Psychophysiological Stress Response in Medical Students During Simulation-Based Communication Training -Study Protocol

NCT ID: NCT06906614

Last Updated: 2025-04-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-04-01

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this study, researchers will examine key predictors of stress reactions in medical students participating in simulation-based communication training. By using psychometric questionnaires and physiological measurements, the study will assess how psychological traits, resilience, and self-efficacy impact stress responses during simulated patient interactions. These simulations use live actors to portray emotionally challenging scenarios, such as communicating with anxious or aggressive patients. The results aim to identify factors that contribute to heightened stress, ultimately guiding the development of targeted stress-management strategies to improve students' readiness for real-world clinical settings.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Aims of the Study and Main Hypotheses

The primary aim of the study is to identify key predictors of stress responses in third-year medical students during simulation-based communication training. In this context, "stress" is operationalized both through continuous physiological measurements-principally heart rate variability (HRV) recorded via Polar chest bands-and through a battery of psychometric assessments. The study is designed to evaluate:

Primary Aim:

To determine the predictive value of psychological traits (e.g., resilience, self-efficacy) on physiological stress markers (e.g., HRV stability) and subjective stress ratings during high-fidelity patient interactions with live actors.

Hypothesis: Students exhibiting higher levels of resilience and self-efficacy will demonstrate lower physiological stress responses (i.e., more stable HRV) and report lower subjective stress.

Comparison of Stressors Across Scenarios:

To examine whether different simulated patient interactions-such as those involving anxious, aggressive, silent, or emotionally distressed patients-elicit distinct stress responses. This component will allow for the evaluation of scenario-specific stress effects, which could have implications for tailoring simulation training.

Influence of Personality Traits:

To investigate how personality characteristics, particularly neuroticism and extraversion, influence the magnitude of stress responses during simulations. This analysis will provide insight into the extent to which individual differences moderate stress levels.

Practical Application:

To inform the development of targeted interventions, such as tailored stress management or coping programs, specifically designed for students who are identified as being highly reactive to stress during simulations.

Study Design and Methodology

The study employs an observational cohort design. Data will be collected from third-year medical students enrolled in the Medical Psychology and Psychosomatics course, who participate in simulation-based patient interactions. The detailed methodological framework is as follows:

Data Collection Phases:

Phase 1 (Baseline): Two days prior to simulation sessions, participants will complete a comprehensive set of psychometric questionnaires to assess baseline levels of stress, anxiety, resilience, and self-efficacy.

Phase 2 (Pre-Simulation): Immediately before the simulation begins, students will fill out a pre-simulation questionnaire aimed at capturing their immediate stress and anxiety levels.

Phase 3 (Post-Simulation): Directly after the simulation, a post-simulation questionnaire will be administered to record acute stress responses.

Phase 4 (Post-Debriefing): Following the debriefing session, students will complete a final set of questionnaires to assess any changes in stress levels after reflective processing.

Physiological Monitoring:

Throughout the simulation, continuous HRV data will be collected using Polar chest bands. These devices provide objective, high-resolution data on the autonomic responses of students during live interactions with standardized patients.

Additionally, each simulation session will be supplemented by observational assessments provided by trained actors (standardized patients), focusing on indicators such as body language, communication style, and overall stress manifestation.

Outcome Measures While the primary outcomes relate to physiological markers (HRV) and subjective stress ratings, secondary outcomes will explore the moderating effects of personality traits and the impact of different scenario types on stress responses. These outcomes will serve as predictors for tailoring future simulation-based interventions, ensuring that the training environment can be optimized to both challenge students and support their learning effectively.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stress

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

3rd-Year Medical Students in Simulation Training

This cohort consists of 3rd-year medical students enrolled in the Medical Psychology and Psychosomatics course, participating in simulation-based communication training.

Simulation-Based Communication Training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

In our study, the intervention is more of an experimental situation - a scenario.

High-fidelity scenarios include patients played by real actors displaying anxiety, aggression, silence, and emotional distress in various clinical situations such as delivering serious news or frustration for waiting for physicians. The average time of each simulation is 12 minutes.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Simulation-Based Communication Training

In our study, the intervention is more of an experimental situation - a scenario.

High-fidelity scenarios include patients played by real actors displaying anxiety, aggression, silence, and emotional distress in various clinical situations such as delivering serious news or frustration for waiting for physicians. The average time of each simulation is 12 minutes.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Enrollment as a 3rd-year medical student at the Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University.
* Participation in the Medical Psychology and Psychosomatics course.
* Active involvement in simulation-based communication training sessions.
* Signed informed consent provided before the start of the study.
* Willingness to wear physiological monitoring devices (e.g., chest strap) during simulations.

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability or unwillingness to complete all phases of data collection, including pre- and post-simulation assessments.
* Absence of a smartphone with Bluetooth connectivity.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Simulation Centre of the Faculty of Medicine of Masaryk University

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Department of Simulation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Masaryk University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Miroslav Světlák

Department head (Department of Medical Psychology and Ethics)

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University

Brno, Bohunice, Czechia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Czechia

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Miroslav Světlák, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+420 549 49 1372

Veronika Kamenská, Ing.

Role: CONTACT

+420608335578

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Miroslav Světlák, PhD

Role: primary

549491372

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dunton H, Leng O, Catlow J, Hancock J, Metcalf J. Stress and heart rate in high-fidelity training scenarios for undergraduate medical students. Future Hosp J. 2016 Jun 1;3(Suppl 2):s16. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.3-2s-s16. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31098245 (View on PubMed)

Peabody JE, Ryznar R, Ziesmann MT, Gillman L. A Systematic Review of Heart Rate Variability as a Measure of Stress in Medical Professionals. Cureus. 2023 Jan 29;15(1):e34345. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34345. eCollection 2023 Jan.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36865953 (View on PubMed)

van Dulmen S, Tromp F, Grosfeld F, ten Cate O, Bensing J. The impact of assessing simulated bad news consultations on medical students' stress response and communication performance. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2007 Sep-Nov;32(8-10):943-50. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2007.06.016. Epub 2007 Aug 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17689196 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SIMU2025

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.