Randomized Trial Comparing Fecal Testing (FIT) to Colonoscopy for Post-polypectomy Surveillance

NCT ID: NCT06983639

Last Updated: 2026-01-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

4000 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-01-09

Study Completion Date

2050-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

From observational studies, it is know that the risk of developing colorectal cancer after polyp removal is lower if the patients adheres to surveillance recommendations. However, colonoscopy is burdensome for patients and colonoscopy availability is limited in many parts of the world. In addition, more than half of surveillance colonoscopies are without any findings. The trial investigates whether surveillance using fecal testing for blod is as good as colonoscopy after removal of colorectal polyps.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the world and develops from benign colorectal polyps. Colonoscopy with polyp removal reduces colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Patients who have had polyps removed are at increased risk for metachronous polyps and subsequent cancer and are referred to colonoscopic surveillance at regular intervals, the first one usually scheduled three years after polypectomy. Today, these comprise 15-25% of all colonoscopies, but in \>85%, no high-risk pathology is found. Thus, post-polypectomy surveillance consumes major resources without benefit to the patients, and these resources are much needed for colonoscopies due to other indications in an aging population. Additionally, colonoscopy requires burdensome bowel-cleansing, discomfort during the examination, absenteeism from work and sometimes need for an escort. Severe complications like bleeding and perforation may occur. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of benign lesions occur in a large proportion of examinations as most polyps will never develop into colorectal cancer, even if left untreated.

Sensitive fecal occult blood tests (FIT) have been developed that may detect colorectal cancer with the same sensitivity as colonoscopy. The test is cheap, is easily distributed by mail and may be performed at home. If the test detects blood, colonoscopy is indicated. FIT has been used in colorectal screening program for years, but has not yet been thoroughly investigated for post-polypectomy surveillance purposes.

The trial is a pragmatic non-inferiority randomized trial in which patients who are eligible for 3-year colonoscopic surveillance are offered either colonoscopy (standard care) or FIT followed by a colonoscopy in case of a positive test result (Figure 1). FIT may decrease colonoscopy surveillance demand by \> 50%, which equals a cost saving of almost 30,000,000 Norwegian kroner annually. By proposing FIT for post-polypectomy surveillance, the trial introduce decentralized and personalized medical follow-up of these patients, and at the same time reduce work-absenteeism, patient discomfort, risk of complications and importantly: overdiagnosis and overtreatment of benign colorectal lesions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Neoplasms

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Colonoscopy

Colonoscopy surveillance after polyp removal

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Colonoscopy

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Colonoscopy after polyp removal according to guidelines

Fecal blood testing

Fecal testing as surveillance after polypectomy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Fecal occult blood testing

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Fecal testing for blood as surveillance efter polyp removal

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fecal occult blood testing

Fecal testing for blood as surveillance efter polyp removal

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Colonoscopy

Colonoscopy after polyp removal according to guidelines

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* High-quality baseline colonoscopy with adequat cleansing and cecal intubation
* Remocval of at least one advanced adenoma
* Clean colon (all polyps removed)
* Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Colorectal cancer
* History of surgical colon resection for any reason
* Genetic cancer syndrome (adenomatous or serrated polyposis syndrome; Lynch or Lynch-like syndrome)
* ≥ 10 adenomas at baseline colonoscopy (cumulative)
* History of advanced serrated lesion, defined as SSL≥ 10mm or with dysplasia
* Inflammatory bowel disease
* On-going palliative care for any reason
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sykehuset Ostfold

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Akershus

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Vestre Viken Hospital Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sykehuset Telemark Hospital Trust

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Helse Møre og Romsdal HF

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

St. Olavs Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital of Northern Norway, Tromsø, Norway

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sykehuset i Vestfold HF

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Helse Stavanger HF

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Turku University Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Helsinki University Central Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Randers Regional Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Viborg Regional Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Gødstrup Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Horsens Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sorlandet Hospital HF

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sørlandet sykehus HF

Arendal, Agder, Norway

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Øyvind Holme

Role: CONTACT

004738073000

Michael Bretthauer

Role: CONTACT

004790132480

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Chief of gastroenterology, MD

Role: primary

004792660445

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

744836

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.