Short-Term Anticoagulation Versus Antiplatelet Therapy for Preventing Device Thrombosis Following Left Atrial Appendage Closure

NCT ID: NCT03568890

Last Updated: 2025-09-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

510 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-09-01

Study Completion Date

2030-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of the study is to compare short-term (8 weeks) anticoagulation therapy (DOAC) vs. antiplatelet therapy for the prevention of device thrombosis following transcatheter LAAC.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Transcatheter left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has emerged as an alternative to anticoagulation for preventing thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation. Whereas most complications associated with LAAC have decreased over time, the occurrence of device thrombosis remains a concern, with an incidence of 1 to 17%. Antithrombotic therapy for preventing device thrombosis following LAAC has evolved empirically, with antiplatelet therapy being the most commonly prescribed treatment. However, the rates of device thrombosis post-LAAC remain relatively high and have not decreased over time despite of increasing operator/center experience and the arrival of newer generation devices. This is of particular concern if we consider that LAAC is a preventive treatment. Experimental and mechanistic studies have suggested enhanced thrombin generation (and not platelet activation) within the days-weeks following the procedure as the most important mechanism involved in device thrombosis and appropriate short-term anticoagulation therapy with DOAC should translate into a significant reduction in the rate of device thrombosis post-LAAC.

Therefore, the objective of the study is to compare short-term (60 days) anticoagulation therapy (DOAC) vs. antiplatelet therapy for the prevention of device thrombosis following transcatheter LAAC.

It is estimated that 350 patients will take part in the study.

Update: A blinded interim analysis was performed with the analysis of clinical and TEE (central echo core lab) data from the initial 155 patients included in the study. Based on the results of the interim analysis, and considering the total number of events and the high rate (20%) of patients with either early cessation of the allocated treatment (before the 60-day TEE examination) or missing TEE at 60 days, it was decided to increase the sample size by 160 patients up to a total of 510 patients. This would ensure to include at least 350 patients with a TEE examination performed while receiving the allocated antithrombotic treatment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Left Atrial Appendage Closure Thrombosis Stroke TIA Bleeding

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Anticoagulation therapy

Direct oral anticoagulants (rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, or edoxaban; with dosage according to guideline recommendations) for 60 days.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, or edoxaban

Intervention Type DRUG

Duration of treatment: 60 days

Antiplatelet therapy

Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel -75 mg/day- and low dose aspirin -80 to 125 mg/day for 60 days.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Clopidogrel -75 mg/day

Intervention Type DRUG

Duration of treatment: 60 days

Low dose aspirin -80 to 125 mg/day-

Intervention Type DRUG

Duration of treatment: 60 days

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, or edoxaban

Duration of treatment: 60 days

Intervention Type DRUG

Clopidogrel -75 mg/day

Duration of treatment: 60 days

Intervention Type DRUG

Low dose aspirin -80 to 125 mg/day-

Duration of treatment: 60 days

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Successful transcatheter LAAC with any approved device
* Age≥18 years old

Exclusion Criteria

* Absolute contraindications for anticoagulation therapy
* Absolute contraindications for antiplatelet therapy
* End-stage renal disease (CrCl \<15 ml/min)
* Recent percutaneous revascularization with drug-eluting stents requiring dual antiplatelet therapy
* Prior intracranial hemorrhage
* Contraindications for TEE
* Severe pericardial effusion within the first 24 hrs following LAAC
* Major/life-threatening bleeding event within the month prior to LAAC
* Multiple bleeding events (minor or major) within the month prior to LAAC
* Major/life-threatening bleeding within the first 24 hrs following LAAC
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Josep Rodes-Cabau

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Josep Rodes-Cabau

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Asmarats L, Rodes-Cabau J. Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Current Devices and Clinical Outcomes. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov;10(11):e005359. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005359.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29146668 (View on PubMed)

Main ML, Fan D, Reddy VY, Holmes DR, Gordon NT, Coggins TR, House JA, Liao L, Rabineau D, Latus GG, Huber KC, Sievert H, Wright RF, Doshi SK, Douglas PS. Assessment of Device-Related Thrombus and Associated Clinical Outcomes With the WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (from the PROTECT-AF Trial). Am J Cardiol. 2016 Apr 1;117(7):1127-34. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.01.039. Epub 2016 Feb 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26993976 (View on PubMed)

Saw J, Tzikas A, Shakir S, Gafoor S, Omran H, Nielsen-Kudsk JE, Kefer J, Aminian A, Berti S, Santoro G, Nietlispach F, Moschovitis A, Cruz-Gonzalez I, Stammen F, Tichelbacker T, Freixa X, Ibrahim R, Schillinger W, Meier B, Sievert H, Gloekler S. Incidence and Clinical Impact of Device-Associated Thrombus and Peri-Device Leak Following Left Atrial Appendage Closure With the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Feb 27;10(4):391-399. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.11.029.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28231907 (View on PubMed)

