Confirming Proper Replacement of Dislodged Gastrostomy Tubes in Pediatric Patients

NCT ID: NCT04331873

Last Updated: 2023-10-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-08-01

Study Completion Date

2021-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate if ultrasound can be used effectively to confirm location of gastrostomy tube (G-tube) placement in place of a study in which contrast is flushed through the G-tube and placement is checked with X-ray. A G-tube is a tube inserted through the abdomen and delivers nutrition directly into the stomach.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of this study is to determine if ultrasound is a safe and reliable way to confirm the proper placement of a dislodged gastrostomy tube in a pediatric emergency department.

In the case of emergent replacement of dislodged gastrostomy tubes, the emergency department currently obtains a contrast injection of the gastrostomy tube to confirm proper replacement in patients who recently had gastrostomy surgically placed or those who require dilation/have difficult replacement as per the pediatric surgery protocol. In this study, an ultrasound (US) will be obtained by an US technician to assess if the gastrostomy tube is in the proper location. Once this study has been obtained, the patient will undergo the typical contrast injection of the gastrostomy tube to confirm placement. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound to the current gold standard of contrast injection will be compared.

Ultrasound (US) has the benefit of having no radiation exposure for the patient. In patients anticipated to have multiple emergency department visits a year for gastrostomy complications, using ultrasound as opposed to contrast injection may make a significant impact on accumulated radiation exposure.

The patient population will be composed of children ages 0 to 21 years that visit Le Bonheur Children's Hospital Emergency Department (Memphis, TN) for replacement of a dislodge gastrostomy tube who require contrast injection to confirm proper replacement. Once it is determined that imaging is needed to confirm replacement, the patient and legally authorized representative (LAR) will be consented for the study. The determination for contrast injection is made per protocol when gastrostomy was placed within the last 3 months or when a difficult replacement occurs (i.e. one requiring stoma dilation). A procedure checklist will be used for the provider to complete for the procedure that can be used to better evaluate the amount of attempts made to replace the tube and different methods used prior to decision to pursue contrast injection.

The LAR's will be consented for the study once they are in their private exam room in the ER. Consent, and assent when applicable, will be obtained for the study as well as discussion of risks of improper gastrostomy placement and it's risk of infection. However, this will not be deviating from the current standard of care for emergent gastrostomy replacement.

When patient goes to the radiology department, they will have an US performed by US technician who will inject Pedialyte solution through the gastrostomy and visualize fluid entering the stomach in sagittal and transverse views. These ultrasound images will not have any effect on the patient's ER course in real time and will be read by the attending radiologist the following day. Furthermore, the risk of Pedialyte injection into an improperly placed gastrostomy tube has already been discussed with pediatric surgery and radiology and is determined to be of no risk of harm to the patient as any misplaced tube would require confirmation with contrast injection at this point in time. The patient will then have contrast injection performed as per the standard of care to confirm placement and then will return to their ER exam room for further management during their visit based on the results of their contrast injection study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gastrostomy Tube Site Complication Gastrostomy Complications

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ultrasound

An ultrasound will be obtained to evaluate placement of the gastrostomy tube prior to obtaining the standard contrast injection

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ultrasound

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

An ultrasound will be obtained prior to obtaining the standard contrast injection to determine if this imaging modality is equivocal.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ultrasound

An ultrasound will be obtained prior to obtaining the standard contrast injection to determine if this imaging modality is equivocal.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

US

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Dislodged gastrostomy tube requiring contrast injection to confirm proper gastrostomy replacement

Exclusion Criteria

* No ultrasound technician present in hospital
* Non-functioning ultrasound equipment (e.g. due to hardware issues)
Minimum Eligible Age

0 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Le Bonheur Children's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Tennessee

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Cailin Frank, DO

Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellow

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rudy A Kink, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Le Bonheur Children's Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

LeBonheur Children's Hospital

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dookhoo L, Mahant S, Parra DA, John PR, Amaral JG, Connolly BL. Peritonitis following percutaneous gastrostomy tube insertions in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2016 Sep;46(10):1444-50. doi: 10.1007/s00247-016-3628-5. Epub 2016 May 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27173980 (View on PubMed)

Myatt TC, Medak AJ, Lam SHF. Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound to Guide Pediatric Gastrostomy Tube Replacement in the Emergency Department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018 Feb;34(2):145-148. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001400.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29346232 (View on PubMed)

Saavedra H, Losek JD, Shanley L, Titus MO. Gastrostomy tube-related complaints in the pediatric emergency department: identifying opportunities for improvement. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009 Nov;25(11):728-32. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181bec847.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19864965 (View on PubMed)

Showalter CD, Kerrey B, Spellman-Kennebeck S, Timm N. Gastrostomy tube replacement in a pediatric ED: frequency of complications and impact of confirmatory imaging. Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Oct;30(8):1501-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.12.014. Epub 2012 Feb 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22306396 (View on PubMed)

Tsujimoto H, Tsujimoto Y, Nakata Y, Akazawa M, Kataoka Y. Ultrasonography for confirmation of gastric tube placement. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 17;4(4):CD012083. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012083.pub2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28414415 (View on PubMed)

Wu TS, Leech SJ, Rosenberg M, Huggins C, Papa L. Ultrasound can accurately guide gastrostomy tube replacement and confirm proper tube placement at the bedside. J Emerg Med. 2009 Apr;36(3):280-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.11.064. Epub 2008 Jul 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18614327 (View on PubMed)

Zamora IJ, Fallon SC, Orth RC, Kim ME, Brandt ML, Lopez ME, Wesson DE, Rodriguez JR. Overuse of fluoroscopic gastrostomy studies in a children's hospital. J Surg Res. 2014 Aug;190(2):598-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.05.010. Epub 2014 May 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24909868 (View on PubMed)

Berman L, Hronek C, Raval MV, Browne ML, Snyder CL, Heiss KF, Rangel SJ, Goldin AB, Rothstein DH. Pediatric Gastrostomy Tube Placement: Lessons Learned from High-performing Institutions through Structured Interviews. Pediatr Qual Saf. 2017 Feb 23;2(2):e016. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000016. eCollection 2017 Mar-Apr.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30229155 (View on PubMed)

Bhambani S, Phan TH, Brown L, Thorp AW. Replacement of Dislodged Gastrostomy Tubes After Stoma Dilation in the Pediatric Emergency Department. West J Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;18(4):770-774. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.3.31796. Epub 2017 Apr 19.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28611900 (View on PubMed)

Church JT, Speck KE, Jarboe MD. Ultrasound-guided gastrostomy tube placement: A case series. J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Jul;52(7):1210-1214. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.03.061. Epub 2017 Apr 2.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28408076 (View on PubMed)

Chenaitia H, Brun PM, Querellou E, Leyral J, Bessereau J, Aime C, Bouaziz R, Georges A, Louis F; WINFOCUS (World Interactive Network Focused On Critical Ultrasound) Group France. Ultrasound to confirm gastric tube placement in prehospital management. Resuscitation. 2012 Apr;83(4):447-51. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.11.035. Epub 2011 Dec 29.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22209831 (View on PubMed)

Correa JA, Fallon SC, Murphy KM, Victorian VA, Bisset GS, Vasudevan SA, Lopez ME, Brandt ML, Cass DL, Rodriguez JR, Wesson DE, Lee TC. Resource utilization after gastrostomy tube placement: defining areas of improvement for future quality improvement projects. J Pediatr Surg. 2014 Nov;49(11):1598-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.06.015. Epub 2014 Aug 8.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25475801 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

19-06455-XP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.