Assessing the Impact of Additional Serratus Anterior Block Within 24-Hour on Postoperative Pain After Rhomboid Intercostal Block in VATS Patients
NCT ID: NCT06838039
Last Updated: 2025-08-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-04-01
2026-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Purpose: This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate whether the addition of a Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB) to the standard Rhomboid Intercostal Block (RIB) improves postoperative pain management in patients undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS).
Study Design:
* Type: Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
* Participants: 50 patients aged 18 -70 requiring VATS, randomized into two groups: one receiving RIB alone, and the other receiving RIB + SAPB.
* Duration: Pain and opioid consumption will be measured within 48 hours post-surgery.
* Outcome Measures: Pain levels using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), opioid usage, and patient satisfaction.
Significance:
The study addresses the gap in research regarding the combined use of SAPB and RIB in pain control for VATS. It hypothesizes that the combination will lead to better pain relief and reduced opioid dependence compared to RIB alone.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Intercostal Nerve Block for Pain Management After Uniportal Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgeries
NCT06838026
Deep Serratus Anterior Plane Block vs Surgically-placed Paravertebral Block for VATS Surgery
NCT03768193
Postoperative Analgesic Comparison of SPSI Block and SAP Block in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS)
NCT06778642
Effecot of Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block and Thoracic Paravertebral Block in VATS
NCT06219369
Serratus Posterior Superior Intekcostal Plane Block vs Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in VATS: A Randomized Trial"
NCT07020624
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Background:
Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) is a minimally invasive thoracic procedure that has revolutionized the treatment of lung diseases, pleural conditions, and mediastinal disorders. While it offers numerous advantages, including smaller incisions, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery, postoperative pain remains a significant challenge. Uncontrolled pain can impair pulmonary function, delay ambulation, and increase the need for opioids, which in turn elevates the risk of opioid-related side effects such as respiratory depression, nausea, and addiction potential.
Regional anesthesia techniques, particularly Rhomboid Intercostal Block (RIB), have gained popularity as effective methods for postoperative pain control following VATS. RIB is an ultrasound-guided technique that targets the intercostal nerves by depositing local anesthetic into the fascial plane between the rhomboid and intercostal muscles. This block has demonstrated efficacy in reducing pain intensity and opioid consumption in VATS patients. However, some patients may still experience inadequate pain relief, particularly in areas not covered by RIB alone.
The Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB) is another regional anesthesia technique that anesthetizes the lateral cutaneous branches of the thoracic intercostal nerves, which contribute to the sensory innervation of the chest wall. Given that SAPB and RIB target different pain pathways, combining these two blocks may provide broader and more effective analgesia for VATS patients.
While SAPB has been successfully utilized in thoracic surgeries, limited data exist regarding its additive effect when used in conjunction with RIB. This study aims to evaluate whether SAPB, when administered within 24 hours after RIB, provides superior postoperative pain control compared to RIB alone.
Scientific Rationale:
Postoperative pain in VATS originates from multiple sources, including surgical incision sites, pleural irritation, and muscle disruption. The intercostal nerves supply the majority of sensory innervation to the chest wall, making them primary targets for regional anesthesia.
* RIB blocks the dorsal rami of intercostal nerves, leading to effective posterior thoracic analgesia. However, it may not completely cover the lateral and anterior chest wall, which are innervated by lateral cutaneous branches.
* SAPB, on the other hand, targets the lateral cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerves, complementing the analgesia provided by RIB and potentially enhancing the overall pain relief.
By combining RIB and SAPB, this study hypothesizes that patients will experience superior pain relief, reduced opioid consumption, and improved satisfaction compared to RIB alone. This multimodal approach aligns with the growing emphasis on opioid-sparing anesthesia strategies.
Study Objective:
The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate whether the addition of SAPB to standard RIB improves postoperative pain control, reduces opioid consumption, and enhances patient satisfaction within 48 hours after VATS surgery.
Methodology
* Study Design: A prospective, randomized controlled trial.
* Participants: Adult patients (ages 18-70) undergoing VATS surgery.
* Group Allocation:
* Group A (Control Group): RIB only.
