Pediatric Blunt Abdominal Trauma Clinical Prediction Model
NCT ID: NCT02206698
Last Updated: 2018-05-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
2800 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-07-31
2016-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound for Evaluation of Pediatric Abdominal Trauma
NCT01763840
CEUS for Blunt Abdominal Trauma in Children
NCT03490929
Effectiveness of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
NCT03473249
Whole-Body MRI in Suspected Victims of Abusive Head Trauma
NCT02309216
Prospective Evaluation of Blunt Renal Injury in Children
NCT00855036
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary Outcome Variables: 1) Intra-abdominal injury (IAI) (presence of solid or hollow organ injury (spleen, liver, kidney, GI tract, adrenal, pancreas, intra-abdominal vascular structure, bladder, ureter, gallbladder, abdominal wall fascia)) 2) IAI requiring intervention (abdominal operation, angio-embolization, blood transfusion)
Time Course: The initial data collection period will extend for one year. Data will be recorded in a password protected redcap database which is readily available online to all participating institutions.
Study setting: Eleven Level One Pediatric Trauma Centers
Data collection points: demographics (age, mechanism, alert level), physical exam, labs (AST, HCT, amylase, UA, base deficit), FAST, imaging results, injuries, outcomes (admission, ICU admit, need for intervention, missed injuries, ISS).
Data Analysis: De-identified data will be used during the data analysis phase to minimize the risk of loss of confidentiality to the patients. Data analysis with development of a clinical prediction rule (CPM) will be performed as follows. A logistic regression will be used to fit a predictive model for both IAI and IAI requiring interventions. SAS 9.3 will be used for the statistical analysis. Validation (including sensitivity and negative predictive value) of the derived CPM would then be performed in a subsequent study using a second population of patients. Internal validation of the prediction model was assessed by creating a split sample using a random selection process; half of the sample was used as the initial cohort to develop the prediction model for estimates of all covariates, and the remaining half was used as the validation cohort to compare the true to the predicted outcomes. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is created by plotting sensitivity against (1- specificity) for different cut-off points of the predicted outcome. A bootstrap study of 1000 replications was performed on the level of sensitivity, specificity and TP/FP/FN/TN validation. Validation (including sensitivity and negative predictive value) of the derived CPM would then be performed in a subsequent study using a second population of patients.
Quality assurance plan: Data quality will be evaluated bi-monthly by a team consisting of the PI, an expert in clinical prediction models and a statistician. This panel will be able to review de-identified data from all institutions but will not have access to make any changes in the data entered in the centralized database.
Data checks to compare data entered into the registry against predefined rules for range or consistency: Data checks to compare entered registry data against predefined rules for range and consistency will be performed bi-monthly.
Source data verification: Source data collection is the responsibility of each individual institution. A data analysis team consisting of a statistician and an expert in clinical prediction models will evaluate the data bi-monthly to look for wide outliers (beyond pre-defined range) and impossible data values (not clinically possible) and request clarification from the individual institutions when necessary.
Data dictionary that contains detailed descriptions of each variable: The vast majority of the data collection points are discrete variables with no opportunity for "free text" data entry. Many of these variables are specifically described on the data collection tools. Data definitions and question from the individual sites are addressed in a frequently updated Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) document which is sent out to the sites bi-monthly following data verification review.
Standard Operating Procedures to address registry operations and analysis activities: The database is established through a secure Vanderbilt Redcap web-based site. Individual site data collection will be analyzed and reviewed bi-monthly with feedback to each of the sites if data inconsistencies exist.
Plan for missing data to address situations where variables are reported as missing, unavailable, "non-reported," cannot be interpreted, or considered missing because of data inconsistency or out-of-range results: Critical data which are missing, unavailable or not reported will not be utilized for the development of the blunt abdominal trauma clinical prediction model (BAT CPM). The investigators will attempt clarification for out of range results prior to data analysis. Variables which are available and reported in less than 50% of the patients will likely be excluded from the CPM because they will not form the basis of a practicable risk stratification model. The developed CPM will require validation in a second un-related population prior to widespread application of the CPM.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* \<16 years of age
* The need to activate the trauma system is dictated by the Emergency Department physician
* Consults called to the department of surgery for suspicion of intraabdominal traumatic injury
Exclusion Criteria
* Burn injury
* Hanging
* Drowning
* Penetrating injury
* CT A/P performed prior to arrival
* Presentation \>6 hours from time of injury
* Pregnancy
* Isolated head injury
* Fall \<10 feet with no concern for intraabdominal injury
* Isolated extremity injury
15 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt
OTHER
University of Arkansas
OTHER
University of Alabama at Birmingham
OTHER
Virginia Commonwealth University
OTHER
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
OTHER
University of Tennessee
OTHER
Memorial Hermann Hospital
OTHER
Baylor College of Medicine
OTHER
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
OTHER
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
OTHER
Washington University School of Medicine
OTHER
Boston Children's Hospital
OTHER
Emory University
OTHER
Medical University of South Carolina
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Christian J Streck, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical University of South Carolina
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Children's Hospital of Alabama
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Arkansas Children's Hospital
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
LA Children's
Los Angeles, California, United States
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Boston Children's
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Children's Mercy Hospital
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Washington University
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Cincinnati Children's Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Texas Children's Hospital
Houston, Texas, United States
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Houston, Texas, United States
Children's Hospital of Richmond
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Frederick AB, Vogel AM, Williams RF, Zhang J, Huang EY, Savoie KB, Santore MT, Tsao K, Falcone RA, Dassinger MS, Haynes JH, Russell RT, Naik-Mathuria BJ, St Peter SD, Mooney DP, Onwubiko C, Blakely ML, Streck CJ. Multicenter external validation of the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network rule to identify children at very low risk for intra-abdominal injury requiring acute intervention. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2025 Jun 1;98(6):966-972. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004597. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00030071
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.