Observatory of Invasive Procedures and Bleeding in Patients Treated With New Oral Anticoagulants

NCT ID: NCT02185027

Last Updated: 2021-10-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1166 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-06-30

Study Completion Date

2016-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The arrival on the market of direct oral factor Xa and factor IIa inhibitors (dabigatran (Pradaxa®), rivaroxaban (Xarelto®), apixaban (Eliquis®) and others soon to come) raises novel questions among clinicians confronted with the emergency management of patients treated with these new drugs. It is likely that these new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) will eventually win a significant market share in the indications secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism and prevention of cardioembolic events in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, due to their net clinical benefit and their practicality of use compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).

However, despite the fact that NOACs reduce the incidence of intracranial bleeding by about half compared with VKAs, the risk remains significant; furthermore, in clinical trials, these drugs had little or no effect on reducing the incidence of major extracranial bleeding. In everyday practice, where the indication could be expanded to unselected populations and due to a potential for misuse, it is likely that the incidence of bleeding complications will be higher than that reported in clinical trials. Indeed, the numerous alerts emanating from regulatory agencies in various countries (US, Australia, etc.) bear witness to this, and should serve as a reminder that these anticoagulants have a real potential for bleeding complications and, in the absence of an antidote, there is no validated management strategy.

Furthermore, as these drugs can be prescribed for months or years, patients may eventually be exposed to situations at high hemorrhagic risk, such as emergency surgery or invasive procedures, trauma, etc. Analysis of data from the trial : dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (RE-LY) showed that during the two years of follow-up, approximately 25% of the patients underwent an invasive procedure, ranging from pacemaker insertion to major surgery. Thus, a large proportion of patients treated with NOACs are concerned by this issue.

In anticipation of a gradually increasing influx of patients in a critical situation (active bleeding or need to rapidly secure hemostasis before an invasive procedure), it is urgent to define the conduct to adopt based on the experience gained from the earliest cases. This is the objective of the French-speaking GIHP-NACO observatory set up by the GIHP (French Working Group on Perioperative Hemostasis).

For the moment, then, the management recommendations derive from expert opinions based on pharmacokinetic data and on the partial correction of NOAC-induced hypocoagulability by various nonspecific procoagulants (non-activated or activated prothrombin complex concentrates, recombinant factor VIIa). These procoagulants are currently used in an empirical manner to control bleeding, with as many successes as failures reported in the literature, and their benefit-risk ratio in these patients is therefore uncertain.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The management of critical situations is difficult for several reasons:

* First, there is significant intra- and inter-individual variability in the pharmacokinetics of NOACs, which is further heightened in the critical setting by drug interactions with other agents that interfere with P-GLYCOPROTEIN (P-GP) and cytochrome ( cytochrome P4503A4) in patients who are often elderly and multi medicated, and by rapid variations in renal function, which is essential for elimination of NOACs.
* Second, biological guidance is weak: there is no clearcut therapeutic range nor any validated hemostatic safety cutoff, as is the case with the International Normalized Ratio (INR) for VKAs. Conventional coagulation tests (PT/aPTT) are poorly standardized and difficult to interpret. Assays to measure the serum concentrations of these drugs are not widespread outside of a few teaching hospitals.
* Third, there is a lack of clinical experience. Analyses of critical situations that occurred during clinical trials were done after the fact and the data collected are heterogeneous and incomplete. Clinical cases reported in the literature are rarely well documented.

The objective of the observatory is to rapidly acquire documented and thorough feedback on clinical experience with these new drugs that will be able to confer a higher level of evidence to the management recommendations for treated patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Venous Thromboembolism Atrial Fibrillation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

complications and compliance with GIHP recommendations

Description at 1 month post-intervention of an potential event

complications and compliance with GIHP recommendations

Intervention Type OTHER

Description of complications, compliance, major bleeding events, treatments, reversal strategies.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

complications and compliance with GIHP recommendations

Description of complications, compliance, major bleeding events, treatments, reversal strategies.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years
* Managed in view of surgery or an invasive procedure, emergency or not
* Managed and hospitalized for active bleeding
* Long-term therapy (in the indication atrial fibrillation or treatment of pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis) by at least one antithrombotic agent from the following list: DABIGATRAN ETEXILATE MESYLATE or RIVAROXABAN or APIXABAN

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant women
* Refusal to participate in the study: listed in the non-inclusion registry
* Antithrombotics indicated for the prevention of venous thromboembolism
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Floralis

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Grenoble

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pierre Albaladejo, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Grenoble

