OBServaToIre interNational Des Patients AnTiphospholipidEs traités Par Anticoagulants Oraux Directs

NCT ID: NCT06929182

Last Updated: 2025-04-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

500 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-07-01

Study Completion Date

2035-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This registry will make it possible to collect large-scale data on SAPL patients, particularly those treated with DOACs, in order to better assess the frequency of thrombotic and hemorrhagic events in this population of "non-high-risk" thrombotic SAPL patients treated with DOACs. The results will help refine treatment recommendations and could form the basis of future clinical trials.

In this study, there will be no modification of the usual care and no additional follow-up. Follow-up will be carried out during the patient's usual visits in the context of his or her pathology, the frequency of which will be left to the discretion of the usual physician. No additional consultations/hospitalizations/examinations will be carried out as part of the study. Data normally recorded in the medical record will be collected over a 5-year period, in line with standard patient follow-up.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are indicated as first-line therapy for the prevention of recurrence of venous thromboembolism. The management of APS patients is based on long-term anticoagulation, which the gold standard vitamin K antagonist (VKA) including warfarin. Managing VKA is sometimes a challenge in these patients due to their young age and prolonged treatment requiring regular monitoring of INR and numerous drug interactions. DOACs don't require biological monitoring so would represent a potential easier oral treatment for these APS patients.

In 2016, the first controlled randomized compared DOACs vs VKA in about fifty APS patients (RAPS study) using biological data (generation of thrombin). The safety profile (thrombotic recurrence / hemorrhage) seemed reassuring; However, the duration of follow-up and the number of included subjects were insufficient to conclude on clinical safety criteria.

Subsequently, case series have reported the use of DOACs in these patients. Thus, a meta-analysis on individual data covering all of the literature and including these case series was recently published: 447 APS patients treated with DOACs were included and for the first time, a rate of 16% recurrent thrombosis has been identified despite treatment. This recurrence rate is abnormally high compared to that with VKA. Some risk factors for recurrent thrombosis have been identified: the positivity of all antiphospholipid biological tests ("triple positivity"; OR = 4.3 \[95% CI; 2.3-7.7\]), and in patients treated with anti-Xa only (rivaroxaban or apixaban), a history of arterial thrombosis was associated with a higher risk of thrombotic recurrence (32% vs 14%, p = 0.006).

These results were confirmed by the TRAPS trial, which had to be prematurely stopped due to an excess of thrombotic events in the group of 59 "triple positive" APS patients treated with rivaroxaban (12% vs 0%) compared to the group treated with warfarin.

Thus, the use of DOACs does not appear to be risk free in all patients with APS, particularly those with "triple positivity" or those with a history of arterial thrombosis who represent a group of patients at "high risk" thrombosis.

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has diffused a letter recommending against the use of DOACs in patients with APS, especially triple-positive patients, and the use of VKAs has to be considered. It is important to emphasize that this modification does not constitute a contraindication to the use of DOACs but a recommendation.

For the other "non-high risk" APS patients who constitute the majority of APS patients, we have not strong arguments to justify a routine DOACs-VKA switch. Commonly in these patients, DOACs treatment was started in the acute phase of a thrombotic episode, before the diagnosis of APS was made. According to international recommendations, to conclude for an APS, it is necessary to control the aPL laboratory tests twice at least 3 months apart to conclude that there is persistent positivity. Thus the diagnosis of APS is often made several months after the thrombotic event and therefore several months after the introduction of anticoagulant treatment.

Taking into account the advantages on the quality of life of DOACs compared to VKAs, patients are often not in favor of modifying their anticoagulant treatment, especially if it has been started for many years with good tolerance. In addition, the switch from one well-balanced anticoagulant treatment to another is not without risk in terms of thrombosis or bleeding. It is for these reasons that a number of patients with APS remain on DOACs.

