Comparison of Laparoscopic Nissen Versus Thal Fundoplication in Children

NCT ID: NCT01027975

Last Updated: 2009-12-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1998-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Laparoscopic fundoplication is increasingly performed in paediatric surgery. Many types of fundoplication are performed, each has advantages and disadvantages. The Nissen operation is the most frequently performed procedure in the U.K., however it can be associated with post-operative dysphagia. The relative benefits between Nissen and other fundoplication techniques in children are still uncertain.

The aim of our study was to compare the long-term outcomes following laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with laparoscopic Thal fundoplication in children.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

laparoscopy fundoplication Nissen Thal children operative treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in children

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

laparoscopic Nissen/laparoscopic Thal

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Gastro-oesophageal reflux unresponsive to medical treatment, or those who had serious complications (e.g. apnoea, aspiration pneumonia, oesophagitis)

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who had previous anti-reflux surgery, previous open abdominal surgery, if parents declined to participate into study
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Month

Maximum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Department of Paediatric Surgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, U.K.

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hugh W Grant, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

John Radcliffe Hospital, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Oxford,United Kingdom

Rainer Kubiak, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

John Radcliffe Hospital, Department of Paediatric Surgery, Oxford, United Kingdom

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Paediatric Surgery, John Radcliffe Hospital NHS Trust

Oxford (Headington), Oxford, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kubiak R, Andrews J, Grant HW. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic nissen fundoplication compared with laparoscopic thal fundoplication in children: a prospective, randomized study. Ann Surg. 2011 Jan;253(1):44-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181fc98a0.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21233605 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RKubiak

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id