Restoration of Standing and Walking With ISMS in Humans
NCT ID: NCT02899858
Last Updated: 2022-02-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-01-31
2019-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
RTsMS and Body Weight-support Treadmill Training After Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
NCT06886308
Standing, Stepping and Voluntary Movement Spinal Cord Epidural Stimulation
NCT04123847
Epi Stim to Facilitate Standing and Stepping
NCT02339233
Restoring Walking With a Powered Exoskeleton After Spinal Cord Injury
NCT02322125
Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation for Restoring Walking in Spinal Cord Injury
NCT07306052
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The potential volunteers will be asked to review and sign a screening consent form prior to initial screening. This is to ensure that the ideal two patients are selected for this study and that foreseeable issues are identified and risks minimized for the volunteers. The subjects must have a stable, complete spinal cord injury involving their upper thoracic spinal cord (T2-8 region), and are otherwise planning to undergo a spine surgery involving the lower thoracic spinal cord.
Subjects who have volunteered for this study will undergo their intended spinal surgery by the clinical team. The usual indications for undergoing such a surgery is either to correct a deformity involving the lower thoracic region, or stabilizing the lower thoracic region due to chronic instability from degenerative disease. The surgery intended for clinical treatment must involve exposure of the T9-T12 spinal lamina. However, exposure of the spinal cord through a dural opening would not normally be performed in this clinical scenario. The experimental portion of the surgery begins then, with a laminectomy of T9-T12 and exposure of the spinal cord through a durotomy using standard neurosurgical techniques for spinal cord exposure. The spinal cord in this region will then be mapped and stimulated using ISMS and the effects on the legs measured to determine if the circuitry exists to potentially allow standing or walking through the use of ISMS. The research requests subjects to specifically allow 2 hours of extra time during the routine spinal surgery to perform this study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
IntraSpinal Micro-Stimulation
IntraSpinal Micro-Stimulation will be performed using a maximum of 16 electrodes inserted along each side of spinal cord that correlate with movements created across all 3 joints (hips, knees, and ankles)
Movement Assessment
Documentation of ASIA A (T2-8) status at Belmont Gait Lab
MRI Scan
Total MRI of spine to evaluate condition of spinal cord
IntraSpinal Micro-Stimulation
IntraSpinal Micro-Stimulation will be performed using a maximum of 16 electrodes inserted along each side of spinal cord that correlate with movements created across all 3 joints (hips, knees, and ankles)
Follow up clinical exam
All subjects will be expected to return for a follow-up visit with Drs. Konrad at 1, 3 and 6 month follow up visits.
Post Op MRI Scan
An MRI will be obtained at 3 months following the procedure to document the impact of the mapping procedure on spinal cord anatomy.
Follow up gait assessment
Follow-up assessment with the Belmont Gait Lab will be performed at the 6 month follow up visit
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Movement Assessment
Documentation of ASIA A (T2-8) status at Belmont Gait Lab
MRI Scan
Total MRI of spine to evaluate condition of spinal cord
IntraSpinal Micro-Stimulation
IntraSpinal Micro-Stimulation will be performed using a maximum of 16 electrodes inserted along each side of spinal cord that correlate with movements created across all 3 joints (hips, knees, and ankles)
Follow up clinical exam
All subjects will be expected to return for a follow-up visit with Drs. Konrad at 1, 3 and 6 month follow up visits.
Post Op MRI Scan
An MRI will be obtained at 3 months following the procedure to document the impact of the mapping procedure on spinal cord anatomy.
Follow up gait assessment
Follow-up assessment with the Belmont Gait Lab will be performed at the 6 month follow up visit
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Complete paraplegia (ASIA A classification) as a result of a spinal cord injury between the levels of T2-8.
i. No motor or sensory function below the level of injury as determined by a physician.
ii. No voluntary bladder function - defined as the inability to sense bladder fullness or voluntary contraction of the bladder (meets criteria for no sacral sparing).
iii. Stable paraplegia.
3. Patients with involuntary spasms are allowed. However, spasticity must be less than Ashworth 4 or spasm rating of 3 or less.
4. History of spinal cord injury greater than 1 year.
5. Intent to undergo spine surgery involving exposure of at least T9-T12 vertebral lamina.
6. MRI studies performed within the past year showing presence of spinal cord between T8-L1 with reasonable normal anatomical shape. No chronic infections.
7. Ability to travel to Vanderbilt Medical Center.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Pregnancy.
3. Presence of a neurostimulator, bladder stimulator, cardiac stimulator or other electrical stimulator device implant.
4. Inability to transfer from wheel chair to chair or bed.
5. Inability to tolerate 1 hour of physical activity such as gait training in a harness.
6. Severe depression requiring active medical treatment or counseling.
7. Cognitive impairment that places the study volunteer under the 6th grade reading level.
8. Inability to provide consent.
9. Intradural or extradural masses compressing or displacing the spinal cord between T8-L1 region.
10. Significant change in motor or sensory function over the previous year.
11. History of spinal cord injury less than 1 year.
12. Previous laminectomy and intradural spinal cord procedure involving the region of T9-T12.
13. Patients with involuntary spasms with rigidity more than Ashworth 4 or spasm rating of 3 or more.
18 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Alberta
OTHER
Belmont University
OTHER
Vanderbilt University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Peter Konrad
MD, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Peter Konrad, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mushahwar VK, Jacobs PL, Normann RA, Triolo RJ, Kleitman N. New functional electrical stimulation approaches to standing and walking. J Neural Eng. 2007 Sep;4(3):S181-97. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/4/3/S05. Epub 2007 Aug 22.
Bamford JA, Mushahwar VK. Intraspinal microstimulation for the recovery of function following spinal cord injury. Prog Brain Res. 2011;194:227-39. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53815-4.00004-2.
Study Documents
Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.
Document Type: Study Protocol
View DocumentOther Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
140503
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.