Tzikas A, Shakir S, Gafoor S, Omran H, Berti S, Santoro G, Kefer J, Landmesser U, Nielsen-Kudsk JE, Cruz-Gonzalez I, Sievert H, Tichelbacker T, Kanagaratnam P, Nietlispach F, Aminian A, Kasch F, Freixa X, Danna P, Rezzaghi M, Vermeersch P, Stock F, Stolcova M, Costa M, Ibrahim R, Schillinger W, Meier B, Park JW. Left atrial appendage occlusion for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: multicentre experience with the AMPLATZER Cardiac Plug. EuroIntervention. 2016 Feb;11(10):1170-9. doi: 10.4244/EIJY15M01_06.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25604089 (View on PubMed)

Lempereur M, Aminian A, Freixa X, Gafoor S, Kefer J, Tzikas A, Legrand V, Saw J. Device-associated thrombus formation after left atrial appendage occlusion: A systematic review of events reported with the Watchman, the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug and the Amulet. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov 1;90(5):E111-E121. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26903. Epub 2017 Feb 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28145040 (View on PubMed)

Fauchier L, Cinaud A, Brigadeau F, Lepillier A, Pierre B, Abbey S, Fatemi M, Franceschi F, Guedeney P, Jacon P, Paziaud O, Venier S, Deharo JC, Gras D, Klug D, Mansourati J, Montalescot G, Piot O, Defaye P. Device-Related Thrombosis After Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion for Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Apr 10;71(14):1528-1536. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.01.076.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29622159 (View on PubMed)

O'Hara C, O'Hara GE, Jacques F, Champagne J, Lemyre M, Charbonneau L, O'Connor K, Bernier M, Beaudoin J, Rodes-Cabau J, Paradis JM. Run With the Hare and Hunt With the Hounds: Watchman Device Surgical Resection in the Setting of Recurrent Device Related Thrombi in a Patient With Bleeding Diathesis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Dec 12;9(23):e223-e225. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.09.041. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27931603 (View on PubMed)

Rodriguez-Gabella T, Nombela-Franco L, Regueiro A, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Champagne J, O'Hara G, Bernier M, Macaya C, Rodes-Cabau J. Single Antiplatelet Therapy Following Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Patients With Contraindication to Anticoagulation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Oct 25;68(17):1920-1921. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.08.016. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27765196 (View on PubMed)

Jalal Z, Dinet ML, Combes N, Pillois X, Renou P, Sibon I, Iriart X, Thambo JB. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure followed by single antiplatelet therapy: Short- and mid-term outcomes. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Apr;110(4):242-249. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2016.09.006. Epub 2017 Jan 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28065447 (View on PubMed)

Rodes-Cabau J, O'Hara G, Paradis JM, Bernier M, Rodriguez-Gabella T, Regueiro A, O'Connor K, Beaudoin J, Puri R, Cote M, Champagne J. Changes in Coagulation and Platelet Activation Markers Following Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure. Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jul 1;120(1):87-91. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.03.253. Epub 2017 Apr 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28495432 (View on PubMed)

Schwartz RS, Holmes DR, Van Tassel RA, Hauser R, Henry TD, Mooney M, Matthews R, Doshi S, Jones RM, Virmani R. Left atrial appendage obliteration: mechanisms of healing and intracardiac integration. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Aug;3(8):870-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.04.017.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20723861 (View on PubMed)

Bass JL. Transcatheter occlusion of the left atrial appendage--experimental testing of a new Amplatzer device. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Aug 1;76(2):181-5. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22536.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20665856 (View on PubMed)

Kar S, Hou D, Jones R, Werner D, Swanson L, Tischler B, Stein K, Huibregtse B, Ladich E, Kutys R, Virmani R. Impact of Watchman and Amplatzer devices on left atrial appendage adjacent structures and healing response in a canine model. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jul;7(7):801-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.03.003.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25060026 (View on PubMed)

January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr, Conti JB, Ellinor PT, Ezekowitz MD, Field ME, Murray KT, Sacco RL, Stevenson WG, Tchou PJ, Tracy CM, Yancy CW; ACC/AHA Task Force Members. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2014 Dec 2;130(23):2071-104. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000040. Epub 2014 Mar 28. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24682348 (View on PubMed)

Verheugt FW, Granger CB. Oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: current status, special situations, and unmet needs. Lancet. 2015 Jul 18;386(9990):303-10. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60245-8. Epub 2015 Mar 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25777666 (View on PubMed)

Lopez-Lopez JA, Sterne JAC, Thom HHZ, Higgins JPT, Hingorani AD, Okoli GN, Davies PA, Bodalia PN, Bryden PA, Welton NJ, Hollingworth W, Caldwell DM, Savovic J, Dias S, Salisbury C, Eaton D, Stephens-Boal A, Sofat R. Oral anticoagulants for prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation: systematic review, network meta-analysis, and cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ. 2017 Nov 28;359:j5058. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j5058.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29183961 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ANDES

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.