Spinal Manipulation and Dry Needling Versus Conventional Physical Therapy in Patients With Sacroiliac Dysfunction

NCT ID: NCT02373644

Last Updated: 2020-02-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

116 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-02-21

Study Completion Date

2020-01-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the research project is to compare the effectiveness of non-thrust mobilization and exercise versus thrust manipulation and dry needling in patients with sacroiliac dysfunction. Physical therapists commonly use both approaches to treat sacroiliac joint dysfunction, and this study is attempting to determine if one approach is more effective than the other.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients with sacroiliac pain will be randomized to receive 1-2 treatments per week for 6 weeks (up to 10 sessions total) of either: 1. High-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) thrust manipulation and dry needling group, or 2. conventional physical therapy (Stabilization, force closure, motor control exercises and manual therapy) group.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

HVLA Thrust Manipulation and DN

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

HVLA Thrust Manipulation and DN

Intervention Type OTHER

HVLA thrust manipulation targeting primarily the lumbar articulations and sacroiliac joint. Up to 10 sessions over 6 weeks. At least one session of dry needling to the lumbo-pelvic muscles and peri-articular ligaments of the SI joint.

Conventional Physical Therapy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional Physical Therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Therapeutic exercise and manual therapy, up to 10 sessions over 6 weeks. Patients may receive interferential current and moist heat.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

HVLA Thrust Manipulation and DN

HVLA thrust manipulation targeting primarily the lumbar articulations and sacroiliac joint. Up to 10 sessions over 6 weeks. At least one session of dry needling to the lumbo-pelvic muscles and peri-articular ligaments of the SI joint.

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional Physical Therapy

Therapeutic exercise and manual therapy, up to 10 sessions over 6 weeks. Patients may receive interferential current and moist heat.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient must report sacroiliac dysfunction, defined as:

* Pain of any duration (acute, subacute, or chronic) in the Fortin region (the pain may also project to the groin, thigh, lower leg and/or foot; however, it may only be local Fortin region pain in some subjects).
* Pain does NOT centralize with repeated movements or sustained postures
* A minimum of 3 positive pain provocation tests using either the Laslett et al. (2003, 2005) or van der Wurff et al (2006) multi-test regiments:
* 3 or more of the following 6 pain provocation tests (Laslett et al, 2003, 2005):
* Posterior thigh thrust
* Gaenslen's test (right)
* Gaenslen's test (left)
* ASIS distraction
* ASIS compression
* Sacral compression
2. A minimum pain rating of 2/10 using the NPRS (Numeric Pain Rating Scale 0---10)
3. A minimum ODI score of 10/50 (i.e. 20% minimum on Oswestry Disability Index)

Exclusion Criteria

1. Cauda Equina Syndrome
2. Neurologic presentation consistent with upper or lower motor neuron dysfunction due to spinal involvement (ie myelopathy or nerve compression, hyperreflexia, pathologic reflexes, depressed or absent reflexes in the lower extremities, motor weakness involving major muscle groups of lower extremity, unsteady gait, diminished or absent pin prick sensation in the legs and/or feet)
3. Spinal fractures
4. Currently pregnant
5. Co-existing medial problems / comorbidities (e.g., severe osteoporosis, tumors, inflammatory or infectious conditions, diabetes, angina, severe hypertension, RA, etc.)
6. Involvement in litigation of worker's compensation claim for low back
7. Physical therapy or chiropractic treatment for low back pain in the 3 months before initial examination
8. Any indication that might contraindicate spinal manipulative therapy.
9. Recent surgery to the lumbar or thoracic spine.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Alabama Physical Therapy & Acupuncture

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

James Dunning, DPT, MSc, FAAOMPT

DPT MSc FAAOMPT

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

James Dunning, DPT FAAOMPT

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

American Academy of Manipulative Therapy

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alabama Physical Therapy & Acupuncture

Montgomery, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AAMT0004

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.