Effect of Topical Application of Atorvastatin Gel Versus Hyaluronic Acid on Immediate Loading Dental Implant in Posterior Maxilla

NCT ID: NCT06976866

Last Updated: 2025-05-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

21 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-07-13

Study Completion Date

2025-05-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background: In recent years, there has been a rise in the use of immediate loading protocols; however, the complex anatomy of the posterior maxilla presents challenges. Currently, there is a lack of comparative studies assessing the effects of hyaluronic acid and atorvastatin gel on enhancing bone density in this region in conjunction with immediate loading. This study aimed to compare the effect of topical application of atorvastatin gel versus hyaluronic acid around immediately loaded dental implant that replacing missed maxillary posterior teeth.

Patients and methods: twenty one patients were chosen from the Outpatient Clinic in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University seeking implant placement. Patients were divided randomly and equally into three groups: group I (control group): 7 patients received implants without coating by any materials. Group II \[Hyaluronic acid (HA) group\]: 7 patients received implants coated with HA gel .Group III \[atorvastatin (ATV) group\]: 7 patients received implants coated with ATV gel. Clinical evaluation of implant stability was performed at the time of implant insertion and after 3 and 6 months postoperative. Also, peri-implant pocket depth (PPD) and modified sulcus bleeding index (mSBI) were evaluated. Radiographical evaluation of bone density (BD) was performed immediately and after 6 months postoperatively of implant loading using CBCT. All clinical and radiographic data were subjected to statistical analysis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

In Recent Years, There Has Been a Rise in the Use of Immediate Loading Protocols Dental Implant Stability

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

hyaluronic acid

\[Hyaluronic acid (HA) group\]: 7 patients received implants coated with HA gel .

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

implant surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

surgery

atorvastatin

\[atorvastatin (ATV) group\]: 7 patients received implants coated with ATV gel

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

implant surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

surgery

control

group I (control group): 7 patients received implants without coating by any materials.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

implant surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

surgery

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

implant surgery

surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

hyaluronic acid around implant atorvastatin around implant

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\-


* patients with one or more missing maxillary posterior teeth
* age ranging from 18 to 45 years
* patient's cooperation
* motivation and good oral hygiene
* adequate occlusion (proper interarch space).

Exclusion Criteria

* individuals with systemic or local diseases that are contraindicative of surgery or implant placement
* pregnant individuals
* individuals with any bone diseases that may impede bone healing
* smokers
* individuals who exhibit parafunctional habits like bruxism and clenching.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Amira attia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Amira attia

assistant professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Amira Attia

Al Mansurah, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

M0103023OS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Simvastatin Around Immediate Implant
NCT04803500 COMPLETED PHASE2
IMMEDIATE IMPLANT With Different Types of Membranes
NCT06657651 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA