Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
97 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-01-01
2025-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Dimensional Changes of Peri-implant Facial Bone
NCT01821092
Analysising the Marginal Bone Loss, Torque and Implant Stability Placed in Bone and Tissue Level Dental Implants
NCT07288606
Evaluation of Implant Stability Changes in Sites Prepared with Different Osseodensification Techniques: a Prospective Observational Clinical Study
NCT06679894
Differences Between Two Type Implants in Post-extraction Alveolus
NCT05665231
Buccal and Palatal Bone Thickness and Marginal Bone Changes Implants
NCT05632172
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
\*\*Marginal Bone Loss (MBL)\*\* is a key parameter in assessing the long-term stability of implants and is measured as a reduction in the height of the marginal bone around the implant. The \*\*Pink Esthetic Score (PES)\*\*, on the other hand, qualitatively evaluates the aesthetic outcome of the peri-implant soft tissues by considering parameters such as the shape and fullness of the papilla, the contour of the soft tissues, and the color of the mucosa in relation to the prosthesis.
This \*\*retrospective study\*\* aims to evaluate, in a cohort of patients, the effectiveness of the convergent transmucosal profile of dental implants with respect to bone stability and aesthetic outcomes.
\*\*Study Aim\*\* The main objective of the study is to analyze the \*\*long-term stability\*\* of Marginal Bone Level (MBL) and the Pink Esthetic Score (PES) in a retrospective cohort of patients treated with implants featuring a convergent transmucosal profile. The study intends to identify correlations between aesthetic parameters and bone stability, also evaluating the clinical implications of this implant design.
\*\*Materials and Methods\*\*
\*\*Study Design\*\* The study will be retrospective, based on the analysis of medical records and radiographic data collected in a standardized manner. Selected patients received at least one implant with a convergent transmucosal profile and were followed for \*\*at least 10 years\*\*.
\*\*Inclusion Criteria\*\*
* Adult patients aged between 18 and 75 years.
* Presence of at least one periapical radiograph taken at the time of implant placement and another at 1-2 years, 3-6 years, and 7-10 years after insertion.
* Photographic documentation for PES assessments performed at prosthetic loading and during follow-ups.
\*\*Exclusion Criteria\*\*
* Patients with uncompensated systemic diseases (uncontrolled diabetes, severe autoimmune diseases).
* Heavy smokers (\>10 cigarettes per day).
* Incomplete clinical and radiographic documentation.
\*\*Description of the Convergent Transmucosal Profile\*\* The convergent transmucosal profile is characterized by a design that reduces the bulk of the implant neck near the soft tissues. This configuration promotes the coronal migration of collagen fibers, creating a biological seal that helps preserve the bone margin and support the soft tissues, thereby improving aesthetic outcomes.
\*\*Data Collection\*\*
1. \*\*MBL Measurement:\*\* Marginal Bone Loss will be measured using standardized periapical radiographs, with dedicated software such as ImageJ, assessing the distance between the edge of the implant platform and the first bone contact.
2. \*\*PES Evaluation:\*\* The Pink Esthetic Score will be calculated by analyzing photographic images, considering parameters such as the fullness and shape of the papillae, the contour of the soft tissues, mucosal color, and the overall aesthetic integration.
\*\*Sample Size Calculation\*\* The sample size was calculated assuming a clinically relevant difference of 0.5 mm in MBL with a standard deviation of 0.3 mm. With a significance level of 5% and a power of 80%, at least 45 subjects are required. To account for possible dropouts during follow-up, the sample will be increased by 20%, bringing the minimum number to 54 patients.
\*\*Statistical Analysis\*\* Data will be analyzed using SPSS software. Continuous variables will be expressed as means and standard deviations. The data analysis will be conducted using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) to manage the dependence between repeated measurements over time. The correlation between MBL and PES will be assessed using the Pearson coefficient. A p-value less than 0.05 will be considered significant.
\*\*Ethical Considerations\*\* The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All clinical and radiographic data will be anonymized to ensure patient privacy. No additional interventions are planned, and the study does not pose risks to participants.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dental implant placement
Implant site prepared through a consecutive drilling procedure in the maxilla or the mandible, implant placed.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Presence of at least one periapical radiograph taken at the time of implant placement and another at 1-2 years, 3-6 years, and 7-10 years after insertion.
* Photographic documentation for PES assessments performed at prosthetic loading and during follow-ups.
Exclusion Criteria
* Heavy smokers (\>10 cigarettes per day).
* Incomplete clinical and radiographic documentation.
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Cagliari
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nicola Alberto Valente, DDS, MS, PhD
Associate Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cagliari University Hospital
Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Biotype retro
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.