Single vs. Double Tenting Screws for Horizontal Ridge Augmentation.
NCT ID: NCT07060027
Last Updated: 2025-07-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
16 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-08-01
2024-12-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* Does using two screws give better bone growth than using one screw?
* Which technique creates more stable bone for dental implants?
Researchers will compare the single-screw technique to the double-screw technique to see which works better for jawbone reconstruction.
Participants will:
* Receive either one or two small titanium screws placed in their jawbone to support a bone graft
* Have the graft covered with a protective membrane
* Return after 6 months for screw removal and dental implant placement
* Attend follow-up visits to check healing progress
The study will help dentists determine the best method for patients who need jawbone reconstruction before getting dental implants. All procedures use FDA-approved materials and follow standard surgical protocols.
New chat
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparative Evaluation Between One-piece and Two-piece Implants Supporting Mandibular Screw-retained All-On-Four Full-arch Prosthesis on Peri-implant Bone Changes.
NCT06790524
Dental Implant Stability Placed in Healed Bony Sites Using Oversized Drilling Versus Conventional Drilling Protocol
NCT06917638
Laser Treated vs SLA Treated Short Implants in Terms of Stability.
NCT04100382
Implant Phenotype Modification Via GBR and ADM
NCT07082244
Accuracy of Trephination-based Versus Drilling-based Guided Dental Implant Placement
NCT05295082
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Single tenting screw
8 patients indicated for lateral ridge augmentation in premolar-molar area (class I Seibert's classification) will be candidates to screw tent technique using single screw at crest position
horizontal bone augmentation using single tenting screw
Patients in this group will undergo guided bone regeneration (GBR) using a single titanium bone screw placed in the crestal position to stabilize the graft material. The surgical procedure includes sulcular and vertical releasing incisions, elevation of full-thickness buccal and palatal/lingual flaps, and multiple cortical perforations to enhance angiogenesis. The defect will be filled with particulate allograft extended 10-12 mm apicocoronally and covered with a bovine pericardium membrane. A tension-free primary closure will be achieved using 5-0 polypropylene sutures. Bone screw removal and implant placement will occur 6 months postoperatively. This group is distinguished by the use of a single crestal screw for graft stabilization compared to dual-screw fixation in the control group.
Double tenting screw
8 patients indicated for lateral ridge augmentation in premolar-molar area (class I Seibert's classification) will be candidates to screw tent technique using double screws, one at a crestal position and the other one 5 mm apical to the first one.
horizontal bone augmentation using Double tenting screw
Participants in this group will receive guided bone regeneration (GBR) with two titanium bone screws for enhanced graft stabilization. One screw will be placed at the crestal level, while a second screw will be inserted 5 mm apical to the first, providing vertical stabilization of the graft material. The procedure involves sulcular and vertical releasing incisions, full-thickness flap elevation on both buccal and palatal/lingual aspects, and multiple cortical perforations to stimulate vascularization. The defect will be filled with particulate allograft extending 10-12 mm apicocoronally and covered with a bovine pericardium membrane. Tension-free primary closure will be performed using 5-0 polypropylene sutures. At 6 months, screws will be removed and dental implants placed. This intervention is distinguished by the dual-screw fixation technique, designed to provide greater mechanical stability compared to the single-screw approach used in the comparator group.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
horizontal bone augmentation using single tenting screw
Patients in this group will undergo guided bone regeneration (GBR) using a single titanium bone screw placed in the crestal position to stabilize the graft material. The surgical procedure includes sulcular and vertical releasing incisions, elevation of full-thickness buccal and palatal/lingual flaps, and multiple cortical perforations to enhance angiogenesis. The defect will be filled with particulate allograft extended 10-12 mm apicocoronally and covered with a bovine pericardium membrane. A tension-free primary closure will be achieved using 5-0 polypropylene sutures. Bone screw removal and implant placement will occur 6 months postoperatively. This group is distinguished by the use of a single crestal screw for graft stabilization compared to dual-screw fixation in the control group.
horizontal bone augmentation using Double tenting screw
Participants in this group will receive guided bone regeneration (GBR) with two titanium bone screws for enhanced graft stabilization. One screw will be placed at the crestal level, while a second screw will be inserted 5 mm apical to the first, providing vertical stabilization of the graft material. The procedure involves sulcular and vertical releasing incisions, full-thickness flap elevation on both buccal and palatal/lingual aspects, and multiple cortical perforations to stimulate vascularization. The defect will be filled with particulate allograft extending 10-12 mm apicocoronally and covered with a bovine pericardium membrane. Tension-free primary closure will be performed using 5-0 polypropylene sutures. At 6 months, screws will be removed and dental implants placed. This intervention is distinguished by the dual-screw fixation technique, designed to provide greater mechanical stability compared to the single-screw approach used in the comparator group.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Gingival health according to the new classification system (Caton, J. G. et al., 2018).
* The recipient site of the augmentation is free from any pathological conditions.
* At least 1 tooth area with a ridge defect and planned to receive a dental implant. The site must be bordered by at least 1 tooth.
* Class I ridge defect according to Seibert's classification.
* Adequate interocclusal space to accommodate the available restorative components.
Exclusion Criteria
* Smokers
* Pregnant females
20 Years
55 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Omar Saad
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Omar Saad
Principal Investigator - Teaching Assistant of Periodontology, Faculty of dentistry, Minia university
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
hospital of faculty of dentistry, Minia university
Minya, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
4/626/88/2022
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.