Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
395 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-09-21
2024-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the stylet-out technique can reduce the probability of failure or traumatic lumbar puncture procedures in a pediatric population presenting to the emergency department as compared to the standard stylet-in (SI) approach.
To achieve this goal, the investigator will conduct a randomized controlled trial comparing the SO versus SI techniques in a tertiary care, pediatric, university-affiliated emergency. All children younger than 18 years of age requiring a LP as part of their ED workup will be eligible and randomized to either the standard SI or SO group. The primary outcome will be the first-attempt LP success rate as defined by the minimum amount of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) necessary to perform a leukocyte count and bacterial/viral CSF cultures, according to each laboratory with red blood cell count \< 1000/mm3. Secondary outcomes will include the following: overall LP success rate (i.e. despite number of attempts), proportion of traumatic LP, number of LP attempts, number of changes in providers performing the LP, proportion of traumatic LP, total time to procedure, mean difference in pain scores and satisfaction rates in both groups.
The hypothesis is that the use of the Stylet Out approach will reduce the number of failed and traumatic LP in the pediatric population presenting to the ED as compared to the standard SI approach.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Impact of Child Positioning on Pain During a Lumbar Puncture
NCT02834156
Ultrasound-Assisted Lumbar Puncture in Children
NCT03099642
The Effect of Bedside Ultrasound Assistance on the Proportion of Successful Infant Spinal Taps
NCT02133066
Bedside Ultrasound Assisted Pediatric Lumbar Puncture
NCT02193763
Repeat Lumbar Puncture at 24 Versus 48 Hours After Traumatic Lumbar Puncture in Neonates
NCT04794881
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Stylet-in
Lumbar puncture performed keeping the stylet inside the needle until the practitioner reaches the appropriate location.
Lumbar puncture using the stylet-in technique
This method consists of inserting the needle with the stylet-in, then only remove the stylet once the desired depth is achieved and CSF flow is expected. If no CSF comes back, the stylet is replaced before continuing to advance the needle until the subarachnoid space is entered. This is the technique generally used in our emergency department and will serve as the control treatment group.
Stylet-out
The practitioner remove the stylet once he/she has passed the skin and moves the needle forward with the stylet.
Lumbar puncture using the stylet-out technique
This method consists of inserting the needle through the epidermis and the dermis, which is estimated as a 0.5 to 1 cm length in children, then remove the stylet before progressing through the other structures until the subarachnoid space is entered. This approach will be used in the experimental technique group.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lumbar puncture using the stylet-in technique
This method consists of inserting the needle with the stylet-in, then only remove the stylet once the desired depth is achieved and CSF flow is expected. If no CSF comes back, the stylet is replaced before continuing to advance the needle until the subarachnoid space is entered. This is the technique generally used in our emergency department and will serve as the control treatment group.
Lumbar puncture using the stylet-out technique
This method consists of inserting the needle through the epidermis and the dermis, which is estimated as a 0.5 to 1 cm length in children, then remove the stylet before progressing through the other structures until the subarachnoid space is entered. This approach will be used in the experimental technique group.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* All patients who require a diagnostic lumbar puncture as part of their emergency department workup
Exclusion Criteria
* Parents/patients unable to give consent
* Patients who have had a traumatic of failed lumbar puncture prior to the emergency department transfer
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
St. Justine's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ariane Boutin MD, MSc FRCPC
Principal investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU Sainte-Justine
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Stylet in:out
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.