Comparison of the Effectiveness of Chiropractic Manipulation Applied to the Lumbar Sacroiliac Region in Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation
NCT ID: NCT07037641
Last Updated: 2025-09-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
45 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-06-20
2025-08-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing the Effect of Chiropractic Manipulation and Spinal Decompression Device Treatment
NCT05460286
The Effect of Lumbar and Sacroiliac Manipulation on Football Players
NCT06568666
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Spinal Stabilization Exercises and Chiropractic Spinal Manipulation
NCT04830098
Comparison of the Immediate Effects of Manual Therapy Techniques in Non-Specific Neck Pain
NCT06959160
Effectiveness of Chiropractic Cervical Manipulation in Lateral Epicondylitis
NCT06300749
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The Control Group (CG) receives only the standard physiotherapy program. The Lumbar Group (LG) receives standard physiotherapy in combination with lumbar spinal manipulation.
The Sacroiliac Group (SIG) receives standard physiotherapy in combination with sacroiliac joint manipulation.
Interventions are delivered by licensed practitioners following standardized protocols. The study aims to evaluate the effects of region-specific chiropractic manipulations on pain intensity, functional disability, kinesiophobia, and lumbar range of motion. Assessments are conducted at baseline and at the end of the treatment period using validated measurement tools: the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, and goniometric range of motion measurements.
By comparing outcomes across these three groups, the study seeks to identify whether regionally targeted chiropractic manipulation enhances the clinical efficacy of conventional physiotherapy in managing lumbar disc herniation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lumbar Region Group (LBG)
Participants in the lumbar manipulation group will receive the same conventional physiotherapy program as the control group (hot pack, TENS, ultrasound, and exercise therapy), along with high-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA) chiropractic manipulation applied specifically to the lumbar spine. The lumbar manipulation will be administered twice per week, totaling four sessions over a two-week period.
Lumbar Spine Manipulation
Painful lumbar segments will be identified through palpation of the spinous and transverse processes. Patients will be positioned side-lying with head supported by a pillow. The lower arm will rest across the chest, and the lower leg will be extended while the upper leg will be flexed, with the foot placed in the popliteal space. The practitioner will assume a 45-degree angled stance, stabilizing the patient's pelvis between their thighs. The hypothenar eminence will contact the mammillary process of the dysfunctional vertebra, while the opposite hand stabilizes the upper shoulder. A high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) thrust will be applied in a rotational direction toward the patient's umbilicus. This technique will be performed twice per week for two weeks (4 sessions total), alongside conventional physiotherapy (hot pack, TENS, ultrasound, and exercise).
Sacroiliac Joint Manipulation Group (SEG)
Participants in the sacroiliac joint manipulation group will receive the standard physiotherapy protocol (hot pack, TENS, ultrasound, and exercise therapy) in combination with high-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA) chiropractic manipulation targeted at the sacroiliac (SI) joint. The SI joint manipulation will be performed twice weekly, for a total of four sessions over two weeks.
Sacroiliac Joint Manipulation
The side for sacroiliac joint manipulation will be determined using the Derifield leg length test. Based on functional leg length differences, a PI (posterior-inferior) ilium will be identified. Patients will be positioned side-lying with appropriate limb and trunk alignment. The practitioner's hypothenar eminence will be placed on the PSIS of the dysfunctional side. A high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) thrust will be applied in a rotational direction from the PSIS toward the patient's umbilicus to correct the joint dysfunction. The manipulation will be performed twice a week over two weeks (4 sessions in total), combined with conventional physiotherapy (hot pack, TENS, ultrasound, and exercise).
Control Group (CG)
Participants in the control group will receive conventional physiotherapy consisting of hot pack application, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), therapeutic ultrasound, and supervised exercise therapy. These treatments will be applied regularly over a two-week period. No chiropractic or manual therapy will be administered in this group.
Conventional Physiotherapy
Conventional physiotherapy will consist of hot pack, TENS, therapeutic ultrasound, and supervised exercises applied over two weeks (6 sessions/week). Hot packs filled with silicate gel will be wrapped in four towel layers and applied for 20 minutes with the patient prone and a pillow under the abdomen. TENS will be delivered via Chattanooga Intelect device with a symmetrical biphasic program for 30 minutes using four electrodes placed on the treatment area. Ultrasound will be applied continuously for 3 minutes with the same device. Patients will be instructed on lumbar mobility and strengthening exercises, performed twice daily with 15 repetitions each. No spinal or sacroiliac manipulation will be performed in this group.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lumbar Spine Manipulation
Painful lumbar segments will be identified through palpation of the spinous and transverse processes. Patients will be positioned side-lying with head supported by a pillow. The lower arm will rest across the chest, and the lower leg will be extended while the upper leg will be flexed, with the foot placed in the popliteal space. The practitioner will assume a 45-degree angled stance, stabilizing the patient's pelvis between their thighs. The hypothenar eminence will contact the mammillary process of the dysfunctional vertebra, while the opposite hand stabilizes the upper shoulder. A high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) thrust will be applied in a rotational direction toward the patient's umbilicus. This technique will be performed twice per week for two weeks (4 sessions total), alongside conventional physiotherapy (hot pack, TENS, ultrasound, and exercise).
Sacroiliac Joint Manipulation
The side for sacroiliac joint manipulation will be determined using the Derifield leg length test. Based on functional leg length differences, a PI (posterior-inferior) ilium will be identified. Patients will be positioned side-lying with appropriate limb and trunk alignment. The practitioner's hypothenar eminence will be placed on the PSIS of the dysfunctional side. A high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) thrust will be applied in a rotational direction from the PSIS toward the patient's umbilicus to correct the joint dysfunction. The manipulation will be performed twice a week over two weeks (4 sessions in total), combined with conventional physiotherapy (hot pack, TENS, ultrasound, and exercise).
Conventional Physiotherapy
Conventional physiotherapy will consist of hot pack, TENS, therapeutic ultrasound, and supervised exercises applied over two weeks (6 sessions/week). Hot packs filled with silicate gel will be wrapped in four towel layers and applied for 20 minutes with the patient prone and a pillow under the abdomen. TENS will be delivered via Chattanooga Intelect device with a symmetrical biphasic program for 30 minutes using four electrodes placed on the treatment area. Ultrasound will be applied continuously for 3 minutes with the same device. Patients will be instructed on lumbar mobility and strengthening exercises, performed twice daily with 15 repetitions each. No spinal or sacroiliac manipulation will be performed in this group.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Have been diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation
* Have signed the voluntary consent form
Exclusion Criteria
* Having a contraindication to chiropractic manipulation
* Having a rheumatic disease
* Having undergone surgery in the lumbar and sacroiliac regions
* Being pregnant or suspected of being pregnant
* Having a malignant disease
* Having severe physical and psychological disorders
* Having acute fractures of the spine and lower extremities fractures in the lower extremities
* Individuals with neurological and orthopedic deficits in the lower extremities
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
SEFA HAKTAN HATIK
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
SEFA HAKTAN HATIK
Asst. Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
SEFA H HATIK, Asst. Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sinop University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sinop University
Sinop, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CMT0008
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.