B-TURP vs BipolEP in Management of BPH Patients With Medium-sized Prostates
NCT ID: NCT06939062
Last Updated: 2025-07-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
63 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-07-01
2025-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Bipolar Resection vs Enucleation of Prostate
NCT06983444
Bipolar TURP Versus Bipolar Enucleation for BPH Management
NCT06758466
Bipolar Transurethral Enucleation (BipolEP) vs Bipolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate
NCT03503721
Bipolar Needlescopic Enucleation Versus Vapoenucleation of BPH
NCT04331301
Real-Time (TRUS) Guidance in Endoscopic Treatment of BPH
NCT06922968
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Approximately 20% of men with BPH will eventually require surgical intervention. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remains the gold-standard surgical treatment, offering both immediate relief of intravesical obstruction and durable improvement in voiding parameters and symptoms. However, the procedure carries significant risks, including perioperative bleeding and transurethral resection syndrome (TUR syndrome), with complication rates increasing proportionally to prostate size.
The recent technological advancements in urological equipment have led to increased adoption of bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP) for BPH management. This technique employs a plasma kinetic system that provides superior coagulation capabilities. A significant advantage of B-TURP is its use of normal saline irrigation, which substantially reduces the risk of TUR syndrome compared to conventional methods. Clinical studies have demonstrated B-TURP's efficacy in relieving bladder outlet obstruction secondary to BPH, with outcomes comparable to traditional approaches.
Despite advancements in TURP technology, incidence of complications such as postoperative recurrence remained unchanged, necessitating surgical innovation. In this context, bipolar enucleation of the prostate (BipoLEP) has emerged as an alternative technique designed to address these challenges. Our study was designed to conduct a comparative analysis of BipoLEP versus bipolar B-TURP in the treatment of medium-sized BPH patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Bipolar enucleation of the prostate (BipolEP) patients
Benign prostatic hyperplasia patients with medium -sized prostates who will undergo Bipolar enucleation of the prostate (BipolEP)
Bipolar enucleation of the prostate (BipolEP)
Endoscopic transurethral enucleation of the prostate using bipolar energy
Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP) patients
Benign prostatic hyperplasia patients with medium -sized prostates who will undergo Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP)
Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP)
Endoscopic transurethral resection of the prostate using bipolar energy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bipolar enucleation of the prostate (BipolEP)
Endoscopic transurethral enucleation of the prostate using bipolar energy
Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP)
Endoscopic transurethral resection of the prostate using bipolar energy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Prostate volume between 40-80 cc as determined by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS).
* Failure of medical management.
* Written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous prostate/urethral surgery.
* Neurogenic bladder or urethral strictures.
* Significant coagulopathy.
* Uncontrolled urinary tract infection.
* Patient on anticoagulant medication.
45 Years
80 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mostafa Mohamed Atef Abdelaziz Mostafa
Lecturer of Urology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Assiut University Urology Hospital
Asyut, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Chen S, Zhu L, Cai J, Zheng Z, Ge R, Wu M, Deng Z, Zhou H, Yang S, Wu W, Liao L, Tan J. Plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate compared with open prostatectomy for prostates larger than 100 grams: a randomized noninferiority controlled trial with long-term results at 6 years. Eur Urol. 2014 Aug;66(2):284-91. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.010. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
Bhansali M, Patankar S, Dobhada S, Khaladkar S. Management of large (>60 g) prostate gland: PlasmaKinetic Superpulse (bipolar) versus conventional (monopolar) transurethral resection of the prostate. J Endourol. 2009 Jan;23(1):141-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0005.
Ho HS, Yip SK, Lim KB, Fook S, Foo KT, Cheng CW. A prospective randomized study comparing monopolar and bipolar transurethral resection of prostate using transurethral resection in saline (TURIS) system. Eur Urol. 2007 Aug;52(2):517-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.03.038. Epub 2007 Mar 28.
Singh H, Desai MR, Shrivastav P, Vani K. Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of prostate: randomized controlled study. J Endourol. 2005 Apr;19(3):333-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.333.
Ahyai SA, Gilling P, Kaplan SA, Kuntz RM, Madersbacher S, Montorsi F, Speakman MJ, Stief CG. Meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic enlargement. Eur Urol. 2010 Sep;58(3):384-97. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.06.005. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
Gratzke C, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A, Drake MJ, Madersbacher S, Mamoulakis C, Oelke M, Tikkinen KAO, Gravas S. EAU Guidelines on the Assessment of Non-neurogenic Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms including Benign Prostatic Obstruction. Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1099-1109. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.038. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
Kok ET, Schouten BW, Bohnen AM, Groeneveld FP, Thomas S, Bosch JL. Risk factors for lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia in a community based population of healthy aging men: the Krimpen Study. J Urol. 2009 Feb;181(2):710-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.025. Epub 2008 Dec 16.
GBD 2019 Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Collaborators. The global, regional, and national burden of benign prostatic hyperplasia in 204 countries and territories from 2000 to 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2022 Nov;3(11):e754-e776. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00213-6. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
B-TURP vs BipolEP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.