Impact of Frailty on Nalbuphine Dose for Postoperative Analgesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic GI Surgery
NCT ID: NCT06953570
Last Updated: 2025-05-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
120 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-10-01
2026-10-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Comprehensive Intestinal Protection Strategy on Postoperative Intestinal Complications
NCT03216759
Comparison of the Effects of Fentanyl, Oxycodone, Butorphanol on Gastrointestinal Function
NCT04295109
The Impact of Low-Dose Esketamine Combined With Ciprofol on the Quality of Early Postoperative Recovery Among Elderly Patients Undergoing Painless Gastroscopy
NCT06617039
Comparison of the Effects of Continuous Epidural Analgesia and Continuous Intravenous Analgesia on Postoperative Bowel Movement in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gastrectomy
NCT02458573
Effect of IV Nalbuphine on Nausea and Vomiting Following Intrathecal Morphine
NCT05704673
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Enhanced pain perception.
2. Decreased pain tolerance.
3. Changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.
4. Iatrogenic titration patterns.
Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) is one of the most commonly used analgesic methods, which can shorten hospital stays, reduce the incidence of perioperative complications, and improve quality of life. However, elderly patients are more prone to hypotension, nausea, and vomiting, necessitating additional antiemetics and rescue analgesics. Nalbuphine, a dual-acting drug as a κ-receptor agonist and μ-receptor antagonist, has analgesic potency comparable to morphine and a longer duration of action (3-6 hours). However, studies have shown that due to reduced liver and kidney function, the metabolism of Nalbuphine is prolonged in elderly frail patients. Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective α2-receptor agonist with sedative, analgesic, anxiolytic, and sympatholytic properties, can reduce postoperative cardiovascular complications, enhance opioid analgesia, and lower the incidence of postoperative delirium, making it an ideal choice for multimodal analgesia. However, no studies have yet explored the dose-response relationship of dexmedetomidine combined with Nalbuphine in elderly frail patients, especially the impact of different degrees of frailty (such as mFI classification) on the median effective dose (ED50) of Nalbuphine.
This study, for the first time, employs the modified Dixon up-and-down sequential method to systematically evaluate the influence of different degrees of frailty on the ED50 of Nalbuphine-dexmedetomidine combination analgesia in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery, and to analyze its analgesic effects and complication risks. The results of this study will provide evidence-based guidance for precise pain management in frail patients and promote the application of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) principles in the elderly frail population.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
frailty group(F)(mFI≧0.27)
The initial PCA pump formulation for the first patient was set as: dexmedetomidine 2 μg/kg, nalbuphine 1 mg/kg, ondansetron 16 mg, diluted to 100 ml with normal saline. The study employed a modified Dixon up-and-down sequential method, with an initial dose of nalbuphine at 1 mg/kg. A resting Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score \> 3 within 24 hours postoperatively was defined as a negative response. If a negative response occurred, the dose of nalbuphine for the next patient in the same group would be increased by 0.1 mg/kg (e.g., 1.0 → 1.1 mg/kg). Conversely, if a positive response occurred, the dose for the next patient would be decreased by 0.1 mg/kg (e.g., 1.0 → 0.9 mg/kg). The trial was terminated when eight consecutive negative-to-positive inflection points were observed.
No interventions assigned to this group
pre-frailty group (P)(0<mFI<0.27)
The initial PCA pump formulation for the first patient was set as: dexmedetomidine 2 μg/kg, nalbuphine 1 mg/kg, ondansetron 16 mg, diluted to 100 ml with normal saline. The study employed a modified Dixon up-and-down sequential method, with an initial dose of nalbuphine at 1 mg/kg. A resting Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score \> 3 within 24 hours postoperatively was defined as a negative response. If a negative response occurred, the dose of nalbuphine for the next patient in the same group would be increased by 0.1 mg/kg (e.g., 1.0 → 1.1 mg/kg). Conversely, if a positive response occurred, the dose for the next patient would be decreased by 0.1 mg/kg (e.g., 1.0 → 0.9 mg/kg). The trial was terminated when eight consecutive negative-to-positive inflection points were observed.
No interventions assigned to this group
non-frailty group (N)(mFI=0)
The initial PCA pump formulation for the first patient was set as: dexmedetomidine 2 μg/kg, nalbuphine 1 mg/kg, ondansetron 16 mg, diluted to 100 ml with normal saline. The study employed a modified Dixon up-and-down sequential method, with an initial dose of nalbuphine at 1 mg/kg. A resting Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score \> 3 within 24 hours postoperatively was defined as a negative response. If a negative response occurred, the dose of nalbuphine for the next patient in the same group would be increased by 0.1 mg/kg (e.g., 1.0 → 1.1 mg/kg). Conversely, if a positive response occurred, the dose for the next patient would be decreased by 0.1 mg/kg (e.g., 1.0 → 0.9 mg/kg). The trial was terminated when eight consecutive negative-to-positive inflection points were observed.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. ASA grade I-Ⅳ;
3. Age ≥65 years (2);
4. 18.5 kg/m²≤BMI\<30 kg/m²;
5. Sign the informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy were administered 1 month before surgery, and sedatives, antiemetic or antipruritic drugs were administered 24 hours before surgery
3. History of drug abuse, chronic pain, mental illness, or allergy to the drugs used in this study
4. Plan postoperative intubation or transfer to ICU;
5. Participated in other clinical studies within the past 3 months.
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Yongtao Sun
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yongtao Sun
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yongtao Sun, Ph.D.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Qianfoshan Hospital, The First Hospital affiliated of Shandong First Medical University
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Helme RD, Meliala A, Gibson SJ. Methodologic factors which contribute to variations in experimental pain threshold reported for older people. Neurosci Lett. 2004 May 6;361(1-3):144-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2003.12.014.
Schofield PA. The assessment and management of peri-operative pain in older adults. Anaesthesia. 2014 Jan;69 Suppl 1:54-60. doi: 10.1111/anae.12520.
Joshi GP. Multimodal analgesia techniques and postoperative rehabilitation. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2005 Mar;23(1):185-202. doi: 10.1016/j.atc.2004.11.010.
Yeh YC, Lin TF, Lin FS, Wang YP, Lin CJ, Sun WZ. Combination of opioid agonist and agonist-antagonist: patient-controlled analgesia requirement and adverse events among different-ratio morphine and nalbuphine admixtures for postoperative pain. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Oct;101(4):542-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen213. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
Pasternak GW. Molecular biology of opioid analgesia. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005 May;29(5 Suppl):S2-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.01.011.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Nalbuphine
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.