B-TURP vs BipolEP in Management of BPH Patients With Medium-sized Prostates

NCT ID: NCT06939062

Last Updated: 2025-07-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

63 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-07-01

Study Completion Date

2025-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a comparative study of the efficacy and safety of endoscopic bipolar transurethral resection and enucleation of the prostate in management of benign prostatic hyperplasia patients with medium-sized prostates

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a highly prevalent condition among aging males, with incidence rates escalating progressively with age. Epidemiological data indicate that approximately 8% of men in their fourth decade are affected, a proportion that rises to 50% by the sixth decade and exceeds 80% in individuals reaching their ninth decade. BPH may induce bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), leading to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). LUTS are one of the most frequent urological complaints in aging males. LUTS are typically categorized into obstructive and storage subtypes, with clinical BPH representing the predominant underlying etiology.

Approximately 20% of men with BPH will eventually require surgical intervention. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remains the gold-standard surgical treatment, offering both immediate relief of intravesical obstruction and durable improvement in voiding parameters and symptoms. However, the procedure carries significant risks, including perioperative bleeding and transurethral resection syndrome (TUR syndrome), with complication rates increasing proportionally to prostate size.

The recent technological advancements in urological equipment have led to increased adoption of bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP) for BPH management. This technique employs a plasma kinetic system that provides superior coagulation capabilities. A significant advantage of B-TURP is its use of normal saline irrigation, which substantially reduces the risk of TUR syndrome compared to conventional methods. Clinical studies have demonstrated B-TURP's efficacy in relieving bladder outlet obstruction secondary to BPH, with outcomes comparable to traditional approaches.

Despite advancements in TURP technology, incidence of complications such as postoperative recurrence remained unchanged, necessitating surgical innovation. In this context, bipolar enucleation of the prostate (BipoLEP) has emerged as an alternative technique designed to address these challenges. Our study was designed to conduct a comparative analysis of BipoLEP versus bipolar B-TURP in the treatment of medium-sized BPH patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bipolar enucleation of the prostate (BipolEP) patients

Benign prostatic hyperplasia patients with medium -sized prostates who will undergo Bipolar enucleation of the prostate (BipolEP)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bipolar enucleation of the prostate (BipolEP)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endoscopic transurethral enucleation of the prostate using bipolar energy

Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP) patients

Benign prostatic hyperplasia patients with medium -sized prostates who will undergo Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endoscopic transurethral resection of the prostate using bipolar energy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bipolar enucleation of the prostate (BipolEP)

Endoscopic transurethral enucleation of the prostate using bipolar energy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP)

Endoscopic transurethral resection of the prostate using bipolar energy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male patients aged 45-80 years with symptomatic BPH (IPSS ≥8).
* Prostate volume between 40-80 cc as determined by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS).
* Failure of medical management.
* Written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Prostate cancer (suspected on PSA/DRE or confirmed by biopsy).
* Previous prostate/urethral surgery.
* Neurogenic bladder or urethral strictures.
* Significant coagulopathy.
* Uncontrolled urinary tract infection.
* Patient on anticoagulant medication.
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mostafa Mohamed Atef Abdelaziz Mostafa

Lecturer of Urology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Assiut University Urology Hospital

Asyut, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chen S, Zhu L, Cai J, Zheng Z, Ge R, Wu M, Deng Z, Zhou H, Yang S, Wu W, Liao L, Tan J. Plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate compared with open prostatectomy for prostates larger than 100 grams: a randomized noninferiority controlled trial with long-term results at 6 years. Eur Urol. 2014 Aug;66(2):284-91. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.010. Epub 2014 Jan 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24502959 (View on PubMed)

Bhansali M, Patankar S, Dobhada S, Khaladkar S. Management of large (>60 g) prostate gland: PlasmaKinetic Superpulse (bipolar) versus conventional (monopolar) transurethral resection of the prostate. J Endourol. 2009 Jan;23(1):141-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0005.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19178175 (View on PubMed)

Ho HS, Yip SK, Lim KB, Fook S, Foo KT, Cheng CW. A prospective randomized study comparing monopolar and bipolar transurethral resection of prostate using transurethral resection in saline (TURIS) system. Eur Urol. 2007 Aug;52(2):517-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.03.038. Epub 2007 Mar 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17416453 (View on PubMed)

Singh H, Desai MR, Shrivastav P, Vani K. Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of prostate: randomized controlled study. J Endourol. 2005 Apr;19(3):333-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.333.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15865523 (View on PubMed)

Ahyai SA, Gilling P, Kaplan SA, Kuntz RM, Madersbacher S, Montorsi F, Speakman MJ, Stief CG. Meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic enlargement. Eur Urol. 2010 Sep;58(3):384-97. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.06.005. Epub 2010 Jun 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20825758 (View on PubMed)

Gratzke C, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A, Drake MJ, Madersbacher S, Mamoulakis C, Oelke M, Tikkinen KAO, Gravas S. EAU Guidelines on the Assessment of Non-neurogenic Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms including Benign Prostatic Obstruction. Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1099-1109. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.038. Epub 2015 Jan 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25613154 (View on PubMed)

Kok ET, Schouten BW, Bohnen AM, Groeneveld FP, Thomas S, Bosch JL. Risk factors for lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia in a community based population of healthy aging men: the Krimpen Study. J Urol. 2009 Feb;181(2):710-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.025. Epub 2008 Dec 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19091352 (View on PubMed)

GBD 2019 Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Collaborators. The global, regional, and national burden of benign prostatic hyperplasia in 204 countries and territories from 2000 to 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2022 Nov;3(11):e754-e776. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00213-6. Epub 2022 Oct 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36273485 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

B-TURP vs BipolEP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.