Complications Associated With Delayed Admission to Spinal Injury Unit
NCT ID: NCT07015099
Last Updated: 2025-06-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
1400 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-07-31
2025-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Investigating the Energy Expenditure of Acute Spinal Cord Injured Patients
NCT03661294
Exoskeleton Use in Acute Rehab Post Spinal Cord Injury; a Safety and Feasibility Study
NCT03144830
Losing Balance to Prevent Falls After Spinal Cord Injury (RBT+FES)
NCT04881565
Improving Self-Management Skills Among People With Spinal Cord Injury
NCT03140501
High Intensity Exercise in Incomplete SCI
NCT03714997
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Complications including PUs can occur at any time following SCI from the acute phase, the rehabilitation phase and during the long term follow up period, however the highest PU risk is in the acute phase. Older age, decreased general health status and prolonged periods of immobilisation increases risk of PUs in the acute period. Specialised SCI rehabilitation centres are recommended to reduce the overall length of stay (LOS), mortality and reduce complications following SCI.
Variations exist globally between time to admission for specialist rehabilitation from onset of acute traumatic spinal cord injury with averages of 7.3-377 days reported in the literature. Some identified barriers to specialised SCI rehabilitation unit admission include lack of bed availability, shortage of skilled staff, inadequate finance, physical and environmental barriers resulting in increased wait times for specialist rehabilitation. Time to admission to specialist rehabilitation unit greater than one month have been shown to increase the occurrence of complications, including PUs at the time of rehabilitation admission.
A review conducted in 2003 by Bagnall et al., evaluated 22 articles which compared early admission to a specialist SCI unit to late admission and/or no admission. Whilst favourable neurological recovery was suggested for those who were admitted to a specialist centre compared to late or no admission, all the studies included in the review were deemed to be of poor quality, conducted in the 1980/1990s and, in most cases, could not separate the time of referral to an SCI centre to the time of admission.
In 2015, the All Party Parliamentary Group on SCI undertook an inquiry into the impact of nationwide SCI centres and the people they support. They reported that from 118 patients waiting for admission to a SCI unit, contact with an SCI unit on the same day as the injury was only made for 9 patients. The median time from injury to contact with a specialist centre was 6 days and the median time from injury to referral to a SCI centre was 8 days. On further investigation, 36% of cases required additional information before admission suitability, 24% of cases were due to bed availability, 20% of cases were accepted but were later deemed clinically unfit for transfer, 10% were deemed suitable for outreach or out-patient services and the final 10% of cases were deemed 'other'.
However, this is not the case in every part of the UK. In a recent 2023/24 report from The Queen Elizabeth National Spinal Injuries Unit (Glasgow), it was stated that there was no waiting list for admission to the SCI unit for that period, and of those patients referred to the centre, 58% of patients were admitted within one week. It was reported that the mean admission time to the SCI unit was 29 days, compared to the mean admission time for other spinal centres in the UK being 2-3 months.
The effect of delayed admission to a SCI centre for both the individual with injury and the surrounding family can be profound. Not only are patients often in a high state of uncertainty about their possible prognosis but they can also feel extremely overwhelmed by all the unanswered questions. For those who are waiting to be admitted to a SCI unit, a fear of losing their 'window of opportunity', of which may potentially alter their expected functional recovery, can be seen amongst the patients, highlighted in the evidence above. Delayed admission can also lead to a heightened risk of complications such as PUs, contractures and infections, secondary to an increased hospital stay and decreased functional recovery.
An initial service evaluation from January 2016 and December 2018 has been undertaken by clinicians on the MCSI (RJAH) in the last year to begin to investigate the impact of delayed referral to the MCSI on the prevalence of PUs, it found via multivariate analysis that age, sex and wait time to admission for specialist SCI rehabilitation were significant risk factors for the development of PUs. Here it is proposed to build on this study by undertaking a comprehensive analysis using the last decade of data, to evaluate the impact of delayed admission on SCI rehabilitation and neurological recovery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District NHS Trust
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital
Oswestry, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RL1 917
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.