Early Neuromodulation in Traumatic Brain Injury

NCT ID: NCT06871124

Last Updated: 2025-05-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-06-16

Study Completion Date

2027-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The two goals of the proposed study are: (1) To determine how brain activity changes with cognitive recovery over time from acute to chronic phases of traumatic brain injury (TBI). (2) To determine how the time of anodal transcranial electrical stimulation (A-tES) administration affects cognitive performance and brain activity in TBI.

To achieve these study goals, the investigators will conduct a pilot clinical trial over three years in which the investigators aim to recruit 60 patients with moderate to severe TBI at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center (UCMC). During the acute phase of TBI, all participants will complete clinical questionnaires and perform 2 cognitive computer tasks while their brain activity is recorded. Half of the participants will be randomly selected to receive A-tES for 15 minutes while performing cognitive tasks and the other half will receive sham stimulation. All participants will be followed for 6 months. During their 3-month follow-up, the investigators will perform another session where all participants complete the questionnaires and receive A-tES while performing cognitive tasks during brain recording. In their last visit at 6 months post-injury, all participants will complete the questionnaires and cognitive tasks with brain recording but no stimulation treatment. From the collected data, the investigators will determine if time from brain injury correlates with brain activity during performance of cognitive tasks. The investigators will also assess the efficacy of early A-tES treatment for improving cognitive task performance and clinical test ratings at 6 months post-injury in comparison to A-tES delivered during the 3-month follow-up visit.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is a medical and surgical epidemic affecting at least 1.7 million individuals yearly in the United States. Functional outcomes after TBI can show improvement or deterioration up to two decades after injury, and rates of all-cause mortality remain elevated for many years. Cognitive impairments are among the most disabling of post-TBI symptoms and typically contribute more to persisting disability than physical impairment. Following TBI, deficits are consistently demonstrated in the domains of attention, working memory and executive functioning. To date, there are some potential interventions for motor/functional recovery but there is no treatment for cognitive dysfunction which is more disabling. Although brain stimulation techniques appear promising as treatments to improve neuropsychiatric conditions and functional deficits, most noninvasive brain stimu¬lation interventions have been nontargeted and focused on the chronic phase of recovery after TBI. In the acute stages, there is limited available evidence of the efficacy and safety of brain stimulation to improve outcomes. The stimulation during chronic phase is applied either in isolation or before cognitive training. TBI thus underscores a major unaddressed challenge: the lack of time sensitive cognitive rehabilitation therapy post injury. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop rehabilitation paradigms in the early phases of injury for cognitive recovery and prevention of long-term cognitive impairments.

Hypothesis/Objective(s): This study is based on the hypothesis that early intervention with anodal transcranial electrical stimulation (A-tES) during the acute and sub-acute phases of TBI will enhance cognitive recovery over a similar intervention used only in the sub-acute phase. The objective of this study is to determine neural biomarkers of cognitive functional recovery in TBI and to investigate the neuromodulatory effects of early A-tES on cognitive functions in the sub-acute/chronic phases of TBI.

Specific Aims: (1) To determine neural correlates of cognitive recovery from injury over the acute to sub-acute/chronic phase in TBI, (2) To determine effects of time from injury when A-tES was administered on cognitive performance and associated EEG rhythms in TBI.

Study Design: The investigators will conduct a pilot clinical trial over a 3-year period in which we aim to recruit 60 patients with moderate to severe isolated TBI at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center (UCMC). All recruited participants will be administered a Brief test of adult cognition (BTACT) at bedside during the acute phase. They will perform 2 cognitive tasks on a laptop computer while their EEGs are being recorded. 50% of recruited patients selected randomly during the acute phase will receive active A-tES to their left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) for 15 minutes each during the performance of cognitive tasks while the rest will receive sham stimulation. All participants will be followed for 6 months. When they return for their typical 3-month follow-up, we will perform another session with BTACT, EEG and cognitive tasks. During this visit all participants will receive active A-tES to their left dlPFC while performing cognitive tasks. In their last visit at 6 months post injury, all participants will be administered BTACT and cognitive tasks with EEG recordings but no intervention. They will also complete a quality of life (QOL) questionnaire designed through involvement of CBPR during their follow-up visits. For Aim 1, the investigators will determine if there are significant temporal correlations between neural oscillations recorded via EEG during the performance of cognitive tasks and injury phase. For Aim 2, the investigators will use a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled, parallel study design to assess effects of early A-tES on improving performance on computer tasks, clinical test ratings and QOL measures during the 6-month post injury follow-up compared to A-tES delivered during the 3-month follow up visit.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Patients

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Early intervention

Patients assigned to this arm will receive anodal transcranial electrical stimulation (A-tES) within a 1-2 weeks of their injury and another session of tES at a 3 month follow up visit.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

transcranial electrical stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Anodal transcranial electrical stimulation (A-tES) is a widely used and well tolerated non-invasive electrical stimulation paradigm that promotes adaptive neuroplasticity and may prevent or reduce pathological sequela following brain injury. It has been used in a wide variety of neurologic and psychiatric disorders for cognitive and motor rehabilitation.

Sham

Patients assigned to this arm will receive sham transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) within a 1-2 weeks of their injury and another session of tES at a 3 month follow up visit.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham Comparator

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham comparator consist of A-tES in the beginning and end of stimulation block but no stimulation during the actual stimulation period.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

transcranial electrical stimulation

Anodal transcranial electrical stimulation (A-tES) is a widely used and well tolerated non-invasive electrical stimulation paradigm that promotes adaptive neuroplasticity and may prevent or reduce pathological sequela following brain injury. It has been used in a wide variety of neurologic and psychiatric disorders for cognitive and motor rehabilitation.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham Comparator

Sham comparator consist of A-tES in the beginning and end of stimulation block but no stimulation during the actual stimulation period.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Moderate to severe TBI: Glasgow Coma Scale (GSC) in the 3-12 range and greater than 30 min of loss of consciousness and/or a post-traumatic amnesia that lasts more than 24 hours and/or an alteration of mental state over 24 hours,
2. age 18-80 years,
3. Isolated TBI,
4. Intelligible speech and Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test (GOAT) score \>70 at time of enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Persistent bilateral non-reactive pupils or other evidence of non-survivable injury,
2. Decompressive craniectomy to treat refractory ICP subsequent to diffuse injury, (3) Co-enrollment in another therapeutic TBI trial,

(4) Pregnancy, (5) Patients with polytrauma (6) Patients with clinical seizures or status epilepticus.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Cincinnati

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ishita Basu

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Cincinnati

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ishita Basu, PhD

Role: CONTACT

5135583991

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ishita Basu

Role: primary

2178199493

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TP230311

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

TP230311

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.