Psychophysiological Stress Response in Medical Students During Simulation-Based Communication Training -Study Protocol
NCT ID: NCT06906614
Last Updated: 2025-04-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
150 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-04-01
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Impact of a Curriculum About Professionalism on Stress Response During a Critical Situation
NCT04192097
Stress Evaluation and Management Using High Fidelity Simulation in Medical Education
NCT06916949
The Effects of Stress on the Clinical Performance of Residents in Simulated Trauma Scenarios
NCT00485927
Stress and Clinical Reasoning in Medical Students
NCT01061255
Preventive Remediation of Stress for Optimal MEdical StudentS
NCT06295133
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary aim of the study is to identify key predictors of stress responses in third-year medical students during simulation-based communication training. In this context, "stress" is operationalized both through continuous physiological measurements-principally heart rate variability (HRV) recorded via Polar chest bands-and through a battery of psychometric assessments. The study is designed to evaluate:
Primary Aim:
To determine the predictive value of psychological traits (e.g., resilience, self-efficacy) on physiological stress markers (e.g., HRV stability) and subjective stress ratings during high-fidelity patient interactions with live actors.
Hypothesis: Students exhibiting higher levels of resilience and self-efficacy will demonstrate lower physiological stress responses (i.e., more stable HRV) and report lower subjective stress.
Comparison of Stressors Across Scenarios:
To examine whether different simulated patient interactions-such as those involving anxious, aggressive, silent, or emotionally distressed patients-elicit distinct stress responses. This component will allow for the evaluation of scenario-specific stress effects, which could have implications for tailoring simulation training.
Influence of Personality Traits:
To investigate how personality characteristics, particularly neuroticism and extraversion, influence the magnitude of stress responses during simulations. This analysis will provide insight into the extent to which individual differences moderate stress levels.
Practical Application:
To inform the development of targeted interventions, such as tailored stress management or coping programs, specifically designed for students who are identified as being highly reactive to stress during simulations.
Study Design and Methodology
The study employs an observational cohort design. Data will be collected from third-year medical students enrolled in the Medical Psychology and Psychosomatics course, who participate in simulation-based patient interactions. The detailed methodological framework is as follows:
Data Collection Phases:
Phase 1 (Baseline): Two days prior to simulation sessions, participants will complete a comprehensive set of psychometric questionnaires to assess baseline levels of stress, anxiety, resilience, and self-efficacy.
Phase 2 (Pre-Simulation): Immediately before the simulation begins, students will fill out a pre-simulation questionnaire aimed at capturing their immediate stress and anxiety levels.
Phase 3 (Post-Simulation): Directly after the simulation, a post-simulation questionnaire will be administered to record acute stress responses.
Phase 4 (Post-Debriefing): Following the debriefing session, students will complete a final set of questionnaires to assess any changes in stress levels after reflective processing.
Physiological Monitoring:
Throughout the simulation, continuous HRV data will be collected using Polar chest bands. These devices provide objective, high-resolution data on the autonomic responses of students during live interactions with standardized patients.
Additionally, each simulation session will be supplemented by observational assessments provided by trained actors (standardized patients), focusing on indicators such as body language, communication style, and overall stress manifestation.
Outcome Measures While the primary outcomes relate to physiological markers (HRV) and subjective stress ratings, secondary outcomes will explore the moderating effects of personality traits and the impact of different scenario types on stress responses. These outcomes will serve as predictors for tailoring future simulation-based interventions, ensuring that the training environment can be optimized to both challenge students and support their learning effectively.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
3rd-Year Medical Students in Simulation Training
This cohort consists of 3rd-year medical students enrolled in the Medical Psychology and Psychosomatics course, participating in simulation-based communication training.
Simulation-Based Communication Training
In our study, the intervention is more of an experimental situation - a scenario.
High-fidelity scenarios include patients played by real actors displaying anxiety, aggression, silence, and emotional distress in various clinical situations such as delivering serious news or frustration for waiting for physicians. The average time of each simulation is 12 minutes.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Simulation-Based Communication Training
In our study, the intervention is more of an experimental situation - a scenario.
High-fidelity scenarios include patients played by real actors displaying anxiety, aggression, silence, and emotional distress in various clinical situations such as delivering serious news or frustration for waiting for physicians. The average time of each simulation is 12 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Participation in the Medical Psychology and Psychosomatics course.
* Active involvement in simulation-based communication training sessions.
* Signed informed consent provided before the start of the study.
* Willingness to wear physiological monitoring devices (e.g., chest strap) during simulations.
Exclusion Criteria
* Absence of a smartphone with Bluetooth connectivity.
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Simulation Centre of the Faculty of Medicine of Masaryk University
UNKNOWN
Department of Simulation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University
UNKNOWN
Masaryk University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Miroslav Světlák
Department head (Department of Medical Psychology and Ethics)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University
Brno, Bohunice, Czechia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dunton H, Leng O, Catlow J, Hancock J, Metcalf J. Stress and heart rate in high-fidelity training scenarios for undergraduate medical students. Future Hosp J. 2016 Jun 1;3(Suppl 2):s16. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.3-2s-s16. No abstract available.
Peabody JE, Ryznar R, Ziesmann MT, Gillman L. A Systematic Review of Heart Rate Variability as a Measure of Stress in Medical Professionals. Cureus. 2023 Jan 29;15(1):e34345. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34345. eCollection 2023 Jan.
van Dulmen S, Tromp F, Grosfeld F, ten Cate O, Bensing J. The impact of assessing simulated bad news consultations on medical students' stress response and communication performance. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2007 Sep-Nov;32(8-10):943-50. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2007.06.016. Epub 2007 Aug 6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SIMU2025
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.