PubMed)

Dakic JG, Hay-Smith J, Cook J, Lin KY, Calo M, Frawley H. Effect of Pelvic Floor Symptoms on Women's Participation in Exercise: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review With Meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Jul;51(7):345-361. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2021.10200. Epub 2021 May 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33971737 (View on PubMed)

Berube ME, McLean L. The acute effects of running on pelvic floor morphology and function in runners with and without running-induced stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Jan;35(1):127-138. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05674-3. Epub 2023 Nov 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37991566 (View on PubMed)

Waetjen LE, Subak LL, Shen H, Lin F, Wang TH, Vittinghoff E, Brown JS. Stress urinary incontinence surgery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Apr;101(4):671-6. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)03124-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12681869 (View on PubMed)

Serdar CC, Cihan M, Yucel D, Serdar MA. Sample size, power and effect size revisited: simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2021 Feb 15;31(1):010502. doi: 10.11613/BM.2021.010502. Epub 2020 Dec 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33380887 (View on PubMed)

Shaw JM, Hamad NM, Coleman TJ, Egger MJ, Hsu Y, Hitchcock R, Nygaard IE. Intra-abdominal pressures during activity in women using an intra-vaginal pressure transducer. J Sports Sci. 2014;32(12):1176-85. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2014.889845. Epub 2014 Feb 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24575741 (View on PubMed)

Rzymski P, Burzynski B, Knapik M, Kociszewski J, Wilczak M. How to balance the treatment of stress urinary incontinence among female athletes? Arch Med Sci. 2020 Oct 21;17(2):314-322. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2020.100139. eCollection 2021.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33747266 (View on PubMed)

Nygaard I, Girts T, Fultz NH, Kinchen K, Pohl G, Sternfeld B. Is urinary incontinence a barrier to exercise in women? Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Aug;106(2):307-14. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000168455.39156.0f.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16055580 (View on PubMed)

Nekkanti S, Wu JM, Hundley AF, Hudson C, Pandya LK, Dieter AA. A randomized trial comparing continence pessary to continence device (Poise Impressa(R)) for stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Apr;33(4):861-868. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04967-9. Epub 2021 Sep 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34505171 (View on PubMed)

Imamura M, Williams K, Wells M, McGrother C. Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of urinary incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 2;2015(12):CD003505. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003505.pub5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26630349 (View on PubMed)

Goldstick O, Constantini N. Urinary incontinence in physically active women and female athletes. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;48(4):296-8. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091880. Epub 2013 May 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23687004 (View on PubMed)

Duenas-Garcia OF, Shapiro RE, Gaccione P. Safety and Efficacy of a Disposable Vaginal Device for Stress Urinary Incontinence. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jun 1;27(6):360-364. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000861.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32453209 (View on PubMed)

Chisholm L, Delpe S, Priest T, Reynolds WS. Physical Activity and Stress Incontinence in Women. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep. 2019 Sep;14(3):174-179. doi: 10.1007/s11884-019-00519-6. Epub 2019 Jul 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31456864 (View on PubMed)

Brown WJ, Miller YD. Too wet to exercise? Leaking urine as a barrier to physical activity in women. J Sci Med Sport. 2001 Dec;4(4):373-8. doi: 10.1016/s1440-2440(01)80046-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11905931 (View on PubMed)

Brennand E, Ruiz-Mirazo E, Tang S, Kim-Fine S; Calgary Women's Pelvic Health Research Group. Urinary leakage during exercise: problematic activities, adaptive behaviors, and interest in treatment for physically active Canadian women. Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Apr;29(4):497-503. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3409-1. Epub 2017 Jul 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28685262 (View on PubMed)

Bo K. Urinary incontinence, pelvic floor dysfunction, exercise and sport. Sports Med. 2004;34(7):451-64. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200434070-00004.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15233598 (View on PubMed)

Al-Shaikh G, Syed S, Osman S, Bogis A, Al-Badr A. Pessary use in stress urinary incontinence: a review of advantages, complications, patient satisfaction, and quality of life. Int J Womens Health. 2018 Apr 17;10:195-201. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S152616. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29713205 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H-06-22-8153

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Compression Stockings in Ankle Sprain
NCT01259752 COMPLETED PHASE3