The Radiation ProtEction for Dose RedUction in the Cardiac CathEter Lab Study: The REDUCE Trial
NCT ID: NCT06875583
Last Updated: 2025-11-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-08-29
2026-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A new radiation protection device, called RAMPART, may help reduce radiation exposure for heart specialists and their teams. It could also allow them to wear lighter protective gear-or none at all-making their work safer and more comfortable.
This study will compare the radiation levels received by doctors and nurses during heart procedures when using RAMPART versus standard protection. By doing so, we hope to find out if this new device can better protect medical teams from radiation, improving both their safety and well-being.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Physician Radiation Exposure During Radial Access Cardiac Catheterization Using a RAD Board
NCT02088788
ATTENUATE (rAdpad proTecTion drapE iN redUcing rAdiaTion Exposure) Trial
NCT06233578
Effect of a Real Time Radiation Monitoring Device on Radiation Exposure During Cardiac Catheterization
NCT01510353
Combining Myocardial Strain and Cardiac CT to Optimize Left Ventricular Lead Placement in CRT Treatment
NCT01426321
Safety and Effectiveness of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus Conventional Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure
NCT07069738
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Although existing standard radiation protection measures somewhat reduces exposure, all cardiac catheter lab personnel still receive a certain dose of radiation and continue to accumulate lifetime exposure. Furthermore, leaded personal protective equipment is heavy, leads to orthopaedic complications, and detracts from operator comfort.
Novel radiation protection devices such as RAMPART may significantly reduce radiation doses to cardiac catheter lab personnel, and potentially allow the use of lighter lead, or no lead at all. In this study we aim to investigate if use of RAMPART significantly reduces radiation exposure, when compared with standard radiation protection. Standard coronary intervention procedures will be randomised to RAMPART or standard (radiation protection), and operators and Cath lab team doses will be compared.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
RAMPART Arm
The use of the RAMPART system to reduce operator radiation exposure
Radiation
The use of RAMPART radiation protection device
Standard Arm
Standard radiation protection
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Radiation
The use of RAMPART radiation protection device
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Male or female patients
* Planned to undergo either an elective or urgent coronary intervention procedure involving ionising radiation in the cardiac catheter lab, via the right and or left radial arteries.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients unable to give valid consent
* Pregnancy
* Femoral approach procedure
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rampart Health, L.L.C.
INDUSTRY
Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
John Hung
Consultant Cardiologist, Chief Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital
Liverpool, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lisko JC, Shekiladze N, Chamoun J, Sheikh N, Rainer K, Wei J, Binongo J, Raj L, Byku I, Rinfret S, Devireddy C, Jaber WA, Greenbaum AB, Babaliaros V, Steuterman S, Sandesara P, Nicholson WJ. Radiation Exposure Using Rampart vs Standard Lead Aprons and Shields During Invasive Cardiovascular Procedures. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Oct 19;3(1):101184. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101184. eCollection 2024 Jan.
Noor HA, Althawadi N, Noor Z, AlAnsari N, Chachar TS, Al Raisi S, Yousif N. Radiation Exposure During Invasive Cardiovascular Procedures: Portable Shielding System Versus Standard Lead Aprons. Cureus. 2024 Aug 29;16(8):e68108. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68108. eCollection 2024 Aug.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REDUCE
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.