Video-Assisted Informed Consent for Neonatal Lumbar Puncture

NCT ID: NCT07074925

Last Updated: 2025-07-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-10-01

Study Completion Date

2025-11-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to explore the effectiveness of video-assisted neonatal lumbar puncture consent processes against a conventional consent discussion to inform parents about pediatric lumbar puncture in the pediatric ED. We hypothesize that having a visual aid in addition to the verbal information presented in the consent process will lead to increased parent comprehension, decision-making, and satisfaction with the consent process. Furthermore, the findings from this study may have broader implications for improving the informed consent process for other medical procedures and interventions in pediatric settings.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A neonatal lumbar puncture (LP), also known as a spinal tap, is a critical diagnostic procedure for detecting and managing serious infections such as meningitis in newborns. Ensuring that parents and caregivers fully understand the procedure, its risks, and its benefits is an essential aspect of the informed consent process. Traditionally, healthcare providers have relied on verbal and written methods to communicate this information to parents, aiming to facilitate comprehension and obtain consent for the procedure. However, there is growing evidence that these traditional methods may not always be sufficient in providing parents with a comprehensive understanding of the procedure, which could potentially impact the decision-making process and overall satisfaction with the care provided. After conventional consent discussions, parents are still often not aware of what the procedure will entail, the risks, how long the procedure will take, and what outcomes to expect. Language barriers can also contribute to misunderstandings during the consent process, even with the assistance of translation services.

Despite the importance of obtaining informed consent for neonatal LPs, there is a notable lack of research on the effectiveness of alternative methods for communicating this information, such as video-assisted consent. Video-based interventions have been shown to improve patient understanding and satisfaction in other medical contexts and may provide a more engaging and easily accessible means of conveying complex information related to the neonatal lumbar puncture procedure. Integrating video-assisted consent into the process could potentially enhance parent comprehension, decision-making, and satisfaction with the consent process.

The purpose of this study is to explore the effectiveness of video-assisted neonatal lumbar puncture consent processes against a conventional consent discussion to inform parents about pediatric lumbar puncture in the pediatric ED. We hypothesize that having a visual aid in addition to the verbal information presented in the consent process will lead to increased parent comprehension, decision-making, and satisfaction with the consent process. Furthermore, the findings from this study may have broader implications for improving the informed consent process for other medical procedures and interventions in pediatric settings.

A video-assisted informed consent intervention will be implemented in the Dell Children's Medical Center (DCMC) Emergency Department (ED). Parents whose children are recommended for LP will be randomly selected to receive either standard informed consent procedures or video-assisted informed consent. We plan to enroll 100 participants. The intervention group (n=50) will receive procedure information via a video and the control group (n=50) will receive standard procedure explanation. The 2-minute video (available in English or Spanish) will use animation to explain the neonatal LP procedure, benefits, and risks.

All participants will complete brief knowledge surveys after the intervention and will be asked to provide feedback on their satisfaction with the informed consent process. Pediatric emergency medicine physicians at Dell Children's collaborated to create the knowledge surveys using the Delphi method. The primary outcome to be assessed is the efficacy of the video intervention on parents' comprehension compared to the conventional discussion. Secondary outcomes will focus on parental satisfaction with the informed consent process and the rate of consent refusal.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lumbar Puncture Pediatrics Emergency Department Patient Informed Consent

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Video assisted consent

The intervention group (n=50) will receive procedure information via a video explanation. The 2-minute video (available in English or Spanish) will use animation to explain the neonatal LP procedure, benefits, and risks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Video assisted informed consent

Intervention Type OTHER

The 2-minute video (available in English or Spanish) will use animation to explain the neonatal LP procedure, benefits, and risks.

Standard consent

The control group (n=50) will receive standard procedure explanation.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard consent

Intervention Type OTHER

The standard consent group will receive usual procedure description and consent.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Video assisted informed consent

The 2-minute video (available in English or Spanish) will use animation to explain the neonatal LP procedure, benefits, and risks.

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard consent

The standard consent group will receive usual procedure description and consent.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children, age 0-7 months old who are recommended for lumbar puncture procedure during an ED visit.
* Caregiver fluent in English or Spanish

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous enrollment in the study, i.e., the patient has been previously part of the current LP study. This will be confirmed by the study coordinator, PI, or co-I.
* Parent/guardian unwilling to complete surveys
Minimum Eligible Age

0 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

7 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Texas at Austin

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lina Palomares

Project Manager

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Matthew Wilkinson, MD, MPH

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

The University of Texas at Austin

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dell Children's Medical Center

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Spencer SP, Stoner MJ, Kelleher K, Cohen DM. Using a Multimedia Presentation to Enhance Informed Consent in a Pediatric Emergency Department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2015 Aug;31(8):572-6. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000513.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26221786 (View on PubMed)

Richardson V. Patient comprehension of informed consent. J Perioper Pract. 2013 Jan-Feb;23(1-2):26-30. doi: 10.1177/1750458913023001-204.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23413533 (View on PubMed)

Sherlock A, Brownie S. Patients' recollection and understanding of informed consent: a literature review. ANZ J Surg. 2014 Apr;84(4):207-10. doi: 10.1111/ans.12555.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24812707 (View on PubMed)

COMMITTEE ON BIOETHICS. Informed Consent in Decision-Making in Pediatric Practice. Pediatrics. 2016 Aug;138(2):e20161484. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-1484.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27456514 (View on PubMed)

Leazer RC. Evaluation and Management of Young Febrile Infants: An Overview of the New AAP Guideline. Pediatr Rev. 2023 Mar 1;44(3):127-138. doi: 10.1542/pir.2022-005624.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36854834 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

00004883

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.