Can the Relative Fecal Abundance of BLSE and the Digestive Microbiota be Predictive of the Risk of Infection in a Carrier Patient?

NCT ID: NCT04699981

Last Updated: 2023-09-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-03-31

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Among Enterobacteriaceae, the production of beta-lactamases (ESBLs) is the leading cause of multi-resistance. The first cases of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (E-ESBL) infections were described in the 1980s and subsequently experienced worldwide dissemination.

Since the turn of the century, the prevalence of E-ESBL infections, especially among Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) has increased dramatically.

The emergence of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae is currently a real public health problem. The European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network evaluated, among clinical strains, the rate of resistance to 3rd generation cephalosporins (C3G) at 9.5% for E. coli and 28% for K. pneumoniae. Numerous studies have shown that bacterial colonization is the prerequisite for the occurrence of many infections.

However, the existence of prior colonization does not seem to be the only risk factor for the occurrence of a secondary infection. Therefore, in patients with multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacillus gastrointestinal carriage there appear to be factors associated with the onset of infection. Several studies have examined the risk factors associated with E-ESBL-related infections in both community-based and healthcare-associated / nosocomial infections. Two main risk factors seem to be associated with E-ESBL infections: prior antibiotic therapy and the existence of invasive devices.

A recent study, carried out on 1288 patients and aimed at validating a predictive score for the occurrence of ESBL-E bacteremia, demonstrated 5 factors associated with the appearance of E-ESBL-linked bacteremia. These factors were: (i) a history of colonization / infection with ESBL-E, (ii) age ≥ 43 years, (iii) recent hospitalization in a region with a high prevalence of ESBL-E, (iv) antibiotic therapy ≥ 6 days in the previous 6 months and (v) the existence of a chronic vascular access.

Recently, a retrospective case-control study conducted in the United States by Augustine et al. Suggested that 5% of cases of bacteremia were related to ESBL-E.

Few studies have looked at risk factors for infection in patients known to be colonized by the digestive system. In a retrospective case-control study, conducted outside the intensive care unit and including pediatric and adult patients, the authors identified 2 factors associated with the occurrence of Ec-ESBL infection in previously colonized patients. These two factors were the prior use of antibiotics with β-lactam antibiotics and β-lactamase inhibitor (s), and urinary catheterization.

In intensive care hospital patients, the occurrence of ESBL-producing enterobacteriaceae infection appears to be a rare event, including in colonized patients.

The work of Ruppé et al. showed a direct link between relative fecal abundance of EScher-producing Escherichia coli and prior antibiotic intake.

This work also demonstrated a link between the value of the relative fecal abundance in Ec-ESBL and the occurrence of a urinary tract infection linked to the same clone. In particular, the authors found that women with a low relative fecal abundance rate (≤ 0.1%) had no risk of developing an Escherichia coli urinary tract infection. Conversely, the risk increased with the relative fecal abundance of Escherichia coli, but with a positive predictive value limited to 57% for relative fecal abundances between 10 and 100%.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Enterobacteria Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control: Patients colonized rectally with ESBL-producing enterobacteria without antibiotic pressure

Known patients colonized rectally with ESBL-producing enterobacteria and not subjected to antibiotic pressure

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Control (Patients colonized rectally with ESBL-producing enterobacteria without antibiotic pressure)

Intervention Type OTHER

For patients included in the "Control group" on discharge from hospitalization and 60 days after inclusion of patients, data will be collected either from the patient's medical file (T1Control) or during '' a telephone call from the patient (T2Control). The data collected concerns the occurrence of an infectious episode. They will also benefit from a stool sample at T1 control in order to assess the evolution kinetics of the relative fecal abundance of ESBL-producing enterobacteria in these patients who are not subjected to antibiotic pressure but subjected to other drug pressures (PPI, corticosteroids, etc.).

Case: Patients colonized rectally with ESBL-producing enterobacteriaceae, with antibiotic pressure

Known patients colonized rectally with ESBL-producing enterobacteriaceae and subjected to antibiotic pressure (antibiotic therapy predicted greater than 24 hours) with beta-lactams or dual therapy comprising a beta-lactam. The prescription of antibiotic therapy, a decision independent of the study procedures, will be carried out as part of routine care in the context of microbiologically documented infection. The choice of molecules will be left to the discretion of clinicians.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Case (Patients colonized rectally with ESBL-producing enterobacteriaceae, with antibiotic pressure)

Intervention Type OTHER

A stool culture is performed on the first stool emitted after the start of antibiotic therapy. 72 hours after the start of antibiotic therapy, a blood sample (5 ml) and a stool sample will be taken. A stool sample will be taken at the end of the antibiotic therapy and 60 days after the end of the antibiotic therapy. In the event of "normal" transit (daily bowel movements), the stool emitted 48 hours after the start of antibiotic therapy will be analyzed. If the patient does not pass stool, an eswab rectal swab will be taken. In the event of discharge from the hospital before the end of the antibiotic therapy and / or the D60 after the end of the antibiotic therapy, the patient will be given a prescription and an appointment at the collection center of the center concerned for the sample stool.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Control (Patients colonized rectally with ESBL-producing enterobacteria without antibiotic pressure)

For patients included in the "Control group" on discharge from hospitalization and 60 days after inclusion of patients, data will be collected either from the patient's medical file (T1Control) or during '' a telephone call from the patient (T2Control). The data collected concerns the occurrence of an infectious episode. They will also benefit from a stool sample at T1 control in order to assess the evolution kinetics of the relative fecal abundance of ESBL-producing enterobacteria in these patients who are not subjected to antibiotic pressure but subjected to other drug pressures (PPI, corticosteroids, etc.).

