Single Center Comparative Trial of Trans-Perineal Laser Ablation Vs Water Vapor Ablation

NCT ID: NCT06794333

Last Updated: 2025-01-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-08

Study Completion Date

2024-10-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary aim of this clinical trial is to determine whether one of the two methods under investigation, TPLA or WVA, is superior in the treatment of BPH. Additionally, as a secondary objective, the study seeks to evaluate the potential superiority of one method over the other concerning the sexual parameters of treated participants, assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF5) and the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire - Ejaculatory Dysfunction (MSHQ-EJ).

The researchers will compare the two methods under investigation (TPLA and WVA) to assess the potential superiority of one over the other.

Participants will:

* be randomized 1:1 between the two techniques and will undergo treatment at time 0;
* undergo follow-up including uroflowmetry and assessment of the International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), IIEF5, and MSHQ-EJ questionnaires at 3, 6, and 12 months.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Therapeutic options for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) encompass a wide range of both pharmacological and surgical approaches. BPH is an age-related condition that increasingly affects relatively younger individuals, starting from the age of 50.

Pharmacological therapy primarily involves medications that can alleviate symptoms but do not cure or lead to a regression of the prostate gland enlargement over time.

Surgical therapy aims to reduce the degree of obstruction, and in most cases, it can result in significant alterations in sexual function, such as inducing retrograde ejaculation or causing erectile dysfunction. These side effects are more common with the use of classical treatment methods, whose clinical value is widely recognized and confirmed by clinical evidence reported in international guidelines (EAU Guidelines, 2021 edition).

The classical surgical treatment methods include the removal of the adenoma (benign hyperplastic part of the prostate gland) through open surgery, transurethral resection (TURP), laser ablation with en bloc removal (holmium and thulium lasers), or direct cavitation (green light laser). These classical methods typically require hospital admission with a stay of three days or more, depending on the extent of postoperative bleeding and the risk of post-surgical obstructive complications (bladder clots).

On the other hand, some minimally invasive and innovative methods can reduce the symptoms caused by the disease while preserving the patient's sexual function. These techniques also allow for treatment without hospitalization or, at most, in a outpatients setting, utilizing local anesthesia or sedation and presenting a low risk of bleeding or other complications. Specifically, the minimally invasive technologies aim for thermal ablation of the hyperplastic tissue without cavitation. This approach results in longer healing times and clinical improvement, as they are dependent on cellular apoptosis, tissue necrosis, and spontaneous gland remodeling, which occur in the months following treatment, thus not producing immediate visible or effective results.

These methods include Rezum (WVA), I-Tind, and SoracteLite trans-perineal laser ablation (TPLA). All of these minimally invasive methods have been extensively validated by clinical studies and scientific evidence.

SoracteLite-TPLA increases the temperature of the treated tissue through the absorption of laser radiation delivered to the targeted tissue by very thin optical fibers inserted perineally. Exposure to high temperatures causes coagulative necrosis of the tissues. In contrast, WVA involves the transurethral injection of water vapor through a radiofrequency needle. The local temperature increase generated by radiofrequency and water vapor leads to progressive tissue necrosis, reducing the size of the prostate adenoma and significantly improving urinary flow.

It is also logical that the use of minimally invasive methods allows for treating a larger number of patients with a lower risk of complications, although with an apparently reduced effectiveness in deobstruction compared to classical methods. The economic and social advantages are further highlighted by the faster resolution of waiting lists and greater psychological acceptance by the patient, due to the preservation of certain sexual functions and the reduced personal burden associated with the complex system of hospitalization/anesthesia/surgery/outcomes.

The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of TPLA vs WVA treatment at 3, 6, and 12 months in patients with BPH in terms of improvement in uroflowmetry parameters and symptoms. Specifically, the uroflowmetry parameters analyzed include maximum flow (Qmax), average flow (Qmed), and post-void residual (PVR). For symptom assessment, the IPSS questionnaire will be used.

The secondary objective includes evaluating the impact of these methods on the sexual health of treated participants through the IIEF5 and MSHQ-EJ questionnaires, which will be administered at 3, 6, and 12 months.

