Restoration of Standing and Walking With ISMS in Humans

NCT ID: NCT02899858

Last Updated: 2022-02-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-01-31

Study Completion Date

2019-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Spinal cord neural circuitry exists in the lumbar enlargement that makes it possible to stand and create synergistic, rhythmic stepping activity in the lower limbs. In the past 20 years, clinicians have tried to reengage such these circuits for standing and walking in the lower spinal cord of paralyzed humans through novel paradigms of physical therapy, pharmacological stimulation of the spinal cord, or recently - epidural stimulation of the spinal cord. Although standing and stepping with these maneuvers are rudimentary at best, these human studies offer promise to restore controlled, lower extremity movement to the spinal cord injured (SCI) individual. Evidence from animal data suggests that more focal activation of intraspinal circuitry (IntraSpinal Micro-Stimulation - ISMS) would produce more fatigue resistant, natural standing and stepping activity in humans. To date, there has been no direct confirmation of such circuitry in the spinal cord of bipedal humans who have been paralyzed. Furthermore, mapping of such circuitry would provide the basis of a novel intraspinal neuroprosthetic that should be able to restore control of standing or walking in a manner that is much more physiologically normal and tolerable than by stimulating each individual muscle group. Proof of the existence of these spinal circuits in man, and the ability to activate and control these circuits by first mapping the spinal cord is the basis of this proposal.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Two study volunteers who are completely paralyzed (T2-8 region) to undergo an evaluation of ISMS during an otherwise normal thoracic spinal surgical procedure.

The potential volunteers will be asked to review and sign a screening consent form prior to initial screening. This is to ensure that the ideal two patients are selected for this study and that foreseeable issues are identified and risks minimized for the volunteers. The subjects must have a stable, complete spinal cord injury involving their upper thoracic spinal cord (T2-8 region), and are otherwise planning to undergo a spine surgery involving the lower thoracic spinal cord.

Subjects who have volunteered for this study will undergo their intended spinal surgery by the clinical team. The usual indications for undergoing such a surgery is either to correct a deformity involving the lower thoracic region, or stabilizing the lower thoracic region due to chronic instability from degenerative disease. The surgery intended for clinical treatment must involve exposure of the T9-T12 spinal lamina. However, exposure of the spinal cord through a dural opening would not normally be performed in this clinical scenario. The experimental portion of the surgery begins then, with a laminectomy of T9-T12 and exposure of the spinal cord through a durotomy using standard neurosurgical techniques for spinal cord exposure. The spinal cord in this region will then be mapped and stimulated using ISMS and the effects on the legs measured to determine if the circuitry exists to potentially allow standing or walking through the use of ISMS. The research requests subjects to specifically allow 2 hours of extra time during the routine spinal surgery to perform this study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Cord Injury Paralysis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

IntraSpinal Micro-Stimulation

IntraSpinal Micro-Stimulation will be performed using a maximum of 16 electrodes inserted along each side of spinal cord that correlate with movements created across all 3 joints (hips, knees, and ankles)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Movement Assessment

Intervention Type OTHER

Documentation of ASIA A (T2-8) status at Belmont Gait Lab

MRI Scan

Intervention Type OTHER

Total MRI of spine to evaluate condition of spinal cord

IntraSpinal Micro-Stimulation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

IntraSpinal Micro-Stimulation will be performed using a maximum of 16 electrodes inserted along each side of spinal cord that correlate with movements created across all 3 joints (hips, knees, and ankles)

Follow up clinical exam

Intervention Type OTHER

All subjects will be expected to return for a follow-up visit with Drs. Konrad at 1, 3 and 6 month follow up visits.

Post Op MRI Scan

Intervention Type OTHER

An MRI will be obtained at 3 months following the procedure to document the impact of the mapping procedure on spinal cord anatomy.

