Lumbar Puncture Stylet Technique in Children

NCT ID: NCT05009173

Last Updated: 2022-10-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

395 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-09-21

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Lumbar puncture (LP) is a procedure performed frequently among children in the emergency department (ED). Although it has been performed for decades, and for distinct indications, the technique itself can often lead to traumatic results, which can complicate its interpretation and lead to over-treatments and hospitalizations. Several factors have been suggested to improve the success rate of LPs. Among them, the stylet-out (SO), also known as the early stylet removal technique, has been suggested but not properly studied.

The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the stylet-out technique can reduce the probability of failure or traumatic lumbar puncture procedures in a pediatric population presenting to the emergency department as compared to the standard stylet-in (SI) approach.

To achieve this goal, the investigator will conduct a randomized controlled trial comparing the SO versus SI techniques in a tertiary care, pediatric, university-affiliated emergency. All children younger than 18 years of age requiring a LP as part of their ED workup will be eligible and randomized to either the standard SI or SO group. The primary outcome will be the first-attempt LP success rate as defined by the minimum amount of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) necessary to perform a leukocyte count and bacterial/viral CSF cultures, according to each laboratory with red blood cell count \< 1000/mm3. Secondary outcomes will include the following: overall LP success rate (i.e. despite number of attempts), proportion of traumatic LP, number of LP attempts, number of changes in providers performing the LP, proportion of traumatic LP, total time to procedure, mean difference in pain scores and satisfaction rates in both groups.

The hypothesis is that the use of the Stylet Out approach will reduce the number of failed and traumatic LP in the pediatric population presenting to the ED as compared to the standard SI approach.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Traumatic Tap

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Stylet-in

Lumbar puncture performed keeping the stylet inside the needle until the practitioner reaches the appropriate location.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lumbar puncture using the stylet-in technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

This method consists of inserting the needle with the stylet-in, then only remove the stylet once the desired depth is achieved and CSF flow is expected. If no CSF comes back, the stylet is replaced before continuing to advance the needle until the subarachnoid space is entered. This is the technique generally used in our emergency department and will serve as the control treatment group.

Stylet-out

The practitioner remove the stylet once he/she has passed the skin and moves the needle forward with the stylet.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lumbar puncture using the stylet-out technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

This method consists of inserting the needle through the epidermis and the dermis, which is estimated as a 0.5 to 1 cm length in children, then remove the stylet before progressing through the other structures until the subarachnoid space is entered. This approach will be used in the experimental technique group.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lumbar puncture using the stylet-in technique

This method consists of inserting the needle with the stylet-in, then only remove the stylet once the desired depth is achieved and CSF flow is expected. If no CSF comes back, the stylet is replaced before continuing to advance the needle until the subarachnoid space is entered. This is the technique generally used in our emergency department and will serve as the control treatment group.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Lumbar puncture using the stylet-out technique

This method consists of inserting the needle through the epidermis and the dermis, which is estimated as a 0.5 to 1 cm length in children, then remove the stylet before progressing through the other structures until the subarachnoid space is entered. This approach will be used in the experimental technique group.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Lumbar puncture using the early stylet removal technique

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients younger than 18 years of age (no minimal age)
* All patients who require a diagnostic lumbar puncture as part of their emergency department workup

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with lumbar puncture contraindications
* Parents/patients unable to give consent
* Patients who have had a traumatic of failed lumbar puncture prior to the emergency department transfer
Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

St. Justine's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ariane Boutin MD, MSc FRCPC

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU Sainte-Justine

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ariane Boutin, MD MSc FRCPC

Role: CONTACT

514-345-4931

Jocelyn Gravel, MD MSc FRCPC

Role: CONTACT

514-345-4931

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ariane Boutin, MD MSc FRCPC

Role: primary

514-345-4931

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Stylet in:out

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.