Effect of Starpen CCLAD in Injection and Extraction

NCT ID: NCT06827223

Last Updated: 2025-02-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

66 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-02-28

Study Completion Date

2026-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The present study aims to evaluate the effect of computer-controlled Starpen automatic injection device versus the traditional syringe on pain perception during Injection of nerve block anesthesia and extraction of mandibular primary molars.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Pain is "An unpleasant sensory and emotional experience connected to actual or potential tissue damage or described in terms of such damage". According to the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, a patient may experience serious physical and psychological complications from improper pain management.

Anxiety, a fear of dental procedures, is often linked to unpleasant stimuli such as needle phobia, high vibration, noises, pain, and the smell of materials or medications. Patients who experience anxiety often exhibit complex behavior before or during dental procedures, causing additional discomfort.

In most dental procedures, Local anesthetic (LA) is crucial to alleviate pain during dental procedures enabling the dentist to complete the process. Even though LA is used to reduce pain during the procedure, but traditional methods itself can cause pain, making pediatric patients anxious and uncooperative in dental offices.

Effective pain management is crucial for children receiving dental injections to promote comfort, cooperation, and compliance. These techniques include topical analgesics, distraction, injection rates, buffering and warming the local anesthesia, speed reduction, fine needles, and precooling. Yet, no conclusive painless injection technique has been developed yet.

Finally, The Wand system, developed in 1997 by Milestone Scientific Inc., it was the first Computer-Controlled Local Anesthesia Delivery (CCLAD)discovered. Other devices like Morpheus, Calaject, Quicksleeper, and Smartject have entered the market, these systems varying in injection speed, design, weight, and shape, so, dentists can select the one that best meets their requirements.

This device's main concept is that a local anesthetic injection is done by lowering the pressure and flow rate.

The CCLAD reduced destructive behaviors in young children who were difficult to cooperate compared to the traditional method and created a positive experience for both the patient and physician.

The main advantage of these CCLADS devices is The ability to provide a small quantity of the local anesthetic solution with a stable injection mode, which decreases the discomfort associated with less controlled injections. In both adult and pediatric dentistry, the CCLADS devices have proven effective for extractions, pulpal therapies, and restorations. Patients also tolerate them well and behave less disruptively.

The Traditional injection syringe compared with computer-controlled local analgesic delivery devices (CCLAD) regarding disruptive behavior, pain, anxiety, and biochemical parameters. The results showed lower VAS, WBS, and salivary cortisol values in CCLADS patients compared to the traditional syringe group. They concluded that a positive impact of CCLADS on pain and anxiety can be recommended for pediatric patients.

Using CCLADs is significantly less painful than using traditional syringes and opens new, promising opportunities for working with patients presenting high dental fear.

The Starpen is one of the most recent advances that is promoted as a more comfortable and painless alternative to the traditional local anesthetic syringe. It includes a power adapter, cartridge holder, handpiece, and charging base. In dental uses, it can be injected intramuscularly or subcutaneously. It comes in three different speeds-high, low, and hybrid-and two aspiration modes-manual and auto. It may be used with the majority of the conventional gauge needles.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Assessment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

control group

nerve block anesthesia and extraction of mandibular primary molars using a Traditional Syringe

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Traditional Syringe

Intervention Type DEVICE

nerve block anesthesia and extraction of mandibular primary molars using Traditional Syringe

intervention group

nerve block anesthesia and extraction of mandibular primary molars using Computer-controlled Starpen Automatic Injection Device

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

computer-controlled Starpen Automatic Injection Device

Intervention Type DEVICE

using computer-controlled Starpen Automatic Injection Device during inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia and extraction of mandibular primary molars

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

computer-controlled Starpen Automatic Injection Device

using computer-controlled Starpen Automatic Injection Device during inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia and extraction of mandibular primary molars

Intervention Type DEVICE

Traditional Syringe

nerve block anesthesia and extraction of mandibular primary molars using Traditional Syringe

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children aged 6-8 years
* Cooperative children (Rating 3 or 4 based on the Frankl behavior scale)
* Medically fit children (ASA I).
* Children are mentally capable of communication.
* First dental visit.
* Patient requiring extraction of lower primary molars due to root caries, crown fractures, periapical disease, and failed pulpotomies.

Exclusion Criteria

* Children with a behavioral management problem.
* Parental refusal of participation.
* Children with a previous history of local anesthesia injection.
* Medically unfit children (other than ASA I).
* Uncooperative children (other than Frankl 3,4).
* Children under medications (antibiotics and analgesics) for the previous 48 hours that could alter the pain perception.
* Teeth that showed any signs of mobility, ankylosis, or root resorption affecting more than one-third of the root
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

8 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sara Mostafa Abohashim Masoud Soliman

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Sara M Soliman, Bachelor's degree 2020

Role: CONTACT

00201009740402

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Saoji H, Nainan MT, Nanjappa N, Khairnar MR, Hishikar M, Jadhav V. Assessment of computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system for pain control during restorative procedures: A randomized controlled trial. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2019 Fall;13(4):298-304. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2019.045.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32190214 (View on PubMed)

Patini R, Staderini E, Cantiani M, Camodeca A, Guglielmi F, Gallenzi P. Dental anaesthesia for children - effects of a computer-controlled delivery system on pain and heart rate: a randomised clinical trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Oct;56(8):744-749. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Aug 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30143396 (View on PubMed)

Attia S, Austermann T, May A, Mekhemar M, Conrad J, Knitschke M, Bottger S, Howaldt HP, Riad A. Pain perception following computer-controlled versus conventional dental anesthesia: randomized controlled trial. BMC Oral Health. 2022 Sep 22;22(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02454-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36138388 (View on PubMed)

Janik K, Niemczyk W, Peterek R, Roj R, Balicz A, Morawiec T. Computer-Controlled Local Anaesthesia Delivery efficacy - a literature review. Saudi Dent J. 2024 Aug;36(8):1066-1071. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.05.012. Epub 2024 May 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 39176166 (View on PubMed)

Shilpapriya M, Jayanthi M, Reddy VN, Sakthivel R, Selvaraju G, Vijayakumar P. Effectiveness of new vibration delivery system on pain associated with injection of local anesthesia in children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2015 Jul-Sep;33(3):173-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.160343.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26156269 (View on PubMed)

Anil O, Keskin G. Comparison of computer controlled local anesthetic delivery and traditional injection regarding disruptive behaviour, pain, anxiety and biochemical parameters: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Jan;48(1):120-127. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2023.046. Epub 2024 Jan 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38239164 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Starpen CCLAD in injection

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.