Invasive Brain-Computer Interfaces for Attention

NCT ID: NCT06940089

Last Updated: 2025-04-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-05-01

Study Completion Date

2026-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this interventional study is to compare if the use of a brain-machine interface (BCI) therapy can improve the symptoms of attentional deficit by producing brain changes in the networks that modulate attention. The investigators intend to work with epileptic participants who do not respond to pharmacological treatment, who will undergo neurosurgery. The questions the study sets out to answer are:

1. is there an improvement of symptoms in an experimental group receiving the treatment versus a sham group receiving a simulation of the treatment?
2. does the application of the therapy before surgery reduce the recovery times of post-surgery cognitive deficits described in the literature?

Making use of the information recorded from brain electrodes implanted before a participant's epilepsy surgery, the investigators will create a BCI decoder that works with the available activity sources to establish the level of attention of each participant when performing tasks. Participants:

* will perform an offline phase first, which will consist of one day of evaluation, in which they will be familiarized with an attentional task.
* will perform a training phase later, which will consist of several days of evaluation, where they will learn to modulate their level of attention. This modulation will be facilitated by the BCI decoder, which will classify the level of attention directly from the brain and provide visual feedback that the participant will use as a guide.

If the participant is part of the experimental group (or BCI group), the feedback will work as described and should be easy to follow, but if the participant is part of the Sham group, the feedback will not work according to the brain activity of the actual participant, but according to that of another person. Because of this, a mismatch will be created between the moments a brain experiences inattention, and participants believe they are experiencing inattention.

This is a randomized, double-blind study, in which the experimenters will evaluate how the effect of the attentional therapy with BCI affects an BCI group and a Sham group.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This research differs from others available in that it is among the first of its kind to be performed on participants with invasive electrodes in a hospital setting. Additionally, it focuses on epileptic participants, who already have a set of invasive electrodes in place, so there is no need for any additional surgical intervention.

Also, the age range of participants for the study (between 8 and 21 years old) usually presents a high incidence of attentional disorders, so it is considered a good group to carry out this research.

This research does not require any additional intervention of any kind, except for the participant willingness to participate, with the possibility of improving their baseline attentional level, or at least of recovering their baseline attentional level faster after surgery, which usually decreases it.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Epilepsy in Children Epilepsy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The study has two groups (BCI and Sham) running in parallel without crossover. The first arm receives the active BCI intervention using the IDE device, while the second arm also use the IDE device but receive a sham condition (not the active BCI intervention).
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

This arm will receive visual feedback controlled by its own BCI

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Attention Intervention using a customized BCI decoder

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

During the offline phase of the intervention, participants will perform an attentional task while intracranial brain activity is recorded. Data from this session will be used to train a personalized decoder capable of classifying attentional engagement.

During the training phase, participants will receive real-time visual feedback contingent on their brain activity when attentional engagement is detected. This closed-loop feedback aims to reinforce successful attention and enhance performance over repeated sessions.

This arm will receive visual feedback from another randomly selected participant

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Attention Intervention without using a customized BCI decoder

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

During the offline phase, participants will perform an attentional task while intracranial brain activity is recorded. A personalized decoder will be created for each participant but will not be used during the training phase sessions.

During the training phase, participants will receive visual feedback while performing attentional tasks; however, the feedback will not be contingent on their brain activity. Instead, feedback will be non-contingent and unrelated to actual attentional engagement. This group is not expected to experience improvements in attentional performance through the training sessions.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Attention Intervention using a customized BCI decoder

During the offline phase of the intervention, participants will perform an attentional task while intracranial brain activity is recorded. Data from this session will be used to train a personalized decoder capable of classifying attentional engagement.

During the training phase, participants will receive real-time visual feedback contingent on their brain activity when attentional engagement is detected. This closed-loop feedback aims to reinforce successful attention and enhance performance over repeated sessions.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Attention Intervention without using a customized BCI decoder

During the offline phase, participants will perform an attentional task while intracranial brain activity is recorded. A personalized decoder will be created for each participant but will not be used during the training phase sessions.