All participants will therefore undergo follow-up at 3, 6, and 12 months, during which they will undergo uroflowmetry with recording of Qmax, Qmed, and PVR parameters, as well as administration of the IPSS, IIEF5, and MSHQ-EJ questionnaires. This is a single-center randomized clinical trial in which participants are randomized 1:1 into the two treatment arms by the researchers.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Transperineal Laser Ablation

Treatments are performed with the combined EchoLaser EVO system (Elesta SpA - Calenzano, FI). The EchoLaser EVO consists of the Echolaser X4, a multi-source laser system with a wavelength of 1064 nm, and the Echolaser Smart Interface (ESI).

The procedure are performed with the patient in the lithotomy position. Local anesthesia of the perineal region and periprostatic block with lidocaine is administered under ultrasound guidance. A catheter is placed during the irradiation to allow continuous irrigation of the urethra with saline solution, protecting the urethra from temperature rise. The Echolaser Smart Interface, defines: the number and positioning of fibers, the optimal dose, and the need for multiple pullbacks. 2 to 4 21G needles are inserted simultaneously (1 or 2 per lobe) in the peri-urethral area via transperineal ultrasound guidance. A 300-micron optical fiber will be placed in each needle. Each treatment delivers a maximum energy of 1800 J per fiber with a power of 3-5 W.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transperineal laser Ablation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Treatments are performed with the combined EchoLaser EVO system (Elesta SpA - Calenzano, FI). The EchoLaser EVO consists of the Echolaser X4, a multi-source laser system with a wavelength of 1064 nm, and the Echolaser Smart Interface (ESI). The procedure are performed with the patient in the lithotomy position. Local anesthesia of the perineal region and periprostatic block with lidocaine is administered under ultrasound guidance. A catheter is placed during the irradiation to allow continuous irrigation of the urethra with saline solution, protecting the urethra from temperature rise. The Echolaser Smart Interface, defines: the number and positioning of fibers, the optimal dose, and the need for multiple pullbacks. 2 to 4 21G needles are inserted simultaneously (1 or 2 per lobe) in the peri-urethral area via transperineal ultrasound guidance. A 300-micron optical fiber will be placed in each needle. Each treatment delivers a maximum energy of 1800 J per fiber with a power of 3-5 W.

Rezum Vapor Therapy

The treatment involves the insertion of a radiofrequency needle into the prostate tissue and the emission of water vapor.

Treatment under local anesthesia/sedation. Treatment planning using the REZUM device, with the number of injections proportional to the recommended therapeutic scheme based on prostate volume (1 injection every centimeter starting 1 cm below the bladder neck and 1 cm in front of the verumontanum).

Water vapor emission for 9-second intervals with a maximum of 9 applications per patient.

Three-way bladder catheter to decrease local temperature. The bladder catheter will be removed 15 days after patient discharge. Regarding the REZUM, it is a system that uses sterile single-use handpieces available within the company, where a special optics is inserted for direct visualization. The handpiece features a device that allows the manual insertion of a needle into the prostate, from which water vapor is emitted for the described treatment.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Rezum Vapor Therapy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The treatment involves the insertion of a radiofrequency needle into the prostate tissue and the emission of water vapor. Treatment under local anesthesia/sedation. Treatment planning using the REZUM device, with the number of injections proportional to the recommended therapeutic scheme based on prostate volume (1 injection every centimeter starting 1 cm below the bladder neck and 1 cm in front of the verumontanum). Water vapor emission for 9-second intervals with a maximum of 9 applications per patient. Three-way bladder catheter to decrease local temperature. The bladder catheter will be removed 15 days after patient discharge. Regarding the REZUM, it is a system that uses sterile single-use handpieces available within the company, where a special optics is inserted for direct visualization. The handpiece features a device that allows the manual insertion of a needle into the prostate, from which water vapor is emitted for the described treatment.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Transperineal laser Ablation

Treatments are performed with the combined EchoLaser EVO system (Elesta SpA - Calenzano, FI). The EchoLaser EVO consists of the Echolaser X4, a multi-source laser system with a wavelength of 1064 nm, and the Echolaser Smart Interface (ESI). The procedure are performed with the patient in the lithotomy position. Local anesthesia of the perineal region and periprostatic block with lidocaine is administered under ultrasound guidance. A catheter is placed during the irradiation to allow continuous irrigation of the urethra with saline solution, protecting the urethra from temperature rise. The Echolaser Smart Interface, defines: the number and positioning of fibers, the optimal dose, and the need for multiple pullbacks. 2 to 4 21G needles are inserted simultaneously (1 or 2 per lobe) in the peri-urethral area via transperineal ultrasound guidance. A 300-micron optical fiber will be placed in each needle. Each treatment delivers a maximum energy of 1800 J per fiber with a power of 3-5 W.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Rezum Vapor Therapy

The treatment involves the insertion of a radiofrequency needle into the prostate tissue and the emission of water vapor. Treatment under local anesthesia/sedation. Treatment planning using the REZUM device, with the number of injections proportional to the recommended therapeutic scheme based on prostate volume (1 injection every centimeter starting 1 cm below the bladder neck and 1 cm in front of the verumontanum). Water vapor emission for 9-second intervals with a maximum of 9 applications per patient. Three-way bladder catheter to decrease local temperature. The bladder catheter will be removed 15 days after patient discharge. Regarding the REZUM, it is a system that uses sterile single-use handpieces available within the company, where a special optics is inserted for direct visualization. The handpiece features a device that allows the manual insertion of a needle into the prostate, from which water vapor is emitted for the described treatment.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

EchoLaser EVO

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* PSA levels under 4 ng/ml (if PSA is over 4 ng/ml, a multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance will be performed; if a lesion with a PIRADS score over 2 is detected, a prostate biopsy will be conducted);
* Post void residual (PVR) over 50 ml;
* Maximum flow (Qmax) under 15 ml/s;
* IPSS score over 7;
* The possibility of undergoing transrectal ultrasound to assess the size of the prostate and prostate adenoma;
* Negative urinary culture.

Exclusion Criteria

* Diabetes;
* Overactive or Underachieve bladder;
* Contraindications for performing MRI or prostate biopsy in cases where PSA is over 4 ng/ml;
* Intolerance to transrectal ultrasound;
* Intolerance or allergy to local anesthetics.
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Pisa

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

ALESSANDRO ZUCCHI

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alessandro Zucchi, Professor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Pisa

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Pisa

Pisa, Pisa, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

van Riel LAMJG, van Kollenburg RAA, Vis AN, van Leeuwen PJ, de Reijke TM, de Bruin DM, Oddens JR. Safety and Feasibility of Soractelite Transperineal Focal Laser Ablation for Prostate Cancer and Short-term Quality of Life Analysis from a Multicenter Pilot Study. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Apr 2;39:48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.02.012. eCollection 2022 May.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35528781 (View on PubMed)

McVary KT, Roehrborn CG. Three-Year Outcomes of the Prospective, Randomized Controlled Rezum System Study: Convective Radiofrequency Thermal Therapy for Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Urology. 2018 Jan;111:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.10.023. Epub 2017 Nov 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29122620 (View on PubMed)

Patelli G, Ranieri A, Paganelli A, Mauri G, Pacella CM. Transperineal Laser Ablation for Percutaneous Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Feasibility Study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017 Sep;40(9):1440-1446. doi: 10.1007/s00270-017-1662-9. Epub 2017 May 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28474112 (View on PubMed)

Pacella CM, Patelli G, Iapicca G, Manenti G, Perretta T, Ryan CP, Esposito R, Mauri G. Transperineal laser ablation for percutaneous treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a feasibility study. Results at 6 and 12 months from a retrospective multi-centric study. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020 Jun;23(2):356-363. doi: 10.1038/s41391-019-0196-4. Epub 2019 Dec 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31827239 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PROGETTO SMART REGIONE TOSCANA

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

SPIT_2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Comparing Rezum and Urolift
NCT06820606 RECRUITING NA