Oliceridine on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT ID: NCT07026162
Last Updated: 2025-07-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE4
96 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-07-21
2026-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Can Oliceridine reduce the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in gynecological laparoscopic surgery? Does the incidence of PONV differ between patients receiving Oliceridine and those receiving the commonly used analgesic sufentanil in gynecological laparoscopic surgery? Are there any opioid-related adverse reactions in gynecological laparoscopic surgery patients using Oliceridine?
Participants will:
Receive Oliceridine or sufentanil for anesthesia induction, maintenance, and postoperative pain management.
Vital signs during surgery and the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting will be recorded.
Be followed up for at least 48 hours.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Oliceridine Analgesia on Postoperative Nause and Vomiting
NCT06411665
Intravenous Versus Intraperitoneal Instillation of Ondansetron for Decreasing Incidence of Nausea and Vomiting After Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgeries.
NCT05317611
Opioid Sparing Anaesthesia for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery
NCT04706897
Intrathecal Atropine Versus Intravenous Ondasetron in Post Operative Nausea Due to Intrathecal Morphine
NCT05137288
Opioid-free Anesthesia in Gynecologic Surgery
NCT04700761
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled trial compares oliceridine versus sufentanil for anesthesia/analgesia in gynecologic laparoscopy at Second Xiangya Hospital. The study features:
1. Randomization: Computer-generated 1:1 allocation via sealed envelopes
2. Blinding: Triple-blinding (participants, clinicians, outcome assessors) maintained through: Identical drug preparations (volume/appearance-matched);Separation between anesthesia nurses preparing drugs and clinical/research teams
3. Control: Active comparator (sufentanil) reflecting current standard practice.
Technical Methodology:
1. Anesthesia Protocol: Standardized induction with midazolam (0.05-0.10 mg/kg), study drug (sufentanil 0.3 μg/kg vs oliceridine 0.06 mg/kg), propofol (1.5-2.0 mg/kg), and cisatracurium (0.2-0.3 mg/kg). Maintenance via TIVA: propofol (4-10 mg/kg/h) + remifentanil (0.1-0.2 μg/kg/min). Pre-incision/closure boluses: Study drug dosed per group (sufentanil 0.1-0.2 μg/kg vs oliceridine 0.02-0.04 mg/kg).
2. Analgesia Management: PCA pump configuration: Sufentanil group: 2 μg/kg in 100 mL NS; Oliceridine group: 0.4 mg/kg in 100 mL NS; Fixed adjuncts: ondansetron 8 mg + dexamethasone 10 mg.Demand dose: 2 mL (lockout 10 min), max 10 mL/h.
3. Rescue Protocols: Analgesia: Sufentanil 5 μg or oliceridine 0.2 mg IV PRN; PONV: Ondansetron 4 mg + dexamethasone 5 mg; haloperidol 1 mg if refractory.
Quality Assurance Measures:
Anesthesia depth monitoring: BIS-guided propofol titration; Hemodynamic stability: Protocolized management of hypotension (defined as MAP \<65 mmHg); Data validation: 10% random audit of time-stamped outcomes (PACU discharge, bowel recovery).
Pharmacokinetic Considerations:
Oliceridine dosing based on morphine equivalence (1mg ≈ 5mg morphine); Adjusted intraoperative dosing to account for context-sensitive half-time differences vs sufentanil.
Statistical Approach: Sample size:
Powered for PONV incidence difference (α=0.05, β=0.2); Analysis: ITT principle with sensitivity analysis for protocol deviations; Covariate adjustment: Stratification by Apfel risk factors (female sex, non-smoking, PONV history, opioid use).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Oliceridine group
Anesthesia and analgesia with Oliceridine
Oliceridine
For gynecological laparoscopic surgery, general anesthesia was induced with Oliceridine at a dose of 0.06 mg/kg (Yichang Renfu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., China). Intraoperative analgesia was administered with a total dose of Oliceridine ranging from 0.1 to 0.15 mg/kg. Postoperatively, Oliceridine was administered through a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) system.
Sufentanil group
Anesthesia and analgesia with sufentanil
Sufentanil
For gynecological laparoscopic surgery, general anesthesia was induced with Sufentanil at a dose of 0.3 µg/kg (Yichang Renfu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., China). Intraoperative analgesia was provided with a total dose of Oliceridine ranging from 0.5 to 0.8 µg/kg. Postoperatively, Sufentanil was administered through a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) system.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Oliceridine
For gynecological laparoscopic surgery, general anesthesia was induced with Oliceridine at a dose of 0.06 mg/kg (Yichang Renfu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., China). Intraoperative analgesia was administered with a total dose of Oliceridine ranging from 0.1 to 0.15 mg/kg. Postoperatively, Oliceridine was administered through a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) system.
Sufentanil
For gynecological laparoscopic surgery, general anesthesia was induced with Sufentanil at a dose of 0.3 µg/kg (Yichang Renfu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., China). Intraoperative analgesia was provided with a total dose of Oliceridine ranging from 0.5 to 0.8 µg/kg. Postoperatively, Sufentanil was administered through a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) system.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age 18-65 years;
3. ASA physical status I-III;
4. Body mass index (BMI) 18-30 kg/m².
Exclusion Criteria
2. History of allergy to opioid drugs, propofol, soybeans, or eggs;
3. Recent use of sedatives, analgesics, or monoamine oxidase inhibitors;
4. History of alcohol abuse;
5. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome;
6. Difficult airway;
7. Psychiatric or neurological disorders; communication disorders;
8. Women who are lactating or pregnant.
Withdrawal criteria:
1. Subject requests withdrawal or withdraws voluntarily;
2. Change in surgical method requiring combined gastrointestinal surgery;
3. Occurrence of allergy to the investigational drug or life-threatening complications;
4. Reoperation within 48 hours postoperatively due to bleeding or other factors.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
YanYing Xiao
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
YanYing Xiao
Associate Professor of the Department of Anesthesiology, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central south University
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Xiao
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Changsha, Hunan, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LYEC2024-0425
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.