During the training phase, participants will receive visual feedback while performing attentional tasks; however, the feedback will not be contingent on their brain activity. Instead, feedback will be non-contingent and unrelated to actual attentional engagement. This group is not expected to experience improvements in attentional performance through the training sessions.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children and adolescents (8-21 years)
* Confirmed diagnosis of drug-refractory epilepsy
* iEEG implants on the GK network (ventro-lateral prefrontal cortex and executive network). Also desirable in areas related with attention and Action Phase processing
* Normal to corrected vision
* Ability to understand instructions to follow protocols
* Able to read and understand English or Spanish (all evaluations will be conducted depending on the mother tongue of the participant)
* Able to assent together with his/her legal guardian (below 18 years old) or approve (18 years old or older) informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior history of seizure focus removal
* Prior history of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
* Prior history of traumatic brain injury
* Prior history of color blindness
* Intracranial implants
* Headaches disorders
* Neurological infections
* Neurological pain or malnutrition disorders
* Severe mental disorders: depression, anxiety, among other psychiatric diseases
* Severe intellectual and learning disabilities
* Compromised consciousness
* Severe physical impairment (i.e. inability to mobilize upper extremities by oneself)
* Severe co-morbidities (active cancer within 5 years, cardiovascular diseases, severe metabolic diseases, hepatic or kidney failure, recent major surgery, infectious diseases)
* Substance or alcohol abuse
* Pregnancy
* Criteria identified in safety guidelines for MRI, in particular metallic implants. Participants who are unable to perform MRI will be completely excluded from the study
Minimum Eligible Age

8 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Texas at Austin

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jose del R. Millan

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Diego Mac-Auliffe, Postdoc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The University of Texas at Austin

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dell Children's Medical Center

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jose Millan, Professor

Role: CONTACT

512-232-8111

Liberty Hamilton, Professor

Role: CONTACT

512-471-1929

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Elizabeth Tyler-Kabara, Professor

Role: primary

412-901-4291

Liberty Hamilton, Professor

Role: backup

512-471-1929

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ossandon T, Vidal JR, Ciumas C, Jerbi K, Hamame CM, Dalal SS, Bertrand O, Minotti L, Kahane P, Lachaux JP. Efficient "pop-out" visual search elicits sustained broadband gamma activity in the dorsal attention network. J Neurosci. 2012 Mar 7;32(10):3414-21. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6048-11.2012.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22399764 (View on PubMed)

Ezzyat Y, Wanda PA, Levy DF, Kadel A, Aka A, Pedisich I, Sperling MR, Sharan AD, Lega BC, Burks A, Gross RE, Inman CS, Jobst BC, Gorenstein MA, Davis KA, Worrell GA, Kucewicz MT, Stein JM, Gorniak R, Das SR, Rizzuto DS, Kahana MJ. Closed-loop stimulation of temporal cortex rescues functional networks and improves memory. Nat Commun. 2018 Feb 6;9(1):365. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02753-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29410414 (View on PubMed)

Reilly C, Atkinson P, Das KB, Chin RF, Aylett SE, Burch V, Gillberg C, Scott RC, Neville BG. Neurobehavioral comorbidities in children with active epilepsy: a population-based study. Pediatrics. 2014 Jun;133(6):e1586-93. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3787.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24864167 (View on PubMed)

Perrone-Bertolotti M, El Bouzaidi Tiali S, Vidal JR, Petton M, Croize AC, Deman P, Rheims S, Minotti L, Bhattacharjee M, Baciu M, Kahane P, Lachaux JP. A real-time marker of object-based attention in the human brain. A possible component of a "gate-keeping mechanism" performing late attentional selection in the Ventro-Lateral Prefrontal Cortex. Neuroimage. 2020 Apr 15;210:116574. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116574. Epub 2020 Jan 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31981780 (View on PubMed)

Mac-Auliffe D, Chatard B, Petton M, Croize AC, Sipp F, Bontemps B, Gannerie A, Bertrand O, Rheims S, Kahane P, Lachaux JP. The Dual-Task Cost Is Due to Neural Interferences Disrupting the Optimal Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of the Competing Tasks. Front Behav Neurosci. 2021 Aug 19;15:640178. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.640178. eCollection 2021.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34489652 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STUDY00003744

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Neural Computations of Goal-directed Decision-making
NCT06489561 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA