Comparison of Infant Pain Responses Between Two Different Methods of Urine Collection
NCT ID: NCT00298584
Last Updated: 2007-02-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Urine Samples Obtained by Bladder Stimulation for the Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infection in Infants
NCT03801213
Quick-Wee Versus Bladder Stimulation System to Collect Midstream Urine From Pre-continent Infants
NCT04587999
The Painful Real-life Experience of the Child of Less Than Three Years During the Removal of the Collecting Bags in the Pediatric Urgency: What Strategy of Coverage?
NCT01659190
Use of Ultrasound Guidance to Facilitate Obtaining Peripheral Intravenous Access
NCT04877301
Applicability of Uroflowmetry in Children with Cerebral Palsy
NCT05017415
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
DOUBLE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Percutaneous Suprapubic Aspiration
Urethral Catheterization
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Neurological conditions
* Congenital anomalies associated with the central nervous system, gut, or genitourinary tract
* Abdominal distension or abdominal infection/cellulitis
* Colostomy
* Inguinal hernia
* Organomegaly
* Bleeding diatheses (thrombocytopenia or coagulopathy)
* Receiving analgesics or sedatives
1 Day
6 Months
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Hospital for Sick Children
OTHER
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Anna Taddio, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto Canada
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mount Sinai Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
The Hospital for Sick Children
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
El-Naggar W, Yiu A, Mohamed A, Shah V, Manley J, McNamara P, Taddio A. Comparison of pain during two methods of urine collection in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2010 Jun;125(6):1224-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-3284. Epub 2010 May 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1000008396
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.