Spinal Anesthesia for Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy

NCT ID: NCT06860893

Last Updated: 2025-11-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-02-28

Study Completion Date

2025-09-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators hypothesised that spinal anesthesia as an adjunct to general anesthesia would facilitate faster recovery and less pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic robotic prostatectomy. A double-blind placebo-controlled study was subsequently designed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients were allocated to either intrathecal injection of bupivacaine/morphine or a sham spinal procedure. All patients were placed in a sitting position and the skin over the lumbar region of the back was disinfected with chlorhexidine and draped sterile. In the intervention group the skin was infiltrated with 5 mL of lidocaine 10 mg/mL and a sterile 27-gauge pencil-point needle (Pajunk, GA, USA) was subsequently entered into the intrathecal space at the L2-3 or L3-4 interspace. After obtaining return of cerebrospinal fluid, hyperbaric bupivacaine 5 mg/mL 1,5 mL (7,5 mg) and morphine 200 µg/mL, 0.5 mL (100 µg) was injected intrathecally. Patients in the placebo group received an identical treatment as the patients in the intervention group, except for the intrathecal injection. After the skin was infiltrated with 5 mL of lidocaine 10 mg/mL, the attending anesthesiologist pressed one finger at the skin and talked as if she was giving an intrathecal injection at the L3-4 interspace. All patients were treated by the same anesthesiologist (MA).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Cancer Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Double blinded placebo controlled study
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Spinal anesthesia

After obtaining return of cerebrospinal fluid, hyperbaric bupivacaine 5 mg/mL 1,5 mL (7,5 mg) and morphine 200 µg/mL, 0.5 mL (100 µg) was injected intrathecally.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Spinal Anesthesia with Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

After obtaining return of cerebrospinal fluid, hyperbaric bupivacaine 5 mg/mL 1,5 mL (7,5 mg) and morphine 200 µg/mL, 0.5 mL (100 µg) was injected intrathecally.

Placebo

Local skin infiltration with lidocain 10 mg/ml

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Local skin infiltration with lidocaine

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Spinal Anesthesia with Bupivacaine

After obtaining return of cerebrospinal fluid, hyperbaric bupivacaine 5 mg/mL 1,5 mL (7,5 mg) and morphine 200 µg/mL, 0.5 mL (100 µg) was injected intrathecally.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Local skin infiltration with lidocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- Prostate cancer

Exclusion Criteria

* Benign prostate disease
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Tromso

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital of North Norway

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital of North Norway

Tromsø, , Norway

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Prostate REK 866656

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.