LINX vs Fundoplication

NCT ID: NCT07093359

Last Updated: 2025-08-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

460 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-03-06

Study Completion Date

2029-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Reflux disease can severely impact upon quality-of-life and lead to complications, including ulceration of the oesophagus. It is often controlled with self-help measures and medication. However, sometimes surgery is recommended. The current standard surgical treatment is called a fundoplication. This operation is carried out through keyhole (laparoscopic) surgery, and tightens the lower oesophagus to prevent reflux. Fundoplication is very safe and improves the quality-of-life of most patients. However, many patients have gas bloating, difficulty swallowing and recurrence of their reflux symptoms. As an alternative, some surgeons use a device called LINX, using a keyhole procedure. LINX is a magnetic device that wraps around the lower oesophagus to prevent reflux. Studies suggest that LINX may cause fewer complications, with a similar improvement in quality-of-life. However, there is a need for better evidence to compare LINX with fundoplication in the surgical treatment of reflux disease. GOLF is a multi-centre study designed which to determine if LINX achieves similar reflux control and improves symptoms compared to fundoplication. GOLF measures: (1) quality of life,(2) surgical complications, including need for additional treatment, (3) financial cost-effectiveness and (4) objectively measure the presence of acid that has refluxed into the lower oesophagus. GOLF aims randomise 460 patients to receive fundoplication or the LINX device. It will be conducted across at least 16 UK and 7 European specialist surgical centres. All participants will be followed up at 6 weeks, 6, 12 and 24 months to assess which treatment offers the best results after surgery. A quality assurance programme within participating centres will ensure that procedures are completed to a high-quality standard. Study results will incorporate a patient and public involvement programme, which will inform national and international guidelines for the surgical treatment of reflux disease.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Laparoscopic or robotic fundoplication

Participants randomised to laparoscopic or robotic fundoplication will receive surgical treatment for managing GORD including a total or partial fundic wrap behind or in front of the distal oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Laparoscopic or robotic fundoplication

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Participants randomised to laparoscopic or robotic fundoplication will receive surgical treatment for managing GORD including a total or partial fundic wrap behind or in front of the distal oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction.

Laparoscopic or robotic LINX procedure

Participants randomised to laparoscopic or robotic magnetic sphincter augmentation (LINX procedure) will receive surgical treatment under general anaesthesia, with placement of the LINX device around the distal oesophagus. The LINX device comprises titanium beads with magnets in the centre.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Laparoscopic or robotic LINX procedure

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Participants randomised to laparoscopic or robotic magnetic sphincter augmentation (LINX procedure) will receive surgical treatment under general anaesthesia, with placement of the LINX device around the distal oesophagus. The LINX device comprises titanium beads with magnets in the centre.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Laparoscopic or robotic LINX procedure

Participants randomised to laparoscopic or robotic magnetic sphincter augmentation (LINX procedure) will receive surgical treatment under general anaesthesia, with placement of the LINX device around the distal oesophagus. The LINX device comprises titanium beads with magnets in the centre.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic or robotic fundoplication

Participants randomised to laparoscopic or robotic fundoplication will receive surgical treatment for managing GORD including a total or partial fundic wrap behind or in front of the distal oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age 18 years and above
2. Willing and able to give informed consent
3. Patients with GORD insufficiently controlled by medical therapy or intolerance to medical therapy being considered for anti-reflux surgery
4. Symptomatic and objectively defined GORD; endoscopy with appearances or biopsies consistent with reflux oesophagitis, or 24-hour pH study or BRAVO test of the oesophagus consistent with GORD
5. No hiatal hernia or hiatal hernia \<5 cm in length
6. Adequate lower oesophageal motility as defined by preoperative oesophageal manometry study. Oesophageal manometry will show a mean contractile amplitude of \>30 mmHg or DCI \>450 mmHg-s-cm in 70% of swallows.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Unsuitable for surgical intervention due to medical conditions precluding general anaesthesia
2. Suspected or known allergies to titanium, stainless steel, nickel, or ferrous materials
3. Previous anti-reflux or gastric surgery
4. Previous or planned neurosurgical intervention
5. Oesophageal manometry showing complete absence of lower oesophageal contractility
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

King's College London

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Imperial College London

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Bristol

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Southampton

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Oxford

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, Guy's and St Thomas's Hospital

Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom

Site Status RECRUITING

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St Mary's Hospital

Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom

Site Status RECRUITING

Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital

Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom

Site Status RECRUITING

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Churchill Hospital

Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom

Site Status RECRUITING

University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust

Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Sheraz Markar, PhD, FRCS, MSc, MA

Role: CONTACT

+44 07584039433

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

James Gossage

Role: primary

Ahmed Ahmed

Role: primary

Andy Cockbain

Role: primary

Sheraz Markar

Role: primary

Fergus Noble

Role: primary

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NIHR152268

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

ISRCTN 13533177

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

IRAS 331404

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Fundoplication in Laparoscopic PEH Repair Based on FLIP
NCT05807763 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
Light Endoscopic Robot Use in Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT00828035 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3