* Group B (Intervention Group): RIB + SAPB (SAPB administered within 24 hours after RIB).
* Primary Outcome Measure:
* Pain severity assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at multiple postoperative time points.
* Secondary Outcome Measures:
* Total opioid consumption within 48 hours.
* Patient satisfaction scores via standardized questionnaires.
* Incidence of complications or adverse effects related to regional anesthesia.
* Blinding: The outcome assessor will be blinded to the intervention groups to reduce bias.
* Data Collection and Analysis:
* Baseline demographic and clinical data will be recorded.
* Statistical analysis will compare pain scores, opioid use, and satisfaction levels between the two groups.
* Subgroup analyses may be performed based on VATS procedure types or patient demographics.
Expected Outcomes
We hypothesize that the combination of SAPB with RIB will result in:
* Significant reductions in pain scores within 48 hours.
* Lower opioid consumption compared to RIB alone.
* Higher overall patient satisfaction with pain management. If successful, this study could provide strong clinical evidence supporting the routine use of SAPB alongside RIB for VATS pain control.
Significance:
This study addresses an important gap in postoperative pain management for VATS patients. While RIB alone is widely used, its efficacy in providing complete analgesia is still under debate. By exploring the synergistic effects of SAPB and RIB, this trial aims to advance regional anesthesia techniques and contribute to more effective, multimodal pain management strategies.
The results of this study have potential clinical implications for thoracic anesthesia practice, particularly in settings where minimizing opioid use is a priority due to concerns about addiction, side effects, and prolonged hospital stays.
Trial Locations:
The trial will be conducted at Al-Ahli and Al-St. Joseph's Hospitals, Palestine, where VATS procedures are routinely performed.
Budget and Resource Allocation
* Participant recruitment and informed consent process.
* Materials for data collection, including VAS scales and patient satisfaction questionnaires.
* Statistical analysis software to ensure robust data interpretation.
* Ultrasound guidance equipment and anesthetic agents for RIB and SAPB administration
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm 1 (RIB Only)
Participants receive a Rhomboid Intercostal Block (RIB) as the sole regional anesthesia technique for postoperative pain management after VATS
Rhomboid Intercostal Block (RIB)
Rhomboid Intercostal Block (RIB) A regional anesthesia technique administered under ultrasound guidance for postoperative pain relief. This will be used as the sole intervention in Arm 1.
Arm 2 (RIB + SAPB)
Participants receive both RIB and SAPB within 24 hours postoperatively
Rhomboid Intercostal Block (RIB) + Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB)
A combination of two regional anesthesia techniques, Rhomboid Intercostal Block (RIB) and Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB),(THE SAPB will received within 24 hours after RIB) administered under ultrasound guidance. SAPB targets the lateral cutaneous branches of the thoracic nerves, complementing the pain relief provided by RIB. This combination is used in Arm 2 to enhance postoperative analgesia.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Rhomboid Intercostal Block (RIB)
Rhomboid Intercostal Block (RIB) A regional anesthesia technique administered under ultrasound guidance for postoperative pain relief. This will be used as the sole intervention in Arm 1.
Rhomboid Intercostal Block (RIB) + Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB)
A combination of two regional anesthesia techniques, Rhomboid Intercostal Block (RIB) and Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB),(THE SAPB will received within 24 hours after RIB) administered under ultrasound guidance. SAPB targets the lateral cutaneous branches of the thoracic nerves, complementing the pain relief provided by RIB. This combination is used in Arm 2 to enhance postoperative analgesia.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS).
3. Classified as ASA physical status I-III (low to moderate surgical risk).
4. Ability to provide informed consent and follow study protocols.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Presence of bleeding disorders or anticoagulant use.
3. History of chronic opioid use or opioid dependence.
4. Anatomical abnormalities or conditions preventing the application of regional anesthesia (e.g., chest wall deformities).
5. Presence of neurological disorders affecting pain perception.
6. Cognitive impairments, language barriers, or inability to communicate effectively.
7. Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
8. Refusal or inability to provide informed consent.
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Al-Quds University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Al Ahli hospital
Hebron, , Palestinian Territories
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Re27-06-024
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.