ProLOVE - Prospective Randomized Study of Midline Incisional Hernia Treatment

NCT ID: NCT00472537

Last Updated: 2013-04-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

157 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-11-30

Study Completion Date

2010-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This purpose of this study is to compare the recovery after an operation of an incisional hernia within the limits of the rectus muscles of the abdominal wall. The use of a mesh in the repair of a postoperative hernia is considered obligatory. Placement of a retromuscular mesh is done by open or laparoscopic surgery. Focus is on the recovery phase assuming a less painful recovery after a laparoscopic procedure.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Incisional ventral hernia after abdominal surgery is a fairly common condition. In recent years the use of a prosthesis in the repair procedure has proved very effective in preventing a new hernia. A retromuscular mesh placement seems to have superior results. The mesh may be placed retromuscular through an open surgical procedure or through a laparoscopic procedure in an intra-abdominal position. Both procedures are highly standardized. A heavy weight mesh is used in the open procedure, fixed in the midline only, and a composite mesh is used intraabdominally and fixed only with titanium tackers.

SF-36 is used to assess the quality of life, and its subscale BP (bodily pain) is used as primary outcome 3 weeks postoperatively. Secondary endpoints are return to daily life, pain, complications, recurrence, patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome.

Subjects are assessed at 1,3,8 weeks post operation and after 12 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HERNIA, VENTRAL

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Retromuscular Mesh repair of midline incisional hernia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic repair of midline incisional hernia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age over 18 years
* Postoperative hernias in the region of the recti abdomini muscles with a defect of less than 10 cm transversal width
* No contraindications to laparoscopic procedure
* The patient should be able to adequate ventilation/respiration after reduction of hernia contents
* Indications for elective surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant women
* Prior operation of abdominal hernia with mesh placement in the compartment of the rectus abdominus muscle (i.e. prior onlay mesh is acceptable)
* Need of an interpreter
* Current drug abuse, mental disorder or other condition which makes the patient incapable of postoperative follow up
* Body Mass index (BMI) \>40
* Other planned concurrent operation
* Current oral steroid treatment, or other immune system modulating treatment
* Incarcerated incisional hernias
* Parastomal hernias
* Prior history of open abdomen
* Enterocutaneous fistula or cutaneous infection
* Hepatic cirrhosis or ascites
* Generalized malignancy
* History of radiation treatment in the abdomen.
* ASA \>III
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Region Skåne FoUU

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Lund University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ethicon, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Einar & Inga Nilsson Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Anna-Lisa & Sven-Eric Lundgren Foundation, Malmö Sweden

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Crafoord Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Skane University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Peder Rogmark

M.D.,

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Agneta Montgomery, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Malmo University Hospital, Lund University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Malmö University Hospital, Department of Surgery

Malmo, Malmö, Sweden

Site Status

Arvika Hospital, Department of Surgery

Arvika, , Sweden

Site Status

Helsingborg Hospital, Department of Surgery

Helsingborg, , Sweden

Site Status

Lund University Hospital, Department of Surgery

Lund, , Sweden

Site Status

Mora Hospital, Department of Surgery

Mora, , Sweden

Site Status

Södertälje Hospital, Department of Surgery

Södertälje, , Sweden

Site Status

Västerås Central Hospital, Department of Surgery

Västerås, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rogmark P, Ekberg O, Montgomery A. Long-term retromuscular and intraperitoneal mesh size changes within a randomized controlled trial on incisional hernia repair, including a review of the literature. Hernia. 2017 Oct;21(5):687-696. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1624-9. Epub 2017 Jun 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28634690 (View on PubMed)

Rogmark P, Petersson U, Bringman S, Eklund A, Ezra E, Sevonius D, Smedberg S, Osterberg J, Montgomery A. Short-term outcomes for open and laparoscopic midline incisional hernia repair: a randomized multicenter controlled trial: the ProLOVE (prospective randomized trial on open versus laparoscopic operation of ventral eventrations) trial. Ann Surg. 2013 Jul;258(1):37-45. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828fe1b2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 23629524 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

200-06-005

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

LU030123PR

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Strattice in Repair of Inguinal Hernias
NCT00681291 COMPLETED PHASE4