Pediatric Lumbar Puncture Success Using the COMPASS

NCT ID: NCT01285531

Last Updated: 2011-02-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Objective: To evaluate pediatric emergency department provider lumbar puncture success with and without the Compass Lumbar Puncture Enhanced, a new pressure transducer, in order to determine: the proportion of lumbar punctures where a) any cerebrospinal fluid is obtained on the first attempt, b) any cerebrospinal fluid is obtained on any attempt, and c) sufficient cerebrospinal fluid is obtained for standard tests (culture, chemistries, cell count); the time to provider success in obtaining a) a drop of fluid from the needle, and b) opening pressure measurement; the proportion of successful lumbar punctures that contain blood; and provider satisfaction.

Background: Lumbar punctures are necessary to diagnose meningitis, neurological diseases and some cancers. They are common pediatric emergency department procedures that frequently require repeated attempts or are only partially successful, with sufficient blood to limit interpretation. Measuring cerebrospinal fluid pressure during lumbar punctures is recommended but rarely done, due to limitations of current technology. Liquid column manometry is cumbersome, time-consuming and frequently impractical. Existing pressure transduction probes that connect via tubing to external monitors are not designed or recommended for lumbar punctures. The pressure is displayed on a monitor that is difficult to view during the LP procedure and they equilibrate too slowly to keep pace of pressure changes during LPs. The Compass Lumbar Puncture Enhanced is a new, inexpensive, disposable, medical device, specifically designed for use during LPs, that has the potential to increase lumbar punctures success and decrease blood contamination. It attaches to the spinal needle and displays both a numeric pressure value and a pressure waveform, allowing physicians to more readily identify the cerebrospinal fluid space and measure cerebrospinal fluid pressure. The device is small, easy to use, and readily incorporated into standard practice.

The Compass Lumbar Puncture Enhanced uniquely provides immediate feedback about pressure that may allow physicians to more quickly and confidently identify the CSF space, and instantly determine cerebrospinal fluid pressure when the space is reached. The investigators believe the Compass Lumbar Puncture Enhanced will increase lumbar punctures success and decrease the proportion containing blood. It has the potential to become the standard of care and be used in every lumbar puncture procedure. This study is expected to demonstrate the clinical utility of the Compass Lumbar Puncture Enhanced to the medical community. Increased awareness of the Compass Lumbar Puncture Enhanced and a positive demonstration of the viability of the technology will help attract either the investment capital or the strategic partnership necessary to fully develop the market.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Objective: To evaluate pediatric emergency department (ED) provider lumbar puncture success with and without the Compass Lumbar Puncture Enhanced, a new pressure transducer, in order to determine: the proportion of lumbar punctures (LPs) where a) any cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is obtained on the first attempt, b) any CSF is obtained on any attempt, and c) sufficient CSF is obtained for standard tests (culture, chemistries, cell count); the time to provider success in obtaining a) a drop of fluid from the needle, and b) opening pressure measurement; the proportion of successful lumbar punctures that contain blood; and provider satisfaction.

Background: Lumbar punctures are necessary to diagnose meningitis, neurological diseases and some cancers. They are common pediatric emergency department procedures that frequently require repeated attempts or are only partially successful, with sufficient blood to limit interpretation. Measuring cerebrospinal fluid pressure during a lumbar puncture is recommended but rarely done, due to limitations of current technology. Liquid column manometry is cumbersome, time-consuming and frequently impractical. Existing pressure transduction probes that connect via tubing to external monitors are not designed or recommended for LPs. The pressure is displayed on a monitor that is difficult to view during the lumbar puncture procedure and they equilibrate too slowly to keep pace of pressure changes during lumbar puncture. The Compass Lumbar Puncture Enhanced is a new, inexpensive, disposable, medical device, specifically designed for use during lumbar punctures, that has the potential to increase lumbar puncture success and decrease blood contamination. It attaches to the spinal needle and displays both a numeric pressure value and a pressure waveform, allowing physicians to more readily identify the cerebrospinal fluid space and measure cerebrospinal fluid pressure. The device is small, easy to use, and readily incorporated into standard practice.

Methods: This randomized clinical trial will test adding the Compass Lumbar Puncture Enhanced vs. standard care in 60 children 0-16 years old who are receiving a lumbar puncture in the Seattle Children's Hospital Emergency Department. We will test the Compass Lumbar Puncture Enhanced against standard care in 60 children receiving lumbar puncture, comparing success, pressures obtaining, time to success, complications (e.g. \>200 red blood cells/mm3) and provider satisfaction. Results will be compared with chi-squared tests, regressions, Kaplan-Meier and logrank tests. We expect improved success, decreased time to success and complications and high provider satisfaction.

Impact: Currently, one third of lumbar punctures require multiple attempts, 7-20% contain blood that limits interpretation, and 6% are unsuccessful. This results in unnecessary hospitalizations, increased hospital days, increased antibiotic use and increased numbers of repeat procedures. The Compass Lumbar Puncture Enhanced uniquely provides immediate feedback about pressure that will allow physicians to more quickly and confidently identify the cerebrospinal fluid space, and instantly determine cerebrospinal fluid pressure when the space is reached. We believe the Compass Lumbar Puncture Enhanced will increase lumbar puncture success and decrease the proportion containing blood. It has the potential to become the standard of care and be used in every lumbar puncture procedure. This study is expected to demonstrate the clinical utility of the Compass Lumbar Puncture Enhanced to the medical community.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lumbar Puncture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lumbar puncture

The participants randomly assigned to this arm will receive a lumbar puncture using standard procedures and equipment

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Lumbar puncture with the Compass device

The participants randomly assigned to this group will receive a lumbar puncture with the use of the Compass device.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Compass Lumbar Puncture Enhanced

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants randomly assigned to this group will receive a lumbar puncture using the Compass device.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Compass Lumbar Puncture Enhanced

Participants randomly assigned to this group will receive a lumbar puncture using the Compass device.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

compass

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 0 - 18 years old
* Patient was in the Seattle Children's Hospital (SCH) Emergency Department (ED)within 24 hours
* Patient requires lumbar puncture (can be performed in the ED or inpatient, within 24 hours of arrival to the ED)
* Parent is able to read English or Spanish
* A provider who is trained in the use of the Compass device is willing and able to use it during the LP

Exclusion Criteria

* Child is a foster child or ward of the state or is unaccompanied by their legal guardian
* Child has a lower spine deformity, such as spina bifida, that would impact lP success
* The child is pregnant, by verbal report or clinically available test results
Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Life Sciences Development Fund

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Seattle Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Seattle Children's Hospital

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

JUlie C. Brown, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Seattle Children's Hospital, Pediatric Emergency Department

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Seattle Children's Hospital

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Julie C Brown, MD, MPH

Role: CONTACT

206-987-4016

Daniel P. Osincup, BA

Role: CONTACT

206-987-2939

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Julie C. Brown, MD, MPH

Role: primary

206-987-4016

Daniel P. Osincup, BA

Role: backup

206-987-2939

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

COMPASS13373

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.