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU Brugmann

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Hôpitaux du Léman

Thonon-les-Bains, haute-Savoie, France

Site Status

CH Agen

Agen, , France

Site Status

CHU d'Amiens

Amiens, , France

Site Status

CHR Annecy

Annecy, , France

Site Status

CHU Besançon

Besançon, , France

Site Status

CHU Bordeaux

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

CH Castres

Castres, , France

Site Status

CH Chambéry

Chambéry, , France

Site Status

CHU Clermont-Ferrand

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

CH Alpes leman

Contamine-sur-Arve, , France

Site Status

CHU Dijon

Dijon, , France

Site Status

CH Gap

Gap, , France

Site Status

CHU de Grenoble

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste Grenoble

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

CHRU Lille

Lille, , France

Site Status

HCL - Edouard Herriot

Lyon, , France

Site Status

HCL - Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse

Lyon, , France

Site Status

HCL - Lyon Sud

Lyon, , France

Site Status

CHU Marseille

Marseille, , France

Site Status

CHU Montpellier

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Centre Emile Gallé - SINCAL

Nancy, , France

Site Status

CHU Nancy

Nancy, , France

Site Status

CHU Nantes

Nantes, , France

Site Status

CH de Niort

Niort, , France

Site Status

CHU Nimes

Nîmes, , France

Site Status

APHP - Antoine Beclere

Paris, , France

Site Status

APHP - Tenon

Paris, , France

Site Status

APHP Henri Mondor

Paris, , France

Site Status

APHP Hôpital Bichat

Paris, , France

Site Status

APHP Hôpital Cochin

Paris, , France

Site Status

APHP Site St Antoine

Paris, , France

Site Status

Aphp-Hegp

Paris, , France

Site Status

APHP-Hôpital Beaujon

Paris, , France

Site Status

Centre Hôpital Américain

Paris, , France

Site Status

CHU Bicêtre

Paris, , France

Site Status

CHU Rennes

Rennes, , France

Site Status

CHRU Strasbourg - Hôpital Civil

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Sainte-Anne

Toulon, , France

Site Status

CHU Toulouse

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

CH Voiron

Voiron, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pernod G, Albaladejo P, Godier A, Samama CM, Susen S, Gruel Y, Blais N, Fontana P, Cohen A, Llau JV, Rosencher N, Schved JF, de Maistre E, Samama MM, Mismetti P, Sie P; Working Group on Perioperative Haemostasis. Management of major bleeding complications and emergency surgery in patients on long-term treatment with direct oral anticoagulants, thrombin or factor-Xa inhibitors: proposals of the working group on perioperative haemostasis (GIHP) - March 2013. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2013 Jun-Jul;106(6-7):382-93. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2013.04.009. Epub 2013 Jun 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23810130 (View on PubMed)

Marlu R, Hodaj E, Paris A, Albaladejo P, Cracowski JL, Pernod G. Effect of non-specific reversal agents on anticoagulant activity of dabigatran and rivaroxaban: a randomised crossover ex vivo study in healthy volunteers. Thromb Haemost. 2012 Aug;108(2):217-24. doi: 10.1160/TH12-03-0179. Epub 2012 May 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22627883 (View on PubMed)

Sie P, Samama CM, Godier A, Rosencher N, Steib A, Llau JV, Van der Linden P, Pernod G, Lecompte T, Gouin-Thibault I, Albaladejo P; Working Group on Perioperative Haemostasis; French Study Group on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Surgery and invasive procedures in patients on long-term treatment with direct oral anticoagulants: thrombin or factor-Xa inhibitors. Recommendations of the Working Group on Perioperative Haemostasis and the French Study Group on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2011 Dec;104(12):669-76. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Oct 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22152517 (View on PubMed)

Healey JS, Eikelboom J, Douketis J, Wallentin L, Oldgren J, Yang S, Themeles E, Heidbuchel H, Avezum A, Reilly P, Connolly SJ, Yusuf S, Ezekowitz M; RE-LY Investigators. Periprocedural bleeding and thromboembolic events with dabigatran compared with warfarin: results from the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) randomized trial. Circulation. 2012 Jul 17;126(3):343-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.090464. Epub 2012 Jun 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22700854 (View on PubMed)

Heidbuchel H, Verhamme P, Alings M, Antz M, Hacke W, Oldgren J, Sinnaeve P, Camm AJ, Kirchhof P; European Heart Rhythm Association. European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of new oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2013 May;15(5):625-51. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut083.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23625942 (View on PubMed)

Godon A, Gabin M, Levy JH, Huet O, Chapalain X, David JS, Tacquard C, Sattler L, Minville V, Memier V, Blanie A, Godet T, Leone M, De Maistre E, Gruel Y, Roullet S, Vermorel C, Samama CM, Bosson JL, Albaladejo P; GIHP-NACO Study Group. Management of urgent invasive procedures in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants: An observational registry analysis. Thromb Res. 2022 Aug;216:106-112. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2022.06.005. Epub 2022 Jun 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35785621 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DCIC 13 18

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Medical Need of OAC Reversal
NCT03254147 COMPLETED