Causal Role of Top-Down Theta Oscillations in Prioritization

NCT ID: NCT06252532

Last Updated: 2025-01-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-07-01

Study Completion Date

2026-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Purpose: The purpose of this pilot study is to investigate the dynamics between theta and alpha oscillations in the control of working memory. These findings will be informative of what types of brain stimulation are most effective at modulating brain activity. Deep brain stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation are used for an increasing number of neurological and psychiatric disorders. Participants: Eligible participants are patients who have previously had electrodes implanted to monitor epilepsy (outside of research activity). 50 participants will be recruited, 25 participants for each phase of the study. Procedures (methods): The participants will perform a cognitive control task. During the task, rhythmic trains of direct cortical stimulation will be delivered to the frontal cortex alone or to the frontal and parietal cortex. Electrocorticography will be collected concurrent with stimulation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of this study is to investigate the causal role of functional interactions between frontal-theta dependent selection processes and posterior-alpha dependent suppression processes in the context of cognitive control by targeting theta and alpha oscillations in frontal and parietal cortex separately in phase one of the experiment. Theta and alpha oscillations are hypothesized to play complementary roles such that theta oscillations are excitatory (related to active processing) whereas alpha oscillations are inhibitory (related to suppression of processing).

Thus, the investigators hypothesize that rhythmic brain stimulation can be used to drive activity in opposite directions. In the second phase of the experiment the investigators target functional connectivity between these regions. In particular, theta oscillations are hypothesized to play a critical role in orchestrating the prioritization and suppression of information across the cerebral cortex. Thus, the investigators hypothesize that in-phase theta frequency connectivity will be causally related to working memory success, but alpha frequency connectivity will be inconsequential and anti-phase theta connectivity will be detrimental. Together these findings suggest an overall model by which the amplitude of theta oscillations in prefrontal and the amplitude of alpha oscillations in parietal play a causal role in prioritization and suppression respectively, but functional connectivity between frontal and parietal cortex within the theta frequency band alone is critical to these cognitive processes. This experiment is of critical importance to the design of future interventions that use brain stimulation for the treatment of psychiatric and neurological disorders. For example, the use of frequency specific brain stimulation is key to controlling the impact of brain stimulation on neural activity. Design considerations like this one might be fundamental to improving the efficacy of future interventions such as the use of deep brain stimulation for the treatment of Parkinson's disease and for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of major depressive disorder.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Working Memory Epilepsy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Frontal Stimulation

Direct Cortical Stimulation (DCS) in alpha and theta frequencies is applied through electrodes located in the frontal cortex.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Direct cortical stimulation (DCS) Alpha

Intervention Type DEVICE

Rhythmic alpha stimulation

Direct cortical stimulation (DCS) Theta

Intervention Type DEVICE

Rhythmic theta stimulation applied

Sham Direct cortical stimulation (DCS)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Arrhythmic stimulation paradigm applied

Frontal Parietal Stimulation

Direct Cortical Stimulation (DCS) in in-phase and anti-phase theta frequencies is applied through electrodes located in the frontal and parietal cortex.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham Direct cortical stimulation (DCS)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Arrhythmic stimulation paradigm applied

Direct cortical stimulation (DCS) In-Phase Theta

Intervention Type DEVICE

Rhythmic in-phase theta stimulation applied

Direct cortical stimulation (DCS) Anti-Phase Theta

Intervention Type DEVICE

Rhythmic anti-phase theta stimulation applied

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Direct cortical stimulation (DCS) Alpha

Rhythmic alpha stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Direct cortical stimulation (DCS) Theta

Rhythmic theta stimulation applied

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham Direct cortical stimulation (DCS)

Arrhythmic stimulation paradigm applied

Intervention Type DEVICE

Direct cortical stimulation (DCS) In-Phase Theta

Rhythmic in-phase theta stimulation applied

Intervention Type DEVICE

Direct cortical stimulation (DCS) Anti-Phase Theta

Rhythmic anti-phase theta stimulation applied

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

CereStim M96 CereStim M96 CereStim M96 CereStim M96 CereStim M96

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Able to provide informed consent
* History of medically intractable epilepsy
* Speak and understand English
* For the stimulation session, the participant must have electrodes in the relevant locations

Exclusion Criteria

* Current diagnosis of other neurological illnesses including ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, brain neoplasm
* Major systemic illness
* Severe cognitive impairment - diagnosed by clinician in neuropsychiatric evaluation
* Severe psychiatric illness
* Excessive use of alcohol or other substances
* Anything that, in the opinion of the investigator, would place the participant at increased risk or preclude the participant's full compliance with or completion of the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Flavio Frohlich, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UNC Chapel Hill

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Alagapan S, Riddle J, Huang WA, Hadar E, Shin HW, Frohlich F. Network-Targeted, Multi-site Direct Cortical Stimulation Enhances Working Memory by Modulating Phase Lag of Low-Frequency Oscillations. Cell Rep. 2019 Nov 26;29(9):2590-2598.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.10.072.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31775030 (View on PubMed)

Alagapan S, Lustenberger C, Hadar E, Shin HW, FrÓ§hlich F. Low-frequency direct cortical stimulation of left superior frontal gyrus enhances working memory performance. Neuroimage. 2019 Jan 1;184:697-706. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.064. Epub 2018 Sep 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30268847 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

5R01MH124387

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

23-1652

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation
NCT04318522 UNKNOWN NA