Oliceridine on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery

NCT ID: NCT07026162

Last Updated: 2025-07-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

96 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-07-21

Study Completion Date

2026-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate the impact of the analgesic Oliceridine on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) following gynecological laparoscopic surgery. It will also assess the safety profile of Oliceridine. The trial seeks to address the following key questions:

Can Oliceridine reduce the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in gynecological laparoscopic surgery? Does the incidence of PONV differ between patients receiving Oliceridine and those receiving the commonly used analgesic sufentanil in gynecological laparoscopic surgery? Are there any opioid-related adverse reactions in gynecological laparoscopic surgery patients using Oliceridine?

Participants will:

Receive Oliceridine or sufentanil for anesthesia induction, maintenance, and postoperative pain management.

Vital signs during surgery and the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting will be recorded.

Be followed up for at least 48 hours.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study Design:

This randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled trial compares oliceridine versus sufentanil for anesthesia/analgesia in gynecologic laparoscopy at Second Xiangya Hospital. The study features:

1. Randomization: Computer-generated 1:1 allocation via sealed envelopes
2. Blinding: Triple-blinding (participants, clinicians, outcome assessors) maintained through: Identical drug preparations (volume/appearance-matched);Separation between anesthesia nurses preparing drugs and clinical/research teams
3. Control: Active comparator (sufentanil) reflecting current standard practice.

Technical Methodology:

1. Anesthesia Protocol: Standardized induction with midazolam (0.05-0.10 mg/kg), study drug (sufentanil 0.3 μg/kg vs oliceridine 0.06 mg/kg), propofol (1.5-2.0 mg/kg), and cisatracurium (0.2-0.3 mg/kg). Maintenance via TIVA: propofol (4-10 mg/kg/h) + remifentanil (0.1-0.2 μg/kg/min). Pre-incision/closure boluses: Study drug dosed per group (sufentanil 0.1-0.2 μg/kg vs oliceridine 0.02-0.04 mg/kg).
2. Analgesia Management: PCA pump configuration: Sufentanil group: 2 μg/kg in 100 mL NS; Oliceridine group: 0.4 mg/kg in 100 mL NS; Fixed adjuncts: ondansetron 8 mg + dexamethasone 10 mg.Demand dose: 2 mL (lockout 10 min), max 10 mL/h.
3. Rescue Protocols: Analgesia: Sufentanil 5 μg or oliceridine 0.2 mg IV PRN; PONV: Ondansetron 4 mg + dexamethasone 5 mg; haloperidol 1 mg if refractory.

Quality Assurance Measures:

Anesthesia depth monitoring: BIS-guided propofol titration; Hemodynamic stability: Protocolized management of hypotension (defined as MAP \<65 mmHg); Data validation: 10% random audit of time-stamped outcomes (PACU discharge, bowel recovery).

Pharmacokinetic Considerations:

Oliceridine dosing based on morphine equivalence (1mg ≈ 5mg morphine); Adjusted intraoperative dosing to account for context-sensitive half-time differences vs sufentanil.

Statistical Approach: Sample size:

Powered for PONV incidence difference (α=0.05, β=0.2); Analysis: ITT principle with sensitivity analysis for protocol deviations; Covariate adjustment: Stratification by Apfel risk factors (female sex, non-smoking, PONV history, opioid use).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) Laparoscopy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Oliceridine group

Anesthesia and analgesia with Oliceridine

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Oliceridine

Intervention Type DRUG

For gynecological laparoscopic surgery, general anesthesia was induced with Oliceridine at a dose of 0.06 mg/kg (Yichang Renfu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., China). Intraoperative analgesia was administered with a total dose of Oliceridine ranging from 0.1 to 0.15 mg/kg. Postoperatively, Oliceridine was administered through a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) system.

Sufentanil group

Anesthesia and analgesia with sufentanil

Group Type OTHER

Sufentanil

Intervention Type DRUG

For gynecological laparoscopic surgery, general anesthesia was induced with Sufentanil at a dose of 0.3 µg/kg (Yichang Renfu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., China). Intraoperative analgesia was provided with a total dose of Oliceridine ranging from 0.5 to 0.8 µg/kg. Postoperatively, Sufentanil was administered through a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) system.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Oliceridine

For gynecological laparoscopic surgery, general anesthesia was induced with Oliceridine at a dose of 0.06 mg/kg (Yichang Renfu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., China). Intraoperative analgesia was administered with a total dose of Oliceridine ranging from 0.1 to 0.15 mg/kg. Postoperatively, Oliceridine was administered through a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) system.

Intervention Type DRUG

Sufentanil

For gynecological laparoscopic surgery, general anesthesia was induced with Sufentanil at a dose of 0.3 µg/kg (Yichang Renfu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., China). Intraoperative analgesia was provided with a total dose of Oliceridine ranging from 0.5 to 0.8 µg/kg. Postoperatively, Sufentanil was administered through a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) system.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

TRV130 olinvyk

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery;
2. Age 18-65 years;
3. ASA physical status I-III;
4. Body mass index (BMI) 18-30 kg/m².

Exclusion Criteria

1. Severe dysfunction of major organs such as the heart, lungs, or brain;
2. History of allergy to opioid drugs, propofol, soybeans, or eggs;
3. Recent use of sedatives, analgesics, or monoamine oxidase inhibitors;
4. History of alcohol abuse;
5. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome;
6. Difficult airway;
7. Psychiatric or neurological disorders; communication disorders;
8. Women who are lactating or pregnant.

Withdrawal criteria:

1. Subject requests withdrawal or withdraws voluntarily;
2. Change in surgical method requiring combined gastrointestinal surgery;
3. Occurrence of allergy to the investigational drug or life-threatening complications;
4. Reoperation within 48 hours postoperatively due to bleeding or other factors.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

YanYing Xiao

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

YanYing Xiao

Associate Professor of the Department of Anesthesiology, the Second Xiangya Hospital, Central south University

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Xiao

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University

Changsha, Hunan, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Yanying Xiao, Doctor

Role: CONTACT

+8613467609491

Yaping WANG, Doctor

Role: CONTACT

+8613607314476

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Yibo Hu

Role: primary

+860731-85292476

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

LYEC2024-0425

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.