Fine-needle Biopsy Combined With Macroscopic On-site Evaluation for Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions

NCT ID: NCT06994611

Last Updated: 2025-06-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

148 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-06-25

Study Completion Date

2026-08-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the diagnostic efficacy, core tissue acquisition ability, number of punctures and puncture time of macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) and two punctures alone in Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for solid pancreatic lesions. The main questions it aims to answer is: whether the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNB performed with two needle passes is not inferior to that of MOSE.

Participants with solid pancreatic lesions who needs histological diagnosis will receive EUS-FNB using 22G Franseen.

In Group 1, the macroscopically visible core (MVC) of the specimen was assessed. If the MVC of the sample obtained from the first needle was ≥10mm, the tissue strip was placed in Bottle A and fixed with formalin. A second needle was then used to obtain another tissue strip, which was directly placed into Bottle B containing formalin. However, if the MVC of the first needle sample was \< 10mm, the puncture procedure was continued until the cumulative length of sample's MVC was ≥10mm, and all the sample collected during this process were placed into Bottle A and fixed with formalin. In Group 2, two needles were used to obtain tissue strips, and all the tissue strips were placed into Bottle A formalin.

Researchers will compare the diagnostic efficacy, core tissue acquisition ability, number of punctures and puncture time between the MOSE technique and two-needle puncture method.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pancreatic Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MOSE group

Patients assigned to this group will receive EUS-FNB as routine. The obtained tissue will be evaluated by Macroscopic On-site Evaluation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

MOSE application

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The length of the tissue strips was judged using the specimen table and photographed for record. If the MVC of the first needle sample was ≥10mm, the tissue strip was placed into bottle A formalin for fixation. A second needle of tissue strip was pushed directly into the B-bottle formalin. If the first needle sample MVC was \< 10mm, the puncture was continued until the total length of sample MVC was ≥10mm, and all samples were placed into bottle A formalin.

Non-mose group

Patients assigned to this group will receive EUS-FNB as routine. Two needles were punctured and all tissue strips were placed into bottle A formalin.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional processing

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Two needles were punctured and all tissue strips were placed into bottle A formalin.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

MOSE application

The length of the tissue strips was judged using the specimen table and photographed for record. If the MVC of the first needle sample was ≥10mm, the tissue strip was placed into bottle A formalin for fixation. A second needle of tissue strip was pushed directly into the B-bottle formalin. If the first needle sample MVC was \< 10mm, the puncture was continued until the total length of sample MVC was ≥10mm, and all samples were placed into bottle A formalin.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional processing

Two needles were punctured and all tissue strips were placed into bottle A formalin.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* (Before the trial, subjects must meet all of the requirements listed below in order to be enrolled)

1. 18-80 years old (inclusive), male and female;
2. patients with pancreatic solid mass \> 1cm detected by CT/MRI/PET-CT or EUS and requiring EUS-FNB diagnosis.
3. written informed consent was obtained;

Exclusion Criteria

* (Before the trial, participants could not be enrolled if they met any of the following requirements)

1. contraindications to endoscopy, such as severe cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases;
2. bleeding coagulation dysfunction (prothrombin international normalized ratio ≥1.5, platelet count ≤ 50 000) or use of antiplatelet drugs;
3. confirmed pregnancy or possible pregnancy;
4. pathological diagnosis has been obtained by other methods;
5. refuse to participate in the study, are participating in another observational clinical trial, or have participated in another clinical trial within 60 days.
6. other situations where EUS-FNB could not be performed.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Changhai Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Zhaoshen Li

Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Zhao Shen Li, M.D

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), shanghai, China

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Changhai Hospital

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jia Yi Ma, M.D

Role: CONTACT

+8613621819595

Kai Xuan Wang, M.D

Role: CONTACT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KTSB20250327028

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.