Dry Needling and Spinal Manipulation vs. Conventional PT for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

NCT ID: NCT03167736

Last Updated: 2024-06-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

128 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-06-15

Study Completion Date

2020-03-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this research is to compare two different approaches for treating patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: electric dry needling and thrust manipulation versus impairment-based manual therapy, stretching, strengthening and electrothermal modalities. Physical therapists commonly use all of these techniques to treat lumbar spinal stenosis. This study is attempting to find out if one treatment strategy is more effective than the other.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients with lumbar spinal stenosis will be randomized to receive 1-2 treatment sessions per week for 6 weeks (up to 12 sessions total) of either: (1) electric dry needling and thrust manipulation or (2) impairment-based manual therapy, stretching, strengthening and electrothermal modalities

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Electric dry needling, manipulation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

electric dry needling, manipulation

Intervention Type OTHER

HVLA thrust manipulation to lumbar spine. Dry needling to lumbar/sacral paraspinal muscles and gluteus medium/minimus muscles. Treatment may include dry needling of the piriformis muscle, quadrates lumborum muscle and perineurial needling of sciatic/tibial nerve. Up to 12 treatment sessions over 6 weeks.

conventional physical therapy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

conventional physical therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Impairment-based manual therapy, stretching, strengthening and electrothermal modalities targeting the lumbar/sacral spine and hips. Up to 12 treatment sessions over 6 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

electric dry needling, manipulation

HVLA thrust manipulation to lumbar spine. Dry needling to lumbar/sacral paraspinal muscles and gluteus medium/minimus muscles. Treatment may include dry needling of the piriformis muscle, quadrates lumborum muscle and perineurial needling of sciatic/tibial nerve. Up to 12 treatment sessions over 6 weeks.

Intervention Type OTHER

conventional physical therapy

Impairment-based manual therapy, stretching, strengthening and electrothermal modalities targeting the lumbar/sacral spine and hips. Up to 12 treatment sessions over 6 weeks.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Adult over the age of 50 years old that is able to read, write and speak English
2. Symptoms of neurogenic claudication (pain in the buttock, thigh, or leg during ambulation that improves with rest) or radicular leg symptoms with associated neurological deficits on the physical examination for at least 12 weeks.
3. Confirmatory imaging (i.e. magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), myelography, ultrasound or X-ray of either central or lateral (foraminal) lumbar spinal stenosis at one or more levels in the lumbar spine.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Report of red flags to manual physical therapy to include: severe hypertension, infection, ankylosing spondylitis, neoplasm, uncontrolled diabetes, peripheral neuropathy, heart disease, stroke, chronic, ischemia, edema, severe varicosities, tumor, metabolic disease, prolonged steroid use, fracture, RA, osteoporosis, severe vascular disease, malignancy, etc.
2. Severe vascular, pulmonary, or coronary artery disease limiting participation in exercise, to include a walking program (including presence of absolute contraindications to submaximal exercise testing)
3. Severe degenerative stenosis with intractable pain and progressive neurological dysfunction
4. Lumbar spinal stenosis not caused by degeneration
5. Radiographic evidence of instability, degenerative spondylolisthesis, fracture or scoliosis of more than 15°
6. Lumbar herniated disc diagnosis during the last 12 months.
7. Previous lumbar surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis or instability (i.e. previous lumbar fusion, lumbar microdiscectomy, lumbar foraminotomy, lumbar laminectomy, etc.)
8. Psychiatric disorder or cognitively impaired.
9. Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Alabama Physical Therapy & Acupuncture

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

James Dunning, DPT, MSc, FAAOMPT

Primary Investigator and President of Spinal Manipulation Institute and Dry Needling Institute of the American Academy of Manipulative Therapy

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

James Dunning, DPT

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

American Academy of Manipulative Therapy

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Benchmark PT - Canton

Canton, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AAMT0011

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Chiropractic Dosage for Lumbar Stenosis
NCT00527527 COMPLETED PHASE2