Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE1/PHASE2
2 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-11-30
2016-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The hypothesis is that using the AMES device on the legs of chronic subjects with incomplete SCI will result in improved strength, sensation in the legs, and improved functional gait in the treated limbs.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Rehabilitation of the Upper Extremity With Enhanced Proprioceptive Feedback Following Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
NCT00833105
Training of Eccentric Lower Extremity Function After SCI
NCT02498548
Exoskeleton Use in Acute Rehab Post Spinal Cord Injury; a Safety and Feasibility Study
NCT03144830
Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation for Lower Limbs
NCT01949285
Protocol for Rapid Onset of Mobilization in Patients With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury
NCT04699474
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In this study 10 subjects, more than 1 year post injury, will be enrolled to test the safety and efficacy of a new type of robotic therapy device known as the AMES device. The aim of this Phase I/II study is to investigate the use of assisted movement and enhanced sensation (AMES) technology in the rehabilitation of the legs of participants with incomplete SCI.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
AMES Treatment
The subject will receive 30 treatment sessions, conducted 3-4 times per week on the AMES device. Each session will consist of testing followed by 40 minutes of treatment time (20 minutes per each leg) using the AMES device.
AMES Treatment
The AMES device rotates the ankle over a range of 30 degrees while vibrators stimulate the tendons attached to muscles that move the leg. Each participant will receive treatment of both lower extremities. Treatment of the 2 legs will be scheduled to run in the same session. The subject's task is to assist the motion of the device. The AMES treatment device couples assisted movement and tendon vibration (enhanced sensation) in 30 treatments which will each run approximately 40 minutes (20 minutes on the right leg and 20 minutes on the left leg).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
AMES Treatment
The AMES device rotates the ankle over a range of 30 degrees while vibrators stimulate the tendons attached to muscles that move the leg. Each participant will receive treatment of both lower extremities. Treatment of the 2 legs will be scheduled to run in the same session. The subject's task is to assist the motion of the device. The AMES treatment device couples assisted movement and tendon vibration (enhanced sensation) in 30 treatments which will each run approximately 40 minutes (20 minutes on the right leg and 20 minutes on the left leg).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* At least 1 year post incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
* Can tolerate sitting upright for at least one hour
* Capable of weight-bearing and taking a step with or without an assistive device
* On the ASIA sensory function (light touch), a score of at least 1 at the L4 and L5 level
* Primary ASIA Motor Criterion (PAMC) a total score of 4-12 for hip extensors, knee extensors, ankle dorsiflexors and ankle plantarflexors, with a minimum score of 1 for each of these muscles in the qualifying leg
Exclusion Criteria
* Concomitant TBI or stroke (Patients who sustained mild head injury during the trauma with no evidence of structural abnormalities on brain images will qualify for the study), or other neurological injury or disease
* DVT of the treated extremity
* Peripheral nerve injury of the treated extremity
* Osteo- or rheumatoid-arthritis limiting range of motion
* Contractures equal to or greater than 50% of the normal ROM
* Skin condition not tolerant of device or sitting upright
* Progressive neurodegenerative disorder
* Botox treatment of the treated extremity in the prior 5 month
* Chronic ITB therapy
* Uncontrolled seizure disorder
* Uncontrolled high blood pressure/angina
* Pain in affected limb or exercise intolerance
* Participation in another therapy or activity-based program
* Combined score on ASIA motor function for knee extensors, ankle dorsiflexors and ankle plantarflexors outside the range of 3-9
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Shepherd Center, Atlanta GA
OTHER
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
NIH
Oregon Health and Science University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Paul J. Cordo
Study Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Paul J Cordo, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Oregon Health and Science University
Andrew Nemecek, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Oregon Health and Science University
Deborah Backus, PT, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Shepherd Center, Atlanta GA
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Shepherd Center, Crawford Research Center
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB00007762
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.