Antimicrobial Combination Therapy for Treatment of Enterococcus Faecalis Bacteremia
NCT ID: NCT06833593
Last Updated: 2025-12-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
510 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-02-06
2026-09-26
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Combination Treatment for Enterococcus Faecalis Bacteriemia Multicenter, Observational Study"
NCT04070820
From Commensalism to Pathogenicity: Exploring the Pathophysiology of Bacteremia to Better Understand Enterococcus Faecalis Infective Endocarditis
NCT07313865
Clinical Significance and Optimal Treatment of Community-onset Urinary Tract Infections Caused by Extended-spectrum β-lactamase and/or AmpC β-lactamase Producing Enterobacteriaceae
NCT01138566
Study of Human Microbiota in Healthy and Pathological Conditions
NCT03460392
Impact of Beta-lactams on the Microbiota and Relative Fecal Abundance of Mulltidrug Resistant Bacteria
NCT03338738
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The optimal treatment of EF-BSI uncomplicated with endocarditis is still a matter of debate. Ampicillin is commonly considered the drug of choice, when active in vitro. However, several studies demonstrated the synergistic effect of the combination treatment with an aminoglycosides or ceftriaxone in case of life-threatening infections. To date the efficacy of the combination treatment in patients with EF-BSI was poorly evaluated in clinical studies and most of the data come from very old uncontrolled clinical observations. One strategy for overcoming this uncertainty is to assess the synergistic interaction of different antimicrobial molecules by in vitro tests and to validate in vitro synergisms with clinical studies. Indeed, in vitro evaluation of the drug combination effect has the potentiality for improving treatment by suggesting the possible synergistic or antagonistic interaction of antimicrobial associations. Although, different studies suggested the potential clinical utility of synergy testing, the real prognostic value of these methods is not defined yet. In this context, synergy testing could be used as strategy for improving antibiotic treatment of EF-BSI by suggesting the optimal antimicrobial combination therapy. Ceftaroline and ceftobiprole are two novel cephalosporins, which exhibit intrinsic activity against methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Both drugs seem to show a good level of affinity to penicillin binding protein (PBP) 5, a class B, commonly expressed by Enterococcus spp. The use of these drugs in association with ampicillin or daptomycin seems promising. However, clinical efficacy of these combinations is not well defined yet. Gut microbiota of healthy individual is composed by a consortium of bacteria balanced by symbiotic or antagonistic relationships. Antimicrobial treatments altered this equilibrium conferring competitive advantage for different species, including host pathogens. Disruption of the balance in the gut microbial composition has been associated to different pathological conditions (metabolic disease, type 2 diabetes, colorectal cancer or inflammatory bowel disease). Also, administration of antimicrobials contributes to increase resistome in the intestinal microbiota and diffusion of antimicrobialresistant pathogens through selective pressure. The central objective of this study is to identify the gut microbiota signature associated to different antimicrobial therapy of EF-BSI and to clinically validate novel diagnostic tools for optimizing antimicrobial therapy in critically ill patients.
The primary aim of the study is to compare efficacy of appropriate monotherapy vs combination treatment for EF-BSI and validate clinically the in vitro synergistic/antagonistic interaction of antimicrobial combinations by synergy tests.
Secondary objectives are:
* To define the prognostic and predictive value of EF genotypic and phenotypic traits on the basis of antimicrobial treatment and clinical outcome
* To compare gut microbiota fingerprint of patients with EF-BSI and correlate to antimicrobial treatment and clinical outcome
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Adult with Enterococcus faecalis monomicrobial bloodstream infection
Adult patients with primary Enterococcus faecalis monomicrobial bloodstream infection
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Monomicrobial EF-BSI
* Receipt of ≥ 5 days of at least one in vitro active drug (ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, ampicillin/sulbactam, piperacillin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, daptomycin and linezolid) with or without a synergistic drug (ceftriaxone, gentamycin, streptomycin), at common suggested dosages for EF-BSI in empirical or definitive therapy
* Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Other concomitant infection
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Maddalena Giannella, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ospedale Maggiore "Carlo Alberto Pizzardi" di Bologna
Bologna, Bologna, Italy
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna
Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Catanzaro "Mater Domini"
Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
Humanitas Research Hospital
Milan, Milano, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
"Ricerca Finalizzata 2019"
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
Micro-EFfAECT
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.