Comparison of Infant Pain Responses Between Two Different Methods of Urine Collection

NCT ID: NCT00298584

Last Updated: 2007-02-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine which of the two procedures commonly used to collect urine, percutaneous suprapubic aspiration (SPA) and urethral catheterization (UC), is less painful, and the success rates and complication rates associated with both methods.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Infants hospitalized in the NICU undergo numerous invasive and painful procedures. Exposure to early repeated painful procedures has been correlated with both short-term and long-term negative sequelae, such as altered pain responses and increased sensitivity to pain (Taddio 2005). Fifty eligible infants in the NICU will be randomized to undergo urine collection by either suprapubic aspiration (SPA) or urinary catheterization (UC). Outcome measures will include pain, procedure success, and procedure duration. Pain will be measured using facial grimacing (the infant's face will be videotaped for the entire procedure), heart rate and oxygen saturation. Procedure success will be defined by the collection of about 2mL of urine (Falcao, 1999). The procedure duration in seconds for the first attempt will be calculated. Infants will be monitored during the procedure for adverse events such as apnea, bradycardia, desaturation, emesis, increased ventilatory support. Results will be extremely valuable in aiding health care providers to choose a urine collection technique that minimizes the pain and maximizes the success of the procedure.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Intensive Care, Neonatal

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Percutaneous Suprapubic Aspiration

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Urethral Catheterization

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) who require urine samples for microbiological analysis

Exclusion Criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of birth asphyxia or seizures
* Neurological conditions
* Congenital anomalies associated with the central nervous system, gut, or genitourinary tract
* Abdominal distension or abdominal infection/cellulitis
* Colostomy
* Inguinal hernia
* Organomegaly
* Bleeding diatheses (thrombocytopenia or coagulopathy)
* Receiving analgesics or sedatives
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Day

Maximum Eligible Age

6 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Hospital for Sick Children

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Anna Taddio, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto Canada

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mount Sinai Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

The Hospital for Sick Children

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Anna Taddio, PhD

Role: CONTACT

416-813-6235

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Vibhuti Shah, MD

Role: primary

416-586-4800 ext. 4816

Anna Taddio, PhD

Role: primary

416-813-6235

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

El-Naggar W, Yiu A, Mohamed A, Shah V, Manley J, McNamara P, Taddio A. Comparison of pain during two methods of urine collection in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2010 Jun;125(6):1224-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-3284. Epub 2010 May 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 20478939 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1000008396

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Antiseptic-coated Intermittent Urinary Catheter
NCT02697162 WITHDRAWN PHASE2/PHASE3