Video-Assisted Informed Consent for Neonatal Lumbar Puncture
NCT ID: NCT07074925
Last Updated: 2025-07-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-10-01
2025-11-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Bedside Ultrasound Assistance on the Proportion of Successful Infant Spinal Taps
NCT02133066
The Effectiveness of a Pediatric Lumbar Puncture Restraint Device
NCT00980070
Intravenous Fluid Administration's Effect on Pediatric Lumbar Puncture
NCT05302765
Ultrasound Assisted Lumbar Puncture in the Neonate
NCT02918149
Ultrasound vs Palpation for Infant Lumbar Puncture
NCT02373774
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Despite the importance of obtaining informed consent for neonatal LPs, there is a notable lack of research on the effectiveness of alternative methods for communicating this information, such as video-assisted consent. Video-based interventions have been shown to improve patient understanding and satisfaction in other medical contexts and may provide a more engaging and easily accessible means of conveying complex information related to the neonatal lumbar puncture procedure. Integrating video-assisted consent into the process could potentially enhance parent comprehension, decision-making, and satisfaction with the consent process.
The purpose of this study is to explore the effectiveness of video-assisted neonatal lumbar puncture consent processes against a conventional consent discussion to inform parents about pediatric lumbar puncture in the pediatric ED. We hypothesize that having a visual aid in addition to the verbal information presented in the consent process will lead to increased parent comprehension, decision-making, and satisfaction with the consent process. Furthermore, the findings from this study may have broader implications for improving the informed consent process for other medical procedures and interventions in pediatric settings.
A video-assisted informed consent intervention will be implemented in the Dell Children's Medical Center (DCMC) Emergency Department (ED). Parents whose children are recommended for LP will be randomly selected to receive either standard informed consent procedures or video-assisted informed consent. We plan to enroll 100 participants. The intervention group (n=50) will receive procedure information via a video and the control group (n=50) will receive standard procedure explanation. The 2-minute video (available in English or Spanish) will use animation to explain the neonatal LP procedure, benefits, and risks.
All participants will complete brief knowledge surveys after the intervention and will be asked to provide feedback on their satisfaction with the informed consent process. Pediatric emergency medicine physicians at Dell Children's collaborated to create the knowledge surveys using the Delphi method. The primary outcome to be assessed is the efficacy of the video intervention on parents' comprehension compared to the conventional discussion. Secondary outcomes will focus on parental satisfaction with the informed consent process and the rate of consent refusal.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Video assisted consent
The intervention group (n=50) will receive procedure information via a video explanation. The 2-minute video (available in English or Spanish) will use animation to explain the neonatal LP procedure, benefits, and risks.
Video assisted informed consent
The 2-minute video (available in English or Spanish) will use animation to explain the neonatal LP procedure, benefits, and risks.
Standard consent
The control group (n=50) will receive standard procedure explanation.
Standard consent
The standard consent group will receive usual procedure description and consent.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Video assisted informed consent
The 2-minute video (available in English or Spanish) will use animation to explain the neonatal LP procedure, benefits, and risks.
Standard consent
The standard consent group will receive usual procedure description and consent.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Caregiver fluent in English or Spanish
Exclusion Criteria
* Parent/guardian unwilling to complete surveys
0 Months
7 Months
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Texas at Austin
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lina Palomares
Project Manager
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Matthew Wilkinson, MD, MPH
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
The University of Texas at Austin
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dell Children's Medical Center
Austin, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Spencer SP, Stoner MJ, Kelleher K, Cohen DM. Using a Multimedia Presentation to Enhance Informed Consent in a Pediatric Emergency Department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2015 Aug;31(8):572-6. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000513.
Richardson V. Patient comprehension of informed consent. J Perioper Pract. 2013 Jan-Feb;23(1-2):26-30. doi: 10.1177/1750458913023001-204.
Sherlock A, Brownie S. Patients' recollection and understanding of informed consent: a literature review. ANZ J Surg. 2014 Apr;84(4):207-10. doi: 10.1111/ans.12555.
COMMITTEE ON BIOETHICS. Informed Consent in Decision-Making in Pediatric Practice. Pediatrics. 2016 Aug;138(2):e20161484. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-1484.
Leazer RC. Evaluation and Management of Young Febrile Infants: An Overview of the New AAP Guideline. Pediatr Rev. 2023 Mar 1;44(3):127-138. doi: 10.1542/pir.2022-005624.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
00004883
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.