Intervention Type OTHER

Case (Patients colonized rectally with ESBL-producing enterobacteriaceae, with antibiotic pressure)

A stool culture is performed on the first stool emitted after the start of antibiotic therapy. 72 hours after the start of antibiotic therapy, a blood sample (5 ml) and a stool sample will be taken. A stool sample will be taken at the end of the antibiotic therapy and 60 days after the end of the antibiotic therapy. In the event of "normal" transit (daily bowel movements), the stool emitted 48 hours after the start of antibiotic therapy will be analyzed. If the patient does not pass stool, an eswab rectal swab will be taken. In the event of discharge from the hospital before the end of the antibiotic therapy and / or the D60 after the end of the antibiotic therapy, the patient will be given a prescription and an appointment at the collection center of the center concerned for the sample stool.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patient (≥ 18 years old) hospitalized at the Paris Saint-Joseph Hospital Group or in the intensive care unit of Avicenne hospital, Necker Enfants Malades hospital, Center Sud Francilien, detected as a carrier of enterobacteriaceae in the digestive system ESBL producers
* Patient affiliated to a health insurance plan
* French-speaking patient
* Patient living at home, in EHPAD or retirement home
* Patient or Relative able to give free, informed and express consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Known patient colonized rectally with ESBL-producing enterobacteria and subjected to antibiotic pressure other than beta-lactams
* Patient participating simultaneously in other intervention research that may interfere with the objectives of the study
* Patient under guardianship or curatorship
* Patient deprived of liberty
* Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Benoit PILMIS, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph

Paris, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, France

Site Status RECRUITING

Hôpital Necker-Enfants malades

Paris, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hôpital Avicenne

Bobigny, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Centre Hospitalier Sud-Francilien

Corbeil-Essonnes, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Benoit PILMIS, MD

Role: CONTACT

144127820 ext. +33

Helene BEAUSSIER, PharmD, pHD

Role: CONTACT

144127883 ext. +33

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Benoit PILMIS, MD

Role: primary

144127820 ext. +33

Claire ROUZAUD, MD

Role: primary

Jean-Ralph Zahar, MD

Role: primary

Didier LECOINTE, MD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wertheim HF, Vos MC, Ott A, van Belkum A, Voss A, Kluytmans JA, van Keulen PH, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM, Meester MH, Verbrugh HA. Risk and outcome of nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in nasal carriers versus non-carriers. Lancet. 2004 Aug 21-27;364(9435):703-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16897-9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15325835 (View on PubMed)

Bruyere R, Vigneron C, Bador J, Aho S, Toitot A, Quenot JP, Prin S, Charles PE. Significance of Prior Digestive Colonization With Extended-Spectrum beta-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae in Patients With Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia. Crit Care Med. 2016 Apr;44(4):699-706. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001471.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26571186 (View on PubMed)

Dubinsky-Pertzov B, Temkin E, Harbarth S, Fankhauser-Rodriguez C, Carevic B, Radovanovic I, Ris F, Kariv Y, Buchs NC, Schiffer E, Cohen Percia S, Nutman A, Fallach N, Klausner J, Carmeli Y; R-GNOSIS WP4 Study Group. Carriage of Extended-spectrum Beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and the Risk of Surgical Site Infection After Colorectal Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study. Clin Infect Dis. 2019 May 2;68(10):1699-1704. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy768.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30204851 (View on PubMed)

Zahar JR, Lesprit P, Ruckly S, Eden A, Hikombo H, Bernard L, Harbarth S, Timsit JF, Brun-Buisson C; BacterCom Study Group. Predominance of healthcare-associated cases among episodes of community-onset bacteraemia due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017 Jan;49(1):67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.09.032. Epub 2016 Nov 16.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27890442 (View on PubMed)

Rodriguez-Bano J, Navarro MD, Retamar P, Picon E, Pascual A; Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamases-Red Espanola de Investigacion en Patologia Infecciosa/Grupo de Estudio de Infeccion Hospitalaria Group. beta-Lactam/beta-lactam inhibitor combinations for the treatment of bacteremia due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli: a post hoc analysis of prospective cohorts. Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jan 15;54(2):167-74. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir790. Epub 2011 Nov 4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22057701 (View on PubMed)

Goodman KE, Lessler J, Cosgrove SE, Harris AD, Lautenbach E, Han JH, Milstone AM, Massey CJ, Tamma PD; Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group. A Clinical Decision Tree to Predict Whether a Bacteremic Patient Is Infected With an Extended-Spectrum beta-Lactamase-Producing Organism. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Oct 1;63(7):896-903. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw425. Epub 2016 Jun 28.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27358356 (View on PubMed)

Augustine MR, Testerman TL, Justo JA, Bookstaver PB, Kohn J, Albrecht H, Al-Hasan MN. Clinical Risk Score for Prediction of Extended-Spectrum beta-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae in Bloodstream Isolates. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 Mar;38(3):266-272. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.292. Epub 2016 Dec 19.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27989244 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

COPROBLSE2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.