Follow up gait assessment

Intervention Type OTHER

Follow-up assessment with the Belmont Gait Lab will be performed at the 6 month follow up visit

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Movement Assessment

Documentation of ASIA A (T2-8) status at Belmont Gait Lab

Intervention Type OTHER

MRI Scan

Total MRI of spine to evaluate condition of spinal cord

Intervention Type OTHER

IntraSpinal Micro-Stimulation

IntraSpinal Micro-Stimulation will be performed using a maximum of 16 electrodes inserted along each side of spinal cord that correlate with movements created across all 3 joints (hips, knees, and ankles)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Follow up clinical exam

All subjects will be expected to return for a follow-up visit with Drs. Konrad at 1, 3 and 6 month follow up visits.

Intervention Type OTHER

Post Op MRI Scan

An MRI will be obtained at 3 months following the procedure to document the impact of the mapping procedure on spinal cord anatomy.

Intervention Type OTHER

Follow up gait assessment

Follow-up assessment with the Belmont Gait Lab will be performed at the 6 month follow up visit

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age 18-50 years old; male or female (no preference).
2. Complete paraplegia (ASIA A classification) as a result of a spinal cord injury between the levels of T2-8.

i. No motor or sensory function below the level of injury as determined by a physician.

ii. No voluntary bladder function - defined as the inability to sense bladder fullness or voluntary contraction of the bladder (meets criteria for no sacral sparing).

iii. Stable paraplegia.
3. Patients with involuntary spasms are allowed. However, spasticity must be less than Ashworth 4 or spasm rating of 3 or less.
4. History of spinal cord injury greater than 1 year.
5. Intent to undergo spine surgery involving exposure of at least T9-T12 vertebral lamina.
6. MRI studies performed within the past year showing presence of spinal cord between T8-L1 with reasonable normal anatomical shape. No chronic infections.
7. Ability to travel to Vanderbilt Medical Center.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Acute medical conditions that are under active treatment. Examples include active urinary tract infection, respiratory illness, decubital ulcers, fractures, upper extremity injury, back pain.
2. Pregnancy.
3. Presence of a neurostimulator, bladder stimulator, cardiac stimulator or other electrical stimulator device implant.
4. Inability to transfer from wheel chair to chair or bed.
5. Inability to tolerate 1 hour of physical activity such as gait training in a harness.
6. Severe depression requiring active medical treatment or counseling.
7. Cognitive impairment that places the study volunteer under the 6th grade reading level.
8. Inability to provide consent.
9. Intradural or extradural masses compressing or displacing the spinal cord between T8-L1 region.
10. Significant change in motor or sensory function over the previous year.
11. History of spinal cord injury less than 1 year.
12. Previous laminectomy and intradural spinal cord procedure involving the region of T9-T12.
13. Patients with involuntary spasms with rigidity more than Ashworth 4 or spasm rating of 3 or more.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Alberta

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Belmont University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Vanderbilt University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Peter Konrad

MD, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Peter Konrad, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Vanderbilt University

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mushahwar VK, Jacobs PL, Normann RA, Triolo RJ, Kleitman N. New functional electrical stimulation approaches to standing and walking. J Neural Eng. 2007 Sep;4(3):S181-97. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/4/3/S05. Epub 2007 Aug 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17873417 (View on PubMed)

Bamford JA, Mushahwar VK. Intraspinal microstimulation for the recovery of function following spinal cord injury. Prog Brain Res. 2011;194:227-39. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53815-4.00004-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21867807 (View on PubMed)

Study Documents

Access uploaded study-related documents such as protocols, statistical analysis plans, or lay summaries.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

140503

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Spinal Cord Injury Leg Rehabilitation
NCT01498991 TERMINATED PHASE1/PHASE2
AB Gait Estim Neurophysiology
NCT06430164 RECRUITING NA
NIBS Therapy in Subacute Spinal Cord Injury
NCT06247904 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
Improving Walking After Spinal Cord Injury
NCT07223710 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2