Prostate Bipolar Enucleation and Resection Versus Open Prostatectomy
NCT ID: NCT05416606
Last Updated: 2022-06-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
64 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-10-01
2022-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Bipolar Resection vs Enucleation of Prostate
NCT06983444
Bipolar Needlescopic Enucleation Versus Vapoenucleation of BPH
NCT04331301
B-TURP vs BipolEP in Management of BPH Patients With Medium-sized Prostates
NCT06939062
Transurethral Resection Versus Transurethral Enucleation of the Prostate: Prospective Randomized Study
NCT05330156
KTP Green Light Prostatectomy Compared With Open Prostatectomy
NCT02072499
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This is a Comparative, Prospective Study conducted on men over 50 years.The patients were randomly distributed into two groups treated by TBERP and OP. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 1-week post catheter removal and 1-3-months postoperatively in terms of blood loss, operation time, the weight of resected prostatic tissues, post-operative catheterisation period, hospital stay, IPSS, PVR, prostate volume, early complications (recatheterization, urine retention, UTI and irritative symptoms) and late complications (urinary incontinence, urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
transurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostate
transurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostate
transurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostate
transurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostate
open prostatectomy
open surgical transvesical prostatectomy
open surgical transvesical prostatectomy
open surgical transvesical prostatectomy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
transurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostate
transurethral bipolar enucleation and resection of the prostate
open surgical transvesical prostatectomy
open surgical transvesical prostatectomy
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age more than 50 years
* Prostate size of more than 80 ml
* IPSS ≥ 8, and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) ≤ 15 mL/s
* Indications for surgery
* Refractory retention (failed ≥1 trial of voiding).
* Associated bladder Stones.
* Associated recurrent gross Hematuria.
* Associated with recurrent Infections.
* Associated renal insufficiency.
* Bother symptoms refractory to medical treatment.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient with active UTI.
* Prostate less than 80 ml.
* Severe associated comorbidities.
* Previous urethral, prostate, and bladder surgeries,
* Patients diagnosed with neurogenic bladder.
* Patients diagnosed with prostate cancer.
50 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Helwan University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mohamed Fawzy Hassan Mahdy Elsyaad
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tarek Salem, professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Helwan university faculty of medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Helwan university faculty of medicine
Helwan, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mahon JT, McVary KT. New Alternative Treatments for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Minimally Invasive Urology: Springer; 2020. p. 283-305.
Barry MJ, Fowler FJ Jr, O'leary MP, Bruskewitz RC, Holtgrewe HL, Mebust WK, Cockett AT; Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association. The American Urological Association Symptom Index for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. J Urol. 2017 Feb;197(2S):S189-S197. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.10.071. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
De Nunzio C, Lombardo R, Cicione AM, Tubaro A. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH). Urologic Principles and Practice: Springer; 2020. p. 341-55.
Foster HE, Barry MJ, Dahm P, Gandhi MC, Kaplan SA, Kohler TS, Lerner LB, Lightner DJ, Parsons JK, Roehrborn CG, Welliver C, Wilt TJ, McVary KT. Surgical Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Attributed to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: AUA Guideline. J Urol. 2018 Sep;200(3):612-619. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.05.048. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
Zheng X, Han X, Cao D, Wang Y, Xu H, Yang L, Wei Q, Ai J. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes between Button-Type Bipolar Plasma Vaporization and Transurethral Resection for the Prostate: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Med Sci. 2019 Oct 21;16(12):1564-1572. doi: 10.7150/ijms.38618. eCollection 2019.
Xie L, Mao Q, Chen H, Qin J, Zheng X, Lin Y, Wang X, Liu B. Transurethral vapor enucleation and resection of the prostate with plasma vaporization button electrode for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a feasibility study. J Endourol. 2012 Oct;26(10):1264-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0125. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
Sagen E, Namnuan RO, Hedelin H, Nelzen O, Peeker R. The morbidity associated with a TURP procedure in routine clinical practice, as graded by the modified Clavien-Dindo system. Scand J Urol. 2019 Aug;53(4):240-245. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2019.1623312. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
Morton S, McGuiness L, Harding C, Thorpe A. A review of surgery and new technology procedures for the management of benign prostatic obstruction. Journal of Clinical Urology. 2019;12(6):474-86.
Giulianelli R, Gentile BC, Mirabile G, Tema G, Albanesi L, Tariciotti P, Rizzo G, Falavolti C, Aloisi P, Vincenti G, Lombardo R. Bipolar plasma enucleation of the prostate vs. open prostatectomy in large benign prostatic hyperplasia: a single centre 3-year comparison. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019 Mar;22(1):110-116. doi: 10.1038/s41391-018-0080-7. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
Lokeshwar SD, Harper BT, Webb E, Jordan A, Dykes TA, Neal DE Jr, Terris MK, Klaassen Z. Epidemiology and treatment modalities for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Transl Androl Urol. 2019 Oct;8(5):529-539. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.10.01.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
51-2020
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.