On the other hand, the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommends - in its recommendations for the APS management published on May 15, 2019 - to contraindicate the use of rivaroxaban in "high risk" APS patients but does not position itself in relation to the use of other DOACs or in "non-high risk" patients. In these patients, treatment could be continued and their follow-up would then become crucial to confirm that "non-high risk" patients are indeed at low risk of recurrent thrombosis.

For these "non-high risk" patients currently treated with DOACs, we do not currently have follow-up data on a sufficient group of patients. Therefore, it becomes urgent to collect in an exhaustive and prospective manner, all the data of "non-high risk" APS patients treated with DOACs and until then not monitored. The results will make it possible to better identify the target population that could benefit from this type of treatment. The results would also help prevent unnecessary VKA relays that carry their own risks.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) Thrombotic and Bleeding Events Safety

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Population of "non-high risk" thrombotic APS patients treated with DOAC

Non-high-risk" APS is defined by the absence of a history of arterial or microcirculatory thrombosis, the absence of valvulopathy related to APS, and a biological profile with only one or two positive antiphospholipid tests

"non-high risk" thrombotic APS patients treated with DOAC

Intervention Type OTHER

There is no specific intervention in this study. Routine care data will be collected from patients with a 'non-high-risk' APS profile who are currently being treated with DOACs or have been in the past.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

"non-high risk" thrombotic APS patients treated with DOAC

There is no specific intervention in this study. Routine care data will be collected from patients with a 'non-high-risk' APS profile who are currently being treated with DOACs or have been in the past.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Person having received complete information on the organization of the research and not having opposed the use of this data
* Male or female aged 18 and over;
* Carrier of a thrombotic APS according to the Sydney classification criteria, regardless of the length of time in the disease
* Having received a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) treatment which is currently discontinued.
* Or currently treated with DOAC

Exclusion Criteria

* Incomplete Sydney classification criteria
* Presence of a triple antiphospholipid positivity
* History of arterial thrombosis
* Persons referred to in Articles L. 1121-5, L. 1121-7 and L1121-8 of the French Public Health Code:

* Pregnant, parturient or nursing mother
* Minor person (not emancipated)
* Adult person subject to a legal protection measure (guardianship, curatorship, safeguard of justice)
* Person of full age unable to express consent
* Persons deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, persons undergoing psychiatric treatment under Articles L. 3212-1 and L. 3213-1 of the French Public Health Code.
* Signature of the research participation opposition form
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Central Hospital, Nancy, France

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Virginie Dufrost

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Virginie DUFROST, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHRU - Nancy

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Vall d´Hebron University Hospital

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jose Pardos-Gea, MD,PhD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pengo V, Denas G, Zoppellaro G, Jose SP, Hoxha A, Ruffatti A, Andreoli L, Tincani A, Cenci C, Prisco D, Fierro T, Gresele P, Cafolla A, De Micheli V, Ghirarduzzi A, Tosetto A, Falanga A, Martinelli I, Testa S, Barcellona D, Gerosa M, Banzato A. Rivaroxaban vs warfarin in high-risk patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. Blood. 2018 Sep 27;132(13):1365-1371. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-04-848333. Epub 2018 Jul 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30002145 (View on PubMed)

Dufrost V, Risse J, Reshetnyak T, Satybaldyeva M, Du Y, Yan XX, Salta S, Gerotziafas G, Jing ZC, Elalamy I, Wahl D, Zuily S. Increased risk of thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants. Results from an international patient-level data meta-analysis. Autoimmun Rev. 2018 Oct;17(10):1011-1021. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 Aug 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30103045 (View on PubMed)

Cohen H, Hunt BJ, Efthymiou M, Arachchillage DR, Mackie IJ, Clawson S, Sylvestre Y, Machin SJ, Bertolaccini ML, Ruiz-Castellano M, Muirhead N, Dore CJ, Khamashta M, Isenberg DA; RAPS trial investigators. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin to treat patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome, with or without systemic lupus erythematosus (RAPS): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 2/3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Haematol. 2016 Sep;3(9):e426-36. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(16)30079-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27570089 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2025PI048

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.