Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-02-17
2028-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Does the Use of Prophylactic Mesh Reduce Incisional Hernia?
NCT04700956
Suture Techniques to Reduce the Incidence of The inCisional Hernia
NCT01132209
Ventral Mesh Hernioplasty : Laparoscopic Versus Open Sublay
NCT06149858
Laparoscopic High-Ligation Repair of Indirect Inguinal Hernias in Adults
NCT06120114
Usefulness of a Prothetic Absorbable Mesh in Incisional Hernia Prevention After Midline Laparotomy
NCT02208557
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study will involve three Norwegian hospitals: Hamar Hospital, Gjøvik Hospital, and Lillehammer Hospital. Participants will be patients scheduled for midline laparotomy at these hospitals who consent to participate, meet the inclusion criteria, and do not meet any exclusion criteria. Participants will be randomly assigned to two groups, each receiving a different variation of fascia closure during laparotomy. One group will undergo closure using the standard small-bites technique only, while the other group will undergo closure with the small-bites technique in addition to an onlay polypropylene mesh.
The primary outcome is the occurrence of incisional hernia one year after surgery, identified through clinical examination and CT scan. Additionally, surgical site occurrences (e.g., hematoma, infection, seroma, wound dehiscence) will be recorded four to six weeks post-surgery. Quality of life and pain levels will also be assessed at both four to six weeks and one year after surgery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Mesh group
The patients in the mesh group are closed with small bites technique and in addition receiving an onlay polypropylene mesh when closing the fascia in midline laparotomies. These patients receive a subcutaneous drain to prevent seroma.
Prophylactic polypropylene onlay mesh
The patients in the mesh group are closed with small bites technique and in addition receiving an onlay polypropylene mesh when closing the fascia in midline laparotomies.
Suture group
The patients in the suture group are closed with small bites technique.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Prophylactic polypropylene onlay mesh
The patients in the mesh group are closed with small bites technique and in addition receiving an onlay polypropylene mesh when closing the fascia in midline laparotomies.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 18 years old or older
* Written consent by patient/family
* Midline laparotomy with delayed closure
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy
* Previous abdominal midline hernia mesh repair
* Abdominal compartment syndrome
* Linea alba closure not possible
* Life expectancy under six months
* Hernia in the midline with transverse diameter lager than 2 cm
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sykehuset Innlandet HF
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lars Martin Rekkedal, MD BBA
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Chief of surgery Hamar Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Innlandet Hospital Trust
Hamar, